Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T03:23:55.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Living wills: anticipatory decisions and advance directives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2008

Charles A Erin*
Affiliation:
The Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
John Harris
Affiliation:
The Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
*
Charles A Erin, The Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, University of Manchester, Humanities Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Occasional paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1British Medical Association. BMA statement on advance directives. London: BMA, 1992: 111.Google Scholar
2In re Quinlan, 355 A2d 647, (NJ 1976).Google Scholar
3High, DM.‘All in the family: extended autonomy and expectations in surrogate health care decision making. Gerontologist 1988; 28: 4651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Cohen-Mansfield, J, Droge, JA, Billig, N.Factors influencing hospital patients’ preferences in the utilization of life-sustaining treatments. Gerontologist 1992; 32: 8995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Henderson, M.Beyond the living will. Gerontologist 1990; 30: 480–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Miller, T, Cugliari, AM.Withdrawing and withholding treatment: policies in long-term care facilities. Gerontologist 1990; 30: 462–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Diamond, E, Jernigan, JA, Mosely, RA, Messina, V, McKeown, RA.Decision-making ability and advance directive preferences in nursing home patients and proxies. Gerontologist 1989; 29: 622–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health, (SCt 1990), 497 US 261,110 SCt 2841, 1990.Google Scholar
9Cruzan v Harmon, Missouri Supreme Court, 760 SW2d 408, 1988.Google Scholar
10Emanuel, LL, Barry, MJ, Stoeckle, JD, Ettelson, LM, Emanuel, EJ.Advance directives for medical care – a case for greater use. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 889–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Gamble, ER, McDonald, PJ, Lichstein, PR.Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour of elderly persons regarding living wills. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 277–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Harris, J.Wonderwoman and superman: the ethics of human biotechnology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
13Harris, J.The value of life: an introduction to medical ethics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985.Google Scholar
14Harris, J.Does justice require that we be ageist? Bioethics 1994; 8: 7484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Harris, J.Violence and responsibility. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980.Google Scholar
16Wachter, RM, Lo, B.Advance directives for patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Crit Care Clin 1993; 9: 125–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17The Terrence Higgins Trust and King's College London. Living will. London: Terrence Higgins Trust and King's College London, 1992.Google Scholar
18Emanuel, LL, Emanuel, EJ.The medical directive: a new comprehensive advance care document. JAMA 1989; 261: 3288–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Dworkin, R.Life's dominion. London: Harper Collins, 1993.Google Scholar