No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Staging Emile: Audience and Genre in Collective Self-Legislation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 July 2019
Abstract
Rousseau's interpreters often disagree over whether the Emile prepares its protagonist for membership in the Social Contract’s political community or presents him as an alternative to it. I argue that such attempts to determine the compatibility of Rousseau's different “projects” obscures his broader engagement with his contemporary popular audiences—particularly those associated with the theater and the novel—and the political implications therein. In contrast to the above debate, I turn to Emile to argue that in this work Rousseau attempts to shape readers in distinct and crucial ways. Emile does not simply present precepts to be embraced but intervenes into the underlying communicative dynamics that need to obtain for Rousseau's conception of collective self-legislation. It does so by shifting between the theatrical and novelistic generic conventions identified in his prior engagements with popular audiences, thus generating a reading experience that orients readers to continuously revisit their constitution as a collective audience.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2019
Footnotes
I would like to thank Arturo Chang, Mary Dietz, Emre Gercek, Sidra Hamidi, David Williams, and Elizabeth Wingrove for their invaluable comments and encouragement, as well as the participants of the Northwestern Political Theory Workshop and the Western Political Science Association panel in which a draft of this paper was presented.
References
1 See, especially, Shklar, Judith, Men and Citizens: A Study of Rousseau's Social Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)Google Scholar; Melzer, Arthur, The Natural Goodness of Man: On the System of Rousseau's Thought (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990), 88–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Gauthier, David, Rousseau: The Sentiment of Existence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Shklar, Men and Citizens, 5.
3 Neuhouser, Frederick, Rousseau's Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 252–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Also see Gomes, Bjorn, “Emile the Citizen? A Reassessment of the Relationship between Private Education and Citizenship in Rousseau's Political Thought,” European Journal of Political Theory 17, no. 2 (2018): 194–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Fraistat, Shawn, “Domination and Care in Rousseau's Emile,” American Political Science Review 110, no. 4 (2016): 889–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for two recent interpretations that complicate Neuhouser's characterization of Emile's education and Shklar's characterization of his individuation while maintaining the above interpretive tendency: both determine the compatibility of Rousseau's works insofar as Emile either “fits” into the world of the Social Contract or, failing that, offers Rousseau's readers an alternate model of citizenship.
5 Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts, in The First and Second Discourses, trans. Roger D. Masters and Judith R. Masters (New York: St. Martin's, 1964). Hereafter FD.
6 Jean Starobinski, Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988), 96.
7 “Représentation théâtrale que l'on donne au public” (Dictionnaire de l'Académie française, 4th ed. [1762], s.v. “spectacle,” https://artfl-project.uchicago.edu/content/dictionnaires-dautrefois, accessed November 11, 2016).
8 “De certaines grandes cérémonies ou réjouissances publiques” (ibid.).
9 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Politics and the Arts: Letter to M. D'Alembert on the Theater, trans. Bloom, Allan (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1960), 126Google Scholar. Hereafter LA.
10 Dictionnaire de l'Académie française, s.v. “spectacle.”
11 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, The Collected Writings of Rousseau, vol. 6, Julie, or the New Heloise, trans. Stewart, Philip and Vaché, Jean (Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College Press, 1997), 31Google Scholar. Hereafter NH.
12 See Marshall, David, The Surprising Effects of Sympathy: Marivaux, Diderot, Rousseau, and Mary Shelley (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Wingrove, Elizabeth, Rousseau's Republican Romance (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Dugan, C. N. and Strong, Tracy, “Music, Politics, Theater, and Representation in Rousseau,” in The Cambridge Companion to Rousseau, ed. Riley, Patrick (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)Google Scholar.
13 Ball, Terence, “Rousseau's Civil Religion Reconsidered,” in Reappraising Political Theory (Oxford: Clarendon, 1995), 122Google Scholar.
14 See Forman-Barzilai, Fonna, “The Emergence of Contextualism in Rousseau's Political Thought: The Case of Parisian Theatre in the Lettre à D'Alembert,” History of Political Thought 24, no. 3 (2003): 435–63Google Scholar.
15 See Kohn, Margaret, “Homo Spectator: Public Space in the Age of the Spectacle,” Philosophy & Social Criticism 34, no. 5 (2008): 467–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, The Social Contract, trans. Cranston, Maurice (London: Penguin Books, 1968), 2.6Google Scholar. Hereafter SC.
17 Cranston's translation uses the term “inscribed,” departing from the French graver.
18 Wingrove, Elizabeth, “Sexual Performance as Political Performance in the Lettre à M. D'Alembert sur les Spectacles,” Political Theory 23, no. 4 (1995): 609CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
19 Joan Landes, Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988), 67.
20 Robert Darnton, “Readers Respond to Rousseau: The Fabrication of Romantic Sensibility,” in The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History (New York: Basic Books, 1984), 242.
21 Indeed, Julie was first conceived as a play that Rousseau ultimately abandoned; see Kelly, Christopher, “Taking Readers as They Are: Rousseau's Turn from Discourses to Novels,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 33, no. 1 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. As Paige argues, Julie “enables Rousseau to do what he had, in the Lettre à D'Alembert, held to be an impossibility: he has made a virtuous character appealing” (Paige, Nicholas, Before Fiction: The Ancien Régime of the Novel [Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011], 128)Google Scholar.
22 See Darnton, “Readers Respond,” esp. 222.
23 Ibid., 233. The cultivation of such a capacity indeed suggests that isolation is not defined by distance from the city but rather by the process of novelistic absorption as such.
24 For an approach that frames Rousseauian persuasion in relation to presocial musicality in contrast to the modern/novelistic reading here, see Kelly, Christopher “‘To Persuade without Convincing’: The Language of Rousseau's Legislator,” American Journal of Political Science 31, no. 2 (1987): 321–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
25 Ellrich, Robert, Rousseau and His Reader: The Rhetorical Situation of the Major Works (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1969), 37Google Scholar.
26 Miller, James, Rousseau: Dreamer of Democracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1984), 66Google Scholar.
27 Mücke, Dorothea von, Virtue and the Veil of Illusion: Generic Innovation and the Pedagogical Project in Eighteenth-Century Literature (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1991), 62Google Scholar; italics mine.
28 John T. Scott, “Do You See What I See? The Education of the Reader in Rousseau's Emile,” Review of Politics 74, no. 3 (2012): 444.
29 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Emile, or On Education, trans. Bloom, Allan (New York: Basic Books, 1979), 48Google Scholar. Hereafter E.
30 Vanpée, Janie, “Rousseau's Emile, ou de l’éducation: A Resistance to Reading,” Yale French Studies 77 (1990): 156CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
31 Bloom, Allan, introduction to Emile, or On Education, by Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (New York: Basic Books, 1979), 3Google Scholar.
32 Strong, Tracy, Jean-Jacques Rousseau: The Politics of the Ordinary (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002), 108Google Scholar.
33 The distinction between “philosophical” and “novelistic” pedagogical texts and readerly expectations is, of course, itself caught up in broader generic shifts unfolding in Rousseau's context. While this essay limits its scope to the relationship between Emile’s generic innovations and Rousseau's conception of self-legislation, a fuller examination would trace Emile’s engagement with an evolving pedagogical genre. For an approach especially attentive to this engagement, see von Mücke, Virtue and the Veil of Illusion.
34 Vanpée, “Rousseau's Emile,” 173.
35 Scott, “Do You See What I See?,” 454.
36 Ray, William, “Rethinking Reading: The Novel and Cultural Stratification,” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 10, no. 2 (1988): 159Google Scholar.
37 Denise Schaeffer, Rousseau on Education, Judgment, and Freedom (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2014), 174.
38 See Ray, “Rethinking Reading,” for a different reading of the implications of such metacommentary.
39 E.g., Okin, Susan Moller, “Rousseau's Natural Woman,” Journal of Politics 41, no. 2 (1979): 393–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
40 E.g., Shell, Susan Meld, “Emile: Nature and the Education of Sophie,” in The Cambridge Companion to Rousseau, ed. Riley, Patrick (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 272–301Google Scholar.
41 Ibid., 286.
42 Schaeffer, Rousseau, 136.
43 Ahmed, Sara, The Promise of Happiness (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010), 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
44 Zerilli, Linda, Signifying Woman: Culture and Chaos in Rousseau, Burke, and Mill (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994), 18Google Scholar.
45 Wingrove, Republican Romance, 83.
46 Butler, Judith, Gender Trouble (New York: Routledge, 1990), 34Google Scholar. For an approach that, following Butler, reads Rousseau's “perverse identifications” of gender roles for a broader critique of gender, see Kennedy, Rosanne Terese, Rousseau in Drag: Deconstructing Gender (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
47 I have altered Bloom's translation from “romance” to “novel”; the French term roman implies both meanings.
48 Rancière, Jacques, The Emancipated Spectator (London: Verso, 2009), 13Google Scholar.