Last updated 09/07/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
The study of ethics has recently become influenced by a form of moral conservatism—a critique of “modernity” with a bias towards Aristotle. It stresses the integrity of communities and their customs, a pluralistic and particularistic respect for the diversity of human groups, the poverty of utopianism and Marxism, and the inevitability of moral and political conflict. Each stress raises major issues: the priority of social goods over human rights; hermeneutical problems of understanding between communities; difficulties for societies' shaping a common future in accordance with their moral understanding; the balance between consensus and conflict in political life. These problems are addressed in an extended form of moral conservatism which defines a number of correspondences with progressive conceptions of humanity. Referring to central facts of moral psychology and possible institutions of public communication, the discussion identifies universal human purposes whose practical implications are consistent with a postmodern society in which the course of development is settled by public deliberation.
1 Anscombe, G. E. M., “Modern Moral Philosophy,” in Ethics, Religion and Politics, Vol. 3 of her Collected Papers (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981), p. 26.Google Scholar
2 Nagel, Thomas, review of Morality and ConflictGoogle Scholar, by Hampshire, S., New York Times Book Review, 8 04 1984Google Scholar. The term moral conservatism is Nagel's.
3 MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue, A Study in Moral Theory (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981), p. 30Google Scholar. See also pp. 118–19.
4 Hampshire, Stuart, Morality and Conflict (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983), p. 166.Google Scholar
5 MacIntyre, , After Virtue, pp. 204–205.Google Scholar
6 Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983), pp. 28–29.Google Scholar
7 Ibid., p. 10. Compare MacIntyre, , After Virtue, p. 176.Google Scholar
8 Scruton, Roger, The Meaning of Conservatism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980), p. 141.Google Scholar
9 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, pp. 75, 86Google Scholar; Scruton, , The Meaning of Conservatism, p. 181.Google Scholar
10 y Gasset, José Ortega, The Revolt of the Masses (New York: W. W. Norton, 1957), p. 96.Google Scholar
11 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, pp. xiv and 192.Google Scholar
12 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 8Google Scholar. Compare MacIntyre, , After Virtue, p. 119.Google Scholar
13 Scruton, , The Meaning of Conservatism, p. 21.Google Scholar
14 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, pp. 141 and 159.Google Scholar
15 MacIntyre, , After Virtue, p. 152Google Scholar. See also p. 133.
16 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
17 Ibid., p. 28.
18 Ibid., pp. 11–12.
19 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, pp. 160 and 100.Google Scholar
20 Oakeshott, Michael, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (London: Methuen, 1974), p. 58.Google Scholar
21 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 21.Google Scholar
22 Ibid., p. 152.
23 Oakeshott, , Rationalism in Politics, pp. 1, 61, and 67.Google Scholar
24 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 136.Google Scholar
25 Ibid., p. 115
26 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, pp. 8 and 314.Google Scholar
27 Oakeshott, , Rationalism in Politics, p. 123.Google Scholar
28 Grant, George, English-Speaking Justice (Sackville, New Brunswick: Mount Allison University, 1974), p. 74.Google Scholar
29 Sandel, Michael J., Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), p. 133.Google Scholar
30 Ibid., pp. 177–79. Compare MacIntyre, , After Virtue, p. 206.Google Scholar
31 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, p. xv.Google Scholar
32 Fried, Charles, Right and Wrong (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978), p. 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, p. xv.Google Scholar
34 On these points see ibid., together with MacIntyre, , After Virtue, p. 62Google Scholar, and Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 91.Google Scholar
35 See Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, p. xvGoogle Scholar, and Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 136.Google Scholar
36 Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1978), p. 118Google Scholar. Cf. Scruton, , The Meaning of Conservatism, p. 49.Google Scholar
37 MacIntyre, , After Virtue, pp. 65–67.Google Scholar
38 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 96Google Scholar; Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, p. 7Google Scholar; Scruton, , The Meaning of Conservatism, pp. 140 and 190.Google Scholar
39 y Gasset, Ortega, The Revolt of the Masses, pp. 115–16.Google Scholar
40 Scruton, , The Meaning of Conservatism, pp. 140–41Google Scholar. Compare Grant, George, Lament for a Nation: The Defeat of Canadian Nationalism (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1979), pp. 95–96.Google Scholar
41 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 132.Google Scholar
42 Oakeshott, , Rationalism in Politics, pp. 59–79Google Scholar, and Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 149.Google Scholar
43 Cornman, James W. and Lehrer, Keith, Philosophical Problems and Arguments: An Introduction (New York: Macmillan, 1969), p. 367.Google Scholar
44 See Putnam, Hilary, Reason, Truth and History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), pp. 48–56.Google Scholar
45 Rorty, Richard, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979), p. 377.Google Scholar
46 Ibid.
47 Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Philosophical Hermeneutics, trans. Linge, D. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976), p. 9.Google Scholar
48 Compare Sandel, , Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, pp. 7–9, 133.Google Scholar
49 On considered attitudes see Hampshire, Stuart, Freedom of the Individual (London: Chatto and Windus, 1965), pp. 85–95.Google Scholar
50 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, pp. xiv and 28Google Scholar. Cf. Woodcock, George, The Crystal Spirit, A Study of George Orwell (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1966), p. 234Google Scholar. I owe this reference to Dr. Louis Greenspan.
51 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, pp. 81 and 140–52.Google Scholar
52 Scruton, , The Meaning of Conservatism, pp. 36, 134.Google Scholar
53 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 118Google Scholar. Compare Woodcock, , The Crystal Spirit, pp. 247, 285.Google Scholar
54 See Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, pp. 15, 281–84Google Scholar, and Scruton, , The Meaning of Conservatism, p. 186Google Scholar. Compare y Gasset, Ortega, The Revolt of the Masses, pp. 117–20, 122–23Google Scholar, and Woodcock, , The Crystal Spirit, p. 235.Google Scholar
55 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, p. 30.Google Scholar
56 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 116.Google Scholar
57 MacIntyre, , After Virtue, pp. 160, 206.Google Scholar
58 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 152.Google Scholar
59 Burke, , Reflections on the Revolution in France, p. 175.Google Scholar
60 Oakeshott, , Rationalism in Politics, p. 105.Google Scholar
61 Woodcock, , The Crystal Spirit, p. 282.Google Scholar
62 Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method (London: Sheed & Ward, 1975), pp. 273 and 337.Google Scholar
63 Freire, Paulo, Pedagogy of the Oppressed (New York: Seabury, 1970), pp. 91, 181–85.Google Scholar
64 Habermas, Jürgen, Legitimation Crisis (Boston: Beacon Press, 1975), pp. 102–110.Google Scholar
65 Grant, , Lament for a Nation, p. 96.Google Scholar
66 Ibid., p. 94.
67 For defense of the points in this paragraph see my article, “Emile's Moral Development: A Rousseauan Perspective on Kohlberg,” Human Development 26 (1983): 198–212.Google Scholar
68 See MacIntyre, , After Virtue, 2nd ed. (1984), p. 276.Google Scholar
69 See Habermas, , Legitimation Crisis, pp. 107–108.Google Scholar
70 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 160.Google Scholar
71 See ibid., pp. 33 and 119.
