Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-11T08:22:26.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VII: MULTIPLE PETITIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
Royal Historical Society Camden Fifth Series , Volume 52: EARLY COMMON PETITIONS IN THE ENGLISH PARLIAMENT, c.1290–c.1420 , July 2017 , pp. 191 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The second ‘ne’ is probably a scribal error arising from a line break between the repeated ‘ne's.

2 C 54/127: ‘leur’.

3 C 54/127: ‘tieux’.

4 C 54/127: ‘solonc’.

5 C 54/127: ‘seygnur’.

6 C 54/127: ‘leur’.

7 C 54/127: ‘grantez’.

8 C 54/127: ‘pur’.

9 C 54/127: ‘e’.

10 C 54/127: ‘le’.

11 This text is not interlineated in C 54/127.

12 C 54/127: ‘faite’.

13 C 54/127: ‘plusurs’.

14 Crossed out.

15 The words ‘enquergent facent’ have been deleted here.

16 Illegible.

17 This item is crossed out.

18 This is the response to both items 18 and 19.

19 Illegible due to tear in parchment: supplied from context.

20 The document is damaged and parts of the text are illegible and irrecoverable.

21 This item is on a strip of parchment fixed to the document lower down its face. A mark indicates that it is a continuation of the response to item 3.

22 Conjectural.

23 Illegible: supplied from context.

24 From this point onwards, four or five words are illegible at the end of each line.

25 Sic: the correct form would have been the past participle of the verb deseser.

26 Two words are illegible here due to a stain on the right-hand side of the parchment.

27 Illegible due to stain on right-hand side of parchment, and supplied from RP, I, 430.

28 From this note onwards, the text continues on the dorse of the document.

29 This item is crossed out.

30 This item has been crossed out.

31 These words are struck through.

32 Conjectural.

33 Conjectural.

34 Interpolation in another hand.

35 The text is faded.

36 A section of the parchment is missing from the left-hand side of SC 8/272/13584.

37 Substituted for ‘solonc com qe’.

38 The majority of text on the right-hand side of the document is illegible due to a stain on the parchment.

39 The upper section of the parchment is damaged; where possible, missing text has been supplied from the context.

40 The bottom right-hand corner of the parchment is missing.

41 The document is slightly damaged: missing text has been supplied from Record Commission Transcripts, PRO 31/7/110, no. 31.

42 Illegible due to tear in parchment: supplied from context.