Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T14:45:49.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ghost of the Tractatus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Extract

Wittgenstein was unreliable as an historian of philosophy. When he criticised other philosophers he rarely gave chapter and verse for his criticism, and on the rare occasions on which he quoted verbatim he did not always do justice to the authors quoted. I will illustrate this first in the comparatively unimportant case of Augustine and then in the more serious case of Frege.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 2 note 1 Confessions, 1, 8Google Scholar: cum gemitibus et vocibus variis et variis membrorum motibus, edere vellem sensa cordis mei, ut voluntati paretur.

page 2 note 2 Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, ed. Geach, Peter and Black, Max (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1960)Google Scholar (hereafter GB), p. 63.Google Scholar