Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T06:43:00.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dilatation or surgery for heart valve stenosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2008

S Ikram  and
RJC Hall
S Ikram*
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
RJC Hall
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
*
S Ikram, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XW, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Clinical geriatrics
Information
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 33 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Office of Population Census and Surveys. Popul Trends 1990; 62: 43.Google Scholar
2 Aranki, SF, Rizzo, RJ, Couper, GS et al. Aortic valve replacement in the elderly: effect of gender and coronary artery disease on operative mortality. Circulation 1993; 88 (suppl II): 17–23.Google ScholarPubMed
3 Mullins, CE, Ludomirsky, A, O'Laughlin, MP et al. Balloon valvuloplasty for pulmonic stenosis-2-year follow-up: haemodynamic and Doppler evaluation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1988; 14: 76–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Cribier, A, Savin, T, Saoudi, N et al. Percutaneous transluminal valvuloplasty of acquired aortic stenosis in the elderly: an alternative to valve replacement? Lancet 1986; i; 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Safian, RD, Berman, AD, Diver, DJ. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in 170 consecutive patients. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 125–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Kuntz, RE, Tosteson, ANA, Berman, AD. Predictors of event-free survival after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. N Engl J Med 1988; 325: 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Block, PC. Aortic valvuloplasty-a valid alternative? N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 169–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Inoue, K, Owaki, T, Nakamura, T, Kitamura, F, Miyamoto, N. Clinical application of transvenous mitral commissurotomy by a new balloon catheter. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984; 87: 394–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Tuzcu, EM, Block, PC, Griffiths, BP et al. Immediate and long term outcome of percutaneous mitral valvotomy in patients 65 years and older. Circulation 1992; 85: 963–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Le Feuvre, C, Bonan, R, Lachurie, ML et al. Balloon mitral commissurotomy in patients aged > 70 years. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 233–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Chizner, MA, Pearle, DL, Deleon, AC Jr. The natural history if aortic stenosis in adults. Am Heart J 1980; 99: 419–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Ross, J Jr, Braunwald, E. Aortic stenosis. Circulation 1968; 38 (suppl 5): 61–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Bergus, BO, Feng, WC, Bert, AA, Singh, AK. Aortic valve replacement (AVR): influence of age on operative morbidity and mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992; 6: 118–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Azariades, M, Fessler, CL, Ahmad, A, Starr, A. Aortic valve replacement in patients over 80 years of age: a comparative standard for balloon valvuloplasty. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1991; 5: 373–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Pasic, M, Carrel, T, Laske, A et al. Valve replacement in octagenarians: increased early mortality but good long-term result. Eur Heart J 1992; 13: 508–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Bernard, Y, Etievent, J, Mourand, JL et al. Long-term results of percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty compared with aortic valve replacement in patients more than 75 years old. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 796–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Sprigings, DC, Jackson, G, Chambers, JB et al. Balloon dilatation of the ‘aortic valve’ for inoperable aortic stenosis. Br Med J 1988; 297: 1007–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Galloway, AC, Colvin, SB, Grossi, EA et al. Ten year experience with aortic valve replacement in 482 patients 70 years of age or older: operative risk and long-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49: 84–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Culliford, AT, Galloway, AC, Colvin, SB et al. Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in persons aged 80 years and over. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67: 1256–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Taylor, R. Evolution of the continuity equation in the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the severity of valvular aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1990; 3 (4): 326–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Oleson, KH. The natural history of 271 patients with mitral stenosis under medical treatment. Br Heart J 1962; 24: 349–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Turi, ZG, Reyes, VP, Raju, S et al. Percutaneous balloon versus surgical close commissurotomy for mitral stenosis. A prospective randomised trial. Circulation 1991; 83: 1179–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Raju, BS, Turi, ZG, Raju, R et al. Three and one-half year follow-up of a randomised trial comparing percutaneous balloon and surgical closed mitral commissurotomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 429A.Google Scholar
24 Bueno, R, Andrade, P, Nercolini, D et al. Percutaneous balloon mitral valvuolplasty versus open mitral valve commissurotomy. Results of a ranodomised clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 429A.Google Scholar
25 Complications and mortality of percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy. A report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry. Circulation 1992; 85: 2014–2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Department of Health. UK heart valve registry. Repot 1988.Google Scholar
27 Freeman, WK, Hartzell, VS, O'Brien, PC et al. Cardiac surgery in the octogenarian: perioperative outcome and clinical follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 29–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28 Manga, P, Singh, S, Brandis, S. Left ventricular perforation during percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992; 25: 317–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29 Ribeiro, PA, Zaibag, M, Rajendran, V et al. Mechanism of mitral valve area increase by in vitro single and double balloon mitral valvotomy. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62: 264–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30 Cheng, TO. Percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty: are Chinese and Western experiences compatible Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994; 31: 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31 Palacios, IF, Block, PC, Wilkins, GT, Weyman, AE. Follow up of patients undergoing percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy. Circulation 1989; 79: 573–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32 Manning, WJ, Reis, GJ, Douglas, PS. Use of transoesophageal echocardiography to detect left atrial thrombi before percutaneous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve: a prospective study. Br Heart J 1992; 67: 170–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33 Medina, A, DeLezo, JS, Hernandez, E et al. Balloon valvuloplasty for mitral restenosis after previous surgery: a comparative study. Am Heart J 1990; 120. 568–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34 Department of Health. UK heart valve registry. Report 1992.Google Scholar
35 Cheng, TO. Concurrent multivalve balloon valvuloplasty. In: Cheng, TO ed. Percutaneous baloon valvuloplasty. New York: Igaku-Shoin, 1992: 468–90.Google Scholar
36 Nair, CK, Biddle, WP, Kaneshiege, A et al. Ten-year experience with mitral valve replacement in the elderly. Am Heart J 1992; 124: 154–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37 Pomerantz, RM, Diver, DJ, Safian, RD. Concurrent balloon valvuloplasty and coronary angioplasty. In: Cheng, TO ed. Percutaneous baloon valvuloplasty. New York: Igaku-Shoin, 1992: 491–97.Google Scholar