Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T07:34:34.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Roman Question in the Diplomatic Negotiations of 1869–70

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Extract

DURING that period in which Louis Napoleon enjoyed the reputation of being the Sphinx of Europe (a reputation to which the Austrian ambassador ironically referred: “they called his words silly before he had achieved political power; now they say they are oracular”), the events which called forth perhaps his most sphinx-like behavior, were those connected with the Roman Question. The President Bonaparte who had taken it upon himself to be his uncle's nephew, must have considered the example given by the first Emperor of the French, who expelled the Pope, united Italy, and made Rome the second city of his Empire. But now in 1849 Louis Napoleon had come to be accepted by Europe not as a revolutionary, but as the man who put an end to revolution. And however he may have been tempted to revert to his youthful emulation of the other's revolutionary program, and in spite of the fact that, in his personal feelings, he was little predisposed in the Pope's favor, still his attitude toward Rome was of necessity influenced by the fact that it seemed impossible to maintain supreme power in France without the support of the conservative (French) Catholics. Thus, considerations of French inner policy made for an alternation of the ancient rivalry between France and Austria for the hegemony of Italy and for influence over the Roman court. Indeed there were those in France who went so far as to speak of the common interests that Paris and Vienna shared in Rome: now that Pius, welcomed only a few years ago as “papa angelicus,” as the national pope, had been forced to flee to Gaeta (the possession of the Napolitan “Re Bomba”), the conservative powers of Europe should unite to restore him.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Nigra to Cavour; XI/25/58. Il Carteggio Cavour I (1927), p. 219.

1 The main sources of this article are: a) unpublished: Record-Office London, Reports of Paris, Florence, Rome and Vienna (cited as R.O.); Geheimes Haus-, Hofund Staatsarchiv Wien, Berichte and Weisungen Florenz, Rom, Ministerrats-Protokolle (cited as St.A.); b) printed: Oncken, H., Rheinpolitik des Kaisers Napoleon III., 3 vol. (1926)Google Scholar, (material from German Archives, especially from St. A.); Origines Diplomatiques, de la Cuerre 1870/1 (cited as Or. dipl.); G. Lanza, Carte, ed. Count De Vecchi di Val-Cismon. — The final word will be said only when the Italian public and private archives (e.g. Count Nigra, Count Vimercati, Visconti-Venosta) are accessible. — The citations will be abbreviated as far as possible. — Ollivier, E., L'Empire libéral, XI, 375Google Scholar. Letter Napoléon 2/19/69.

2 For the French minister at Florence cf. Or. dipl. XXIX, 367 f.

3 Oncken, , op. cit., III, 247Google Scholar.

4 Carteggio Cavour, Questione Romana, II. Letter Cavour to Pantaleoni 2/21/61.

5 Paléologue, , Cespräche mit der Kaiserin Eugenie (1928), p. 71Google Scholar.

6 R.O. 8/27/69.

7 R.O. 10/18/69.

8 St. A., Florenz, 12/18/69.

9 Oncken, , op. cit., III, 196Google Scholar.

10 Lanza, , op. cit., IV, 269Google Scholar; cf. 258, 272, 287.

11 Ibid., 266.

12 Planches, E. Mayor des, “Re Vittorio Emanuele II. alia Vigilia della Guerra del Settanta,” Nuova Antologia, CCLXXXIX (1920), 351Google Scholar. Telegram of Vittorio Emanuele, 7/14/70.

13 Mayor, he. cit.; St. A., report Vitzthum 7/31.

14 Preussens Auswärtige Politik 1858–1871. III/10, 78 ff.; 186 ff.

15 Report of Kuebeck in Oncken, , op. cit. III, 273Google Scholar; St. A., report Moering 4/4/69.

16 An intensive study on the whole of the policy of Beust is being prepared by Clark, Chester W. to whom we owe the very valuable work Franz Joseph and Bismarck before 1866 (Cambridge 1934)Google Scholar.

17 Letter Count B. Rechberg to his brother 6/16/79, archive Rechberg.

18 Or. dipl. XXIX, 320 f.; 60.

19 Schnuerer, , Briefe des Kaisers Franz Joseph an seine Mutter (1930), 375Google Scholar.

20 Denkwürdigkeiten des General von Schweinitz, I, 253.

21 R.O. Lord Bloomfield 12/29/68.

22 Felix Prince Schwarzenberg, Austrian prime-minister 1848–1852.

23 Letter Metternich to Beust 3/1/69 in Oncken, op. cit. III, 118 ffGoogle Scholar.

24 Oncken, , op. cit. III, 482, 508Google Scholar.

25 Cf. my book, Craf Rechberg (1927), 88.

26 Pingaud, A., “Un Projet d'Alliance Franco-Austro-Italien,” Revue de France (1928), 417Google Scholar; Oncken, , op. cit., III, 189Google Scholar.

27 Oncken, ibid.

28 Salamon, H., L'Embassade de Richard Metlernich á Paris (1931), 231Google Scholar. St. A. report Vitzthum 2/21/70.

29 Oncken, , op. cit., I, 180Google Scholar.

30 Carieggio Cavour, Quesfione Romana, I, 109.

31 Op. cit., II, 28.

32 Oncken, , op. cit., III, 142Google Scholar.

33 Cambridge University Library (England), Add. 5641.

34 Beust, , Aus Drei Vieriel Jahrhunderten, II, 340Google Scholar; Oncken, , op. cit., 56 fGoogle Scholar.

35 Beust, , op. cit., II, 338Google Scholar.

36 Salomon, , op. cit., 419Google Scholar.

37 The very important chapter of Nigra's Memoirs on the Italian negotiations 1868 has been published by Cismon, De Vecchi di Val, “Dai Ricordi Diplomatic1 di Costantino Nigra,” Nuova Anlologia, CCCLXXI (1934)Google Scholar.

38 Oncken, , op. cit. III, 70Google Scholar; Vecchi, De, loc. cit. 187Google Scholar; Or. dipl. XXIII, 33 f.

38 Rapporto Ministero dell Interno 7/21, cf. Lanza, op. cit. V, 209Google Scholar.

39 Vecchi, De, op. cit., 188Google Scholar.

40 Oncken, , op. cit., III, 87Google Scholar.

41 R.O. Paget 3/5/69.

42 R.O. Paget 5/7,-19/69.

43 Bismarck, , Cesammdte Werke, VIb, 16 and 18Google Scholar. St. A., Berlin 4/8, 10/69.

44 St. A., Florenz, 3/15, 24/69; Or. dipl. XXIV, 37 and 85 f.

45 R.O. 5/31/69.

46 Idées Napoléoniennes, Chapter II.

47 Vecchi, De, loc. cit., 190Google Scholar; cf. letter Metternich 7/14 in Oncken, , op. cit., 215Google Scholar f.

48 Or. dipl. XXIX, 21; Jacini, S., II Tramonlo del Poiere Temporale (1931), 307Google Scholar.

49 S. A. Weisung Florenz 6/19.

50 For Gramont cf. Gorce, La, Histoire in Second Empire, VI, 151Google Scholar; the saying of Napoléon in Paléologue, , op. cit., 71Google Scholar; the letter of Beust, in Or. dipl. XXIV, 373 fGoogle Scholar. It is uncertain whether the letter was forwarded.

51 The important telegrams between Victor Emmanuel and Visconti-Venosta 7/7–15 in Mayor, , loc. cit., 337 f.Google Scholar, 351. Gramont, who took over the French Ministry of Affairs in the middle of May, was initiated by Beust into the secret negotiations at the end of this month.

52 Or. dipl. XXIX, 70.

53 Oncken, , op. cit. III, 425, 459Google Scholar.

54 Or. dipl XXIX, 11.

55 Or. dipl. XXIX, 129; Oncken, , op. cit., III, 50Google Scholar; Jacini, , Tramonto, 96Google Scholar.

56 Oncken, , op. cit., III, 483 f.Google Scholar; Or. dipl. XXIX, 281.

56 St. A. 7/27, telegram Kuebeck.

57 “II governo del Re in ciò che lo concerne, si confermá esattamente agli obblighi che resultano per lui dalle stipulazioni di 1864” Or. dipl. XXIX, 309, 395, f.; R.O. Pagel 8/22. — For the decision taken by the Council of Ministers cf. Lanza, , Carte, VI, 401Google Scholar.

58 Or. dipl. XXIX, 361, 372 f., 385, 389 f.

59 Loc. cit. 402.

60 Oncken, , op. cit. III, 513Google Scholar.

61 St. A. 8/23d. 25th, 26th; Kuebeck.

62 Jacini, , Tramonto, 303, 315Google Scholar; cf. 307 f.

63 R.O. Jervoise, 9/29; Bismarck, Ces. W. VI B. 452Google Scholar.

64 Lanza, , op. cit. V, 262Google Scholar; R.O. Paget, 8/25th, 29th; St. A. Kuebeck, 8/27. Cf. Halperin, S. W., Italy and the Vatican at War (Chicago, 1939), 31 fGoogle Scholar.

65 Jacini, S., La Polilica Ecclesiastica Italiana da Villafranca a Porla Pia (1938), 336Google Scholar.

66 Lanza, , op. cit. VI, 404Google Scholar.

67 Halperin, , op. cit. 40Google Scholar.

68 St. A. Rom, 10/6.

69 Lanza, , op. cit. VI, 405Google Scholar; for the circular note of Visconti-Venosta 9/7, cf. Halperin, , op. cit. 43Google Scholar.

70 Lanza, , op. cit., VI, 406Google Scholar.

71 R.O. Jervoise, 9/7th, 8th, 11th.

71a My article “Die Krise des Jahres 1864 in Österreich,” Hislorische Studien A. F. Pribam dargebrachl (Wien, 1929), 141 fGoogle Scholar.

72 Auswärtige Politic Preussens, 102 f., report Arnim 8/2/68.

73 Jacini, , Politico Ecclesiastica, 345Google Scholar.

74 R.O. Jervoise, 9/21st, 25th, 27th.

75 R.O. Paget, 9/29.

76 St. A. Rom, 9/28.

77 Hübner, A. v., Sixtus V., I, 58Google Scholar.

78 Gregorovius, F., The Roman Journal (1911), 389Google Scholar.

79 St. A. Hůbner, Rom., 1/4/66. For the reaction of European public opinion concerning the events of September 20th cf. Halperin, , op. cit. 70 fGoogle Scholar.