Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T03:47:06.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Abstract Morality, Concrete Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Stephen R. L. Clark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Practitioners of disciplines whose problems are debated by moral philosophers regularly complain that the philosophers are engaged in abstract speculation, divorced from ‘real-life’ consequences and responsibilities, that it is the practitioners (doctor, research scientist, politician) who must take the decisions, and that they cannot (and should not) act in accordance with strict abstract logic.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 22: Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Problems , September 1987 , pp. 35 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Aristotle, (1915) I, 1096a11ff.Google Scholar

2 Locke, (1959) 115Google Scholar; see Weinsheimer, (1984) 21.Google Scholar

3 See Geach, (1969) 117.Google Scholar

4 Berkeley, (1948–1957) II, 84.Google Scholar

5 Mooney, (1985) 124Google Scholar, after Vico.

6 Whateley, (1832) 85.Google Scholar

7 See Martin, (1975) 128.Google Scholar

8 See Martin, (1981) 85.Google Scholar

9 Newman, (1979) 45.Google Scholar

10 See Russell, (1983) 21.Google Scholar

11 Yeats, (1955) 169.Google Scholar

12 Vico, (1982) 71 (De Italorum Sapientia I.7.5).Google Scholar

13 Berkeley, (1948–1957) I, 82Google Scholar (Locke), III, 324 (Spinoza); see Clark, (1985).Google Scholar

14 Mooney, (1985) 122.Google Scholar

15 Aristotle, (1915) II, 1107a lff.Google Scholar

16 Aristotle, (1915) V, 1137b l2ff.Google Scholar

17 Weinsheimer, (1984) 27.Google Scholar

18 Peirce, (1931–1935) 6.288.Google Scholar

19 MacIntyre, (1981) 233.Google Scholar

20 MacIntyre, (1981) 215.Google Scholar

21 MacIntyre, (1981) 235.Google Scholar

22 Jones, (1977) 71Google Scholar; see Clark, (1987b).Google Scholar

23 Weinsheimer, (1984) 24.Google Scholar

24 Martin, (1981) 150.Google Scholar

25 Martin, (1981) 66.Google Scholar

26 MacIntyre, (1981) 236.Google Scholar

27 Berkeley, (1948–1957) VI, 57Google Scholar (Advice to the Tories).

28 MacIntyre, (1981) 237.Google Scholar

29 MacIntyre, (1981) 245.Google Scholar

30 Clark, (1983), (1986), (1987a).Google Scholar

31 Newman, (1979) 88.Google Scholar

32 MacIntyre, (1981) 242.Google Scholar

33 Gray, (1967) xviii.Google Scholar

34 Berkeley, (1948–1957) VI, 63, 79Google Scholar (Essay toward preventing the Ruin of Great Britain).

35 Berkeley, (1948–1957) III, 297 (Euphranor speaks).Google Scholar

36 Berkeley, (1948–1957) VI, 219Google Scholar; see III, 23, I, 63.

37 Dotson Rader, a 1968 Columbia University revolutionist, cited by Martin, (1981) 64.Google Scholar

38 Lewis, (1952) 162.Google Scholar

39 Rader, (Martn (1981) 64).Google Scholar

40 Martin, (1981) 73.Google Scholar

41 Martin, (1981) 148.Google Scholar

42 Berkeley, (1948–1957) VI, 20.Google Scholar

43 Berkeley, (1948–1957) III, 129 (Crito speaks).Google Scholar

44 Berkeley, (1948–1957) III, 143 (Euphranor speaks), 176 (Crito speaks).Google Scholar

45 Berkeley, (1948–1957) VII, 225Google Scholar; see Leary, (1977).Google Scholar

46 Blake, (1966) 671Google Scholar (Descriptive Catalogue).