Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T13:19:39.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coalition Politics on the Left in France and Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Extract

The similarities between postwar France and Italy are striking. Both countries are traditionally Catholic. Both emerged from the Second World War with vital Communist organizations enjoying widespread popular support—owing in large measure to the leading roles the Communists played in their national resistance movements during World War II. Since the war, both the French and Italian Communist political parties-—by themselves—could count on commanding between one-fifth and one-fourth of the vote. France and Italy also emerged from the war with significant Christian Democratic movements and parties—-much stronger than analogous groupings in prewar days. Both countries had threatening Communist movements powerful enough to make credible attempts at seizing power without the aid of Soviet troops. And in both countries the Christian Democratic movement was a major obstacle to Communist designs. In both countries Social Democratic movements reemerged, but inferior to the Communists in cohesionand poised awkwardly between massive Communist and Catholic subcultures. In both countries a substantial part of the labor movement was dominated, not by gradualists, but by Marxist-Leninists who challengedthe very legitimacy of the regime. Not surprisingly, the character of the opposition reflected deep traditions of civic alienation, skepticism, and apathy. Finally, both countries have suffered from an ill-developed history of democratic practices, and have been notably subject to governmental instability.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See special issue, The New Corporatism: Social andl Political Structures in the Iberian World,” Review of Politics, 36 (01, 1974), esp. P. Schmitter, pp. 8788 seqGoogle Scholar.

2 The Retreat from Stalin,” Economist, 211 (05 23, 1964), p. 824Google Scholar.

3 Mclnnes, Neil, “The Christian-Marxist Dialogue: International Implications,” Survey, no. 67 (04, 1968), 68Google Scholar. As of 1975, the PCI still inclines in the Catholic direction.

4 Garaudy, Roger, From Anathema to Dialogue (New York, 1966), pp. 84, 84–85, 37, and 46–47Google Scholar.

5 Woodrow, Cf. Alain, “Pyrrhic Victory for France's Pompidou,” Commonweal, 98 (6 04, 1973), 101Google Scholar.

6 Mclnnes, , “The Christian-Marxist Dialogue,” p. 63Google Scholar.

7 Ibid., pp. 68–69.

8 Barzini, Luigi, “Letter from Italy,” Encounter, 33 (07, 1969), 79Google Scholar.

9 Kogan, Norman, “Italian Communism, the Working Class, and Organized Catholicism,” Journal of Politics, 28 (08, 1966), 554CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Cf. Giacomo Sani, “Mass Perceptions of ‘Anti-System’ Parties: The Case of Italy” (mimeo). This paper was delivered at the 1974 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association in Chicago.

11 Karol, K. S., “Togliatti Speaks His Mind,” New Statesman, 65 (24 05 1963), 790Google Scholar.

12 Kogan, , “Italian Communism, the Working Class, and Organized Catholicism,” p. 548Google Scholar.

13 See Tucker, Robert, “The Deradicalization of Marxist Movements,” American Political Science Review, 61 (06, 1967), 343358CrossRefGoogle Scholar . This valuable article is reprinted in: Tucker, Robert C., The Marxian Revolutionary Idea (New York, 1969), pp. 172214Google Scholar.