Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T08:17:49.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The “Withering” of the State Under Khrushchev

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

George A. Brinkley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Khrushchev has by now made an undeniable reputation for himself as a clever man. He has credit for the “de-Stalinization” of the Soviet system and a return to “Leninism,” but he also holds the reins to a system of controls largely created by Stalin. It is perhaps a bit early for judgments, but Khrushchev seems indeed to be having his cake and eating it too. A survey of the question of the transition to communism, for example, reveals that his position is nothing less than a synthesis of a most remarkable sort, and one well calculated to gain the benefits of both Stalinism and Leninism. He has apparently set out to achieve a wedding between controls and ideals which will both mark him as the builder of communism in the manner of Lenin and at the same time retain in his hands the power of a dictator.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 1961 , pp. 37 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Manifesto of the Communist Party, 1848,” in Eastman, M., ed., Capital and Other Writings by Karl Marx (New York, Modern Library, 1932), p. 343Google Scholar.

2 Marx, K. and Engels, F., Selected Works (Moscow, Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1950), Vol. II, 138Google Scholar.

3 Lenin, V. I., “Gosudarstvo i revoliutsiia,” 1918, Sochineniia (3rd ed., Moscow, Partizdat, 1935), Vol. XXI, 431Google Scholar.

4 lbid., p. 432.

5 Ibid., p. 435.

6 Lenin, V. I., “O gosudarstve,” 1919, Sochineniia, Vol. XXIV, 377Google Scholar.

7 Lenin, V. I., “Gosudarstvo i revoliutsiia,” op cit., Vol. XXI, 432Google Scholar.

8 Ibid., p. 436.

9 Stalin, J., “The Results of the First Five-Year Plan,” Report to the Central Committee of the C.P.S.U. (b), Jan. 7, 1933, Problems of Leninism (Moscow, Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1953), p. 538Google Scholar.

10 Stalin, J., “Report to the 17th Congress,” op. cit., pp. 631–632Google Scholar.

11 Stalin, J., “On the Draft Constitution,” Report to the 8th Congress of Soviets, 11 25, 1936, op. cit., pp. 690, 698–699Google Scholar.

12 Stalin, J., “Report to the 18th Congress of the C.P.S.U. (b),” 03 10, 1939, op. cit., p. 793Google Scholar.

13 Ibid., p. 797.

14 Khrushchev, N. S., Report to the 21st Congress of the C.P.S.U., Pravda, 01 28, 1959, pp. 2–10Google Scholar; Current Digest of the Soviet Press, XI, No. 5 (03 11, 1959), 13Google Scholar.

15 N. S. Khrushchev, op. cit.; Current Digest, XI, No. 3 (02 25, 1959), 8–9Google Scholar; No. 5 (March 11, 1959), 16.

16 See also his speech to the Hungarian C.P. Congress, New York Times, Dec. 2, 1959, p. 4.

17 Khrushchev, , Pravda, 01 28, 1959, pp. 2–10Google Scholar; Current Digest, XI, No. 5 (03 11, 1959), 13–17Google Scholar. Cf Denisov, A. I., “O sootnoshenii gosudarstva i obshchestva v perekhodnyi ot kapitalizma k kommunizmu period,” Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, No. 4 (04, 1960), 29–40Google Scholar.

18 See Stepanian, Ts., “O zakonomcrnostiakh pererastaniia sotsializma v kommunizm,” Kommunist, No. 14 (09, 1959), 33–46Google Scholar. For an idyllic description of what full communism will be like see Strumilin, S., “What Communism Is: Thoughts About the Future,” Oktiabr, No. 3 (03, 1960), 140–146Google Scholar; Current Digest, XII, No. 15 (05 11, 1960), 11–14Google Scholar.

19 Pravda, Dec. 26, 1958, pp. 7–8; Current Digest, XI, No. 1 (02 11, 1959), 3–11Google Scholar.

20 A detailed discussion of the significance and provisions of the new Code may be found in Schapiro, L., “Judicial Practice and Legal Reform,” Soviet Survey, No. 29 (07–09, 1959), 54–60Google Scholar. Texts are in Pravda and Izvestiia, Dec. 25, 26, 1958.

21 “Ob uchastii trudiashchikhsia v okhrane obshchestvennogo poriadka,” Pravda, March 10, 1959, p. 1; Current Digest, XI, No. 10 (04 8, 1959), 3Google Scholar.

22 For examples, see Pravda, Dec. 10, 1958, p. 6, and Izvestiia, Feb. 15, 1959, p. 4 and March 11, 1959, p. 2.

23 Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, No. 10 (10, 1959), 16–27, 28–35Google Scholar.

24 “Zakon o povyshenii roli obshchestvennosti v bor'be s narusheniiami sovetskoi zakonnosti i pravil sotsialisticheskogo obshchezhitiia,” Izvestiia, Oct. 23, 1959, p. 2; “Primernoe polozhenie o tovarishcheskikh sudakh,” Izvestiia, Oct. 24, 1959, p. 2; Current Digest, XI, No. 43 (11 25, 1959), 13–17Google Scholar.

25 For commentary on the provisions of the drafts and some suggestions for their modification, see the series of articles entitled “Obsuzhdenie proekta zakona o povyshenii roli obshchestvennosti v bor'be s narusheniiami sovetskoi zakonnosti i pravil sotsialisticheskogo obshchezhitiia,” in Souetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, No. 12 (12, 1959), 92–117Google Scholar.

26 Special provision is made for minors by the creation of Commissions under each Soviet executive committee with powers to deal with all delinquents from the age of 11, and with their parents. In this case, however, the activity is more closely tied to state agencies, MVD and health agencies, although some members of the public organizations may be drawn into the work. See “Primernoe polozhenie o komissiiakh po delam nesovershennoletnikh,” Izvestiia, Oct. 24, 1959, p. 2.

27 Krokodil, No. 3, 1960, 11Google Scholar.

28 Ivanov, V., Pchelin, V., and Sakov, M., “Vozrastanie roli partii v stroitel'stve kommunizma,” Kommunist, No. 17 (11, 1959), 3–20Google Scholar; Current Digest, XII, No. 1 (02 3, 1960), 3–7Google Scholar.

29 Il'ichev, L., “Voprosy kommunisticheskogo vospitaniia trudiashchikhsia,” Kommunist, No. 14 (09, 1959), 48Google Scholar.