Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T20:35:19.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Single True Morality? The Challenge of Relativism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Extract

Ethical objectivists hold that there is one and only one correct system of moral beliefs. From such a standpoint it follows that conflicting basic moral principles cannot both be true and that the only moral principles which are binding on rational human agents are those described by the single true morality. However sincerely they may be held, all other moral principles are incorrect. Objectivism is an influential tradition, covering most of the rationalist and naturalist standpoints which have dominated nineteenth and twentieth century moral philosophy: there is widespread agreement amongst relativists themselves that objectivism is firmly rooted in common sense.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I use the term ‘objectivism’ rather than ‘universalism’ since the existence of principles applicable to all rational human agents is consistent with these principles not being recognised by some agents.

2 An exception is Gilbert Harman who holds that relativism is a common- sense view. See Harman, 1975, 1977, 1978a, 1978b.

3 K. Nielsen, for example, lists twelve different interpretations which may be placed on Westermarck's views. See Nielsen (1982) pp. 126.