Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T05:56:34.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinematics and inverse dynamics analysis for a novel 3-PUU parallel mechanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

Wang Liping ,
Xu Huayang  and
Guan Liwen
Wang Liping
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Xu Huayang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Guan Liwen*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: guanlw@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The modules of parallel tool heads with 2R1T degrees of freedom (DOFs), i.e., two rotational DOFs and one translational DOF, have become so important in the field of machine tools that corresponding research studies have attracted extensive attention from both academia and industry. A 3-PUU (P represents a prismatic joint, U represents a universal joint) parallel mechanism with 2R1T DOFs is proposed in this paper, and a detailed discussion about its architecture, geometrical constraints, and mobility characteristics is presented. Furthermore, on the basis of its special geometrical constraint, we derive and explicitly express the parasitic motion of the 3-PUU mechanism. Then, the inverse kinematics problem, the Jacobian matrix calculation and the forward kinematics problem are also investigated. Finally, with a simplified dynamics model, the inverse dynamics analysis for the mechanism is carried out with the Principle of Virtual Work, and corresponding results are compared with that of the 3-PRS mechanism. The above analyses illustrate that the 3-PUU parallel mechanism has good dynamics features, which validates the feasibility of applying this mechanism as a tool head module.

Keywords

Parallel mechanism3-PUU2R1T DOFskinematics analysisdynamics analysis
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 35 , Issue 10 , October 2017 , pp. 2018 - 2035
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tsai, L.-W., Robot Analysis: The Mechanics of Serial and Parallel Manipulators. (Wiley, New York, 1999).Google Scholar
2. Merlet, J. P., Parallel Robots (Springer, New York, 2005).Google Scholar
3. Liu, X.-J. and Wang, J., Parallel Kinematics: Type, Kinematics, and Optimal Design (Springer, New York, 2013).Google Scholar
4. Wahl, J., Articulated Tool Head. WIPO Patent No. WO 00/25976; 2000.Google Scholar
5. Pierrot, F., Reynaud, C. and Fournier, A., “Delta: A simple and efficient parallel robot,” Robotica 8 (2), 105–109 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Han, J., Huang, Q. and Chang, T., “Research on Space Docking HIL Simulation System Based on Stewart 6-DOF Motion System,” Proceedings of the 7th JFPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, Toyama (2008) pp. 213–218.Google Scholar
7. Tsai, L.-W. and Joshi, S., “Kinematic analysis of 3-DOF position mechanisms for use in hybrid kinematic machines,” Trans. ASME: J. Mech. Des. 124 (2), 245–253 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Tsai, M. S. and Yuan, W. H., “Dynamics modeling and decentralized control of a 3PRS parallel mechanism based on constrained robotic analysis,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 63 (3), 525–545 (2011).Google Scholar
9. Li, Y. and Xu, Q., “Kinematics and dynamics analysis for a general 3-PRS spatial parallel mechanism,” Robotica 23 (2), 219–29 (2005).Google Scholar
10. Tsai, M. S. and Yuan, W. H., “Inverse dynamics analysis for a 3-PRS parallel mechanism based on a special decomposition of the reaction forces,” Mech. Mach. Theory 45, 491–508 (2010).Google Scholar
11. Li, Y. and Xu, Q, “Kinematic analysis of a 3-PRS parallel manipulator,” Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 23 (4), 395–408 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Liu, X.-J. and Bonev, I. A., “Orientation capability, error analysis, and dimensional optimization of two articulated tool heads with parallel kinematics,” J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 130 (1), 011015-1–9 (2008).Google Scholar
13. Pond, G. and Carretero, J. A., “Architecture optimization of three 3-PRS variants for parallel kinematic machining,” Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 25 (1), 64–72 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Li, Q., Chen, Z., Chen, Q., Wu, C. and Hu, X., “Parasitic motion comparison of 3-PRS parallel mechanism with different limb arrangement,” Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 27 (2), 389–396 (2011).Google Scholar
15. Huang, T. and Liu, H. T., “A parallel device having double rotation freedoms and one translation freedom,” PCT Patent NO. WO 2007/124637.Google Scholar
16. Chen, X. et al., “A comparison study on motion/force transmissibility of two typical 3-DOF parallel manipulators: The Sprint Z3 and A3 tool heads,” Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 11, 1–10 (2014).Google Scholar
17. Li, Q. and Herve, J. M., “1T2R parallel mechanisms without parasitic motion,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 26, 401–410 (2010).Google Scholar
18. Xie, F., Liu, X.-J. and Wang, J., “A 3-DOF parallel manufacturing module and its kinematic optimization,” Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 28 (3), 334–343 (2012).Google Scholar
19. Tsai, L.-W., “Systematic enumeration of parallel manipulators,” TR 1998-33, Institute for systems research, University of Maryland, USA, 1998.Google Scholar
20. Tsai, L.-W., Mechanism Design: Enumeration of Kinematic Structures According to Function (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2000).Google Scholar
21. Giberti, H., Righettini, P. and Tasora, A., “Design and Experimental Test of a Pneumatic Translational 3dof Parallel Manipulator,” Proceeding of the 10th International Workshop on Robotics in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region, Vienna, Austria (May 16–18, 2001).Google Scholar
22. Li, Y. and Xu, Q., “A new approach to the architecture optimization of a general 3-PUU translational parallel manipulator,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 46 (1), 59–72 (2006).Google Scholar
23. Li, Y. and Xu, Q., “Stiffness analysis for a 3-PUU PKM,” Mech. Mach. Theory 43, 186–200 (2008).Google Scholar
24. Dasgupta, B. and Mruthyunjaya, T. S., “A newton-euler formulation for the inverse dynamics of the Stewart platform manipulator,” Mech. Mach. Theory 33 (13), 1135–1152 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Lee, K.-M. and Shah, D. K., “Dynamic analysis of a tree-degrees-of-freedom in-parallel actuated manipulator,” IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 4 (3), 361–367 (1988).Google Scholar
26. Li, B., Wang, Z. and Li, J., “Study on the dynamics of novel parallel mechanisms base on Kane's equation,” Mech. Sci. Technol. Aerospace Eng. 18 (1), 41–43 (1999) (Chinese).Google Scholar
27. Tsai, L.-W., “Solving the inverse dynamics of a Stewart-Gough manipulator by the principle of virtual work,” J. Mech. Des. 122 (1), 3–9 (2000).Google Scholar
28. Huang, Z., Liu, J. F. and Zeng, D. X., “A general methodology for mobility analysis of mechanisms based on constraint screw theory,” Sci. China, Series E: Technol. Sci., 52 (5), 1337–1347 (2009).Google Scholar
29. Zhao, J. S., Zhou, K. and Feng, Z. J., “A theory of degrees of freedom for mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 39, 621–643 (2004).Google Scholar
30. Liping, W., Huayang, Xu and Liwen, G., “Mobility analysis of parallel mechanisms based on screw theory and mechanism topology,” Adv. Mech. Eng. 7 (11), 1–13 (2015).Google Scholar
31. Bonev, I. A., Geometric Analysis of Parallel Mechanisms Ph.D. Thesis (Quebec, Canada: Laval University, 2002).Google Scholar