Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T18:22:05.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
References
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anscombe, G. E. M. and Geach, P. T. 1961. Three Philosophers: Aristotle, Aquinas, Frege. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anselm, 19401968. Anselmi Opera Omnia, ed. Schmitt, F. S., 6 vols. Rome and Edinburgh: Nelson.Google Scholar
Anselm, 1962. Saint Anselm: Basic Writings, trans. Deane, S. N., 2nd edn. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
Augustine, 1947. Christian Instruction (De doctrina Christiana), trans. J. J. Gavigan, in Schopp, L. and Defarri, R. J. (eds), The Fathers of the Church: Writings of Saint Augustine, vol. 4. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, 1961. Confessions, trans. Pine-Coffin, R. S.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Augustine, 1963. The Confessions of St. Augustine, trans. Warner, R.. New York: Mentor Books.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things With Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1936. language, Truth and Logic. London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
Bambrough, J. R. 1969. Reason, Truth and God. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bambrough, J. R. 1979. Moral Scepticism and Moral Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barrett, D. C. 1991. Wittgenstein on Ethics and Religious Belief. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barth, K. 19321970. Die kirchliche Dogmatik, 4vols., 13 parts. Chr. Kaiser and EVZ-Verlag: Munich and Zurich.Google Scholar
Bell, M. 1988. Leavis, F. R.. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bochenski, I. M. 1948. ‘On Analogy’, The Thomist xi, 424447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, C. 1968. The Well-Wrought Urn. London: Dobson.Google Scholar
Burnet, J. 1930. Early Greek Philosophy, 4th edn. London: Black.Google Scholar
Charlton, W. 1988. Philosophy and Christian Belief. London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
Clark, B. 1978. Wfiose Life Is It Anyway?. London: Amber Lane Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, T. 1979. ‘Metaphor and the Cultivation of Intimacy’, in Sacks, S. (ed.), On Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, A. 1737. A Discourse of the Grounds and Reasons of the Christian Religion. London.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. E. 1991. ‘Ineffability’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society: Supplementary Volume lxv, 115.Google Scholar
Copleston, F. 19461966. A History of Philosophy, 8 vols. London: Burns Oates.Google Scholar
Crichton, J. D. 1980. ‘A Theology of Worship’, in Jones, C., Wainwright, G. and Yarnold, E. (eds), The Study of Liturgy. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Cupitt, D. 1990. Creation out of Nothing. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1967. ‘Truth and Meaning’, Synthese xvii, 304–23. Reprinted in Davidson 1984.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1974. ‘On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47, 520. Reprinted in Davidson 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1978. ‘What Metaphors Mean’, Critical Inquiry 5, 3147. Reprinted in Davidson 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
De Wulf, M. 1930. Histoire de la philosophie medievale, Tome 3: Apres le tresieme siecle. Louvain: Institut de philosophie.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1978. Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1991. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Durrant, M. 1973a. Theology and Intelligibility. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Durrant, M. 1973b. The Logical Status of 'God’. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, M. 1989. ‘Reference and Critical Realism’, Modern Theology 5, 2, 133143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckhart, J. 1936. Meister Eckhart. Die deutchen Werke: erster band, Meister Eckhart's Predigten. Stuttgart-Berlin: W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Farrer, A. 1976. Interpretation and Belief, ed. Conti, C. C.. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, L. 1957. The Essence of Christianity, trans. Eliot, G.. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1950. The Foundations of Arithmetic, trans. Austin, J. L.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1952. ‘On Concept and Object’, in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, eds Geach, P. T. and Black, M.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frei, H. W. 1974. The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Hermeneutics. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Frost, D. L. 1973. The Language of Series 3. Bramcote: Grove Books.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. -G. 1975. Truth and Method, trans. Glen-Doepel, W.. London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. 1962. Reference and Generality: An Examination of Some Medieval and Modern Theories. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. 1969. God and the Soul. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. 1979. Truth, Love and Immortality: An Introduction toMcTaggart's Philosophy. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Gibbs, B. 1976. ‘Mysticism and the Soul’, The Monist 59, 4, 532–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosse, E. 1935. Father and Son: A Study of Two Temperaments. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Greene, G. 1948. The Heart of the Matter. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1968. ‘Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning’, Foundations of Language 4, 225242. Reprinted in Grice 1989.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1975. ‘Logic and Conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Grice 1989.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass, and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. P. 1991. ‘Kant's Psychological Hedonism’, Philosophy 66, 207216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorne, C. 1969. ‘The God of Religion and the God of Philosophy’, in Vesey, G. N. A. (ed.), Talk of God, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures. London and New York: Macmillan and St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Holdcroft, D. 1981. ‘Principles of Conversation, Speech Acts, and Radical Interpretation’, in Parrett, H. and Bouveresse, J. (eds), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holmyard, E. J. 1931. Makers of Chemistry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Houlden, J. L. 1974. ‘Liturgy and her Companions: a Theological Appraisal’, in Jasper, R. C. D. (ed.), The Eucharist Today: Studies on Series 3. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Ibsen, H. 1978. Brand, trans. G. Hill. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
James, W. 1956. The Will to Believe and other essays in popular philosophy. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D. E. 1967. The Glory of Man. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D. E. 1987. God, Miracle and the Church of England. London: SCM.Google Scholar
John of the Cross 1978. The Complete Works of Saint John of the Cross, trans. Pears, E. A.. Wheathampstead: Clarke.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1925. Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Ethics, trans. T. K. Abbott. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1948. The Moral Law or Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. H. J. Paton. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Karrer, O. (ed.) 1926 Meister Eckehart. Munich: J. Miiller.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1967. ‘Criterion’, in Edwards, P. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 8 vols. New York and London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1983. Faith and Reason. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. 1939. Fear and Trembling, trans. R. Payne. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. 1954. Fear and Trembling, trans. W. Lowrie. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. and Schofield, M. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, E. F. 1987. Metaphor: Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kugel, J. L. 1981. The Idea of Biblical Poetry: Parallelism and its History. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lamarque, P. 1982. ‘Metaphor and Reported Speech: In Defence of a Pragmatic Theory’, Journal of Literary Semantics 11, 1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarque, P. (ed.) 1983. Philosophy and Fiction: Essays in Literary Aesthetics. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Lamarque, P. 1985. ‘Philosophical Theories of Metaphor’, Studies in Philosophy 10, 113.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1959. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, 2 vols, ed. A.C. Fraser. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. 1960. ‘Anselm's Ontological Arguments’, The Philosophical Review, 69, 4162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, H. 1987. God Matters. London: Chapman.Google Scholar
Millar, A. and Riches, J. K. 1981. ‘Interpretation: A Theoretical Perspective and Some Applications’, Numen xxviii, 1, 2953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. 1973. The Justification of Religious Belief. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. 1980. Morality: Religious and Secular: Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. 1990. ‘The Place of Symbols in Christianity’, in his How to Play Theological Ping-Pong and Other Essays on Faith and Reason. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Morris, T. V. (ed.) 1987a. The Concept of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, T. V. 1987b. ‘The God of Abraham, Isaac and Anselm’, in his Anselmian Explorations: Essays in Philosophical Theology. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Mortimer, J. 1991. ‘The Monsignorat Ninety’, The Spectator 6th July, 1921.Google Scholar
Nicholas of Cusa 1913. De docta ignorantia libri tres. Testo latino con note di Paolo Rotta. Bari: G. Laterza.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. W. 1974. The Gay Science, trans. Kaufmann, W.. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
OED 1971. The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. 1931. Contribution to BBC symposium Science and Religion, broadcast 1930. London: G. Howe.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. H. 1978. The Structure of Literary Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S. H. 1987. The End of Liter?ry Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascal, B. 1966. Pensees, trans. A. J. Krailsheimer. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1967. God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Plato, 1963. The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Including the Letters, eds , E.Hamilton, and Cairns, H.. New York: Bollingen Foundation.Google Scholar
Quinton, A. M. 1985. The Divergence of the Twain: Poet's Philosophy and Philosopher's Philosophy. Coventry: University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Rahner, H. 1955. ‘The Christian Mystery and the Pagan Mysteries’, in Campbell, J. (ed.), Pagan and Christian Mysteries: Papers from the Eranos Yearbooks. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1969. The Symbolism of Evil, trans. Buchanan, E.. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1970. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, trans. Savage, D.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1980. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism (Essays: 1972-1980). Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. F. 1961. ‘Analogy as a Rule of Meaning for Religious Language’, International Philosophical Quarterly 1, 468502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. F. 1981. Portraying Analogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1921. Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Sartre, J. -P. 1948. Existentialism and Humanism, trans. Mairet, P.. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1979. ‘Metaphor’, in his Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalley, B. 1952. The Study of the Bible in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smart, N. 1972. The Concept of Worship. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soskice, J. M. 1985. Metaphor and Religious Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Strange, R. 1990. ‘The Flame of Love: Reflections on Newman's “Dream of Gerontius”’, Priests and People 4, 11, 442445.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1969. ‘Meaning and Truth’. Inaugural lecture at the University of Oxford. Reprinted in Strawson 1971.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1971. Logico-Linguistic Papers. London: MethuenGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, S. 1977. Atheism and the Rejection of God: Contemporary Philosophy and The Brothers Karamazov. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sutherland, S. 1980. ‘Saintliness and Sanity’, Scottish Journal of Religious Studies 1,1, 4561.Google Scholar
Sutherland, S. 1984a. Faith and Ambiguity. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Sutherland, S. 1984b. God, Jesus and Belief: The Legacy of Theism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas 1936. De Unitate Intellectus, ed. Keeler, L. W.. Rome: Gregorian University. (1946. The Unicity of the Intellect, trans. R.E. Brennan. St Louis: Herder.)Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas 19641981. Summa Theologiae, trans. Gilby, T. and others, 60 vols. London and New York: Blackfriars, Eyre & Spottiswoode, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Travis, C. 1991. ‘Annals of Analysis’, Mind c, 2, 236–64.Google Scholar
Trigg, R. H. 1973. Reason and Commitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trigg, R. H. 1985. Understanding Social Science. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trigg, R. H. 1988a. ‘The Metaphysical Self’, Religious Studies 24, 3, 277–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigg, R. H. 1988b. Ideas of Human Nature. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trigg, R. H. 1989. Reality at Risk: A Defence of Realism in Philosophy and the Sciences, 2nd edn. New York and London: Harvester.Google Scholar
Wainwright, G. 1980. ‘The Understanding of Liturgy in the Light of its History’, in Jones, C., Wainwright, G. and Yarnold, E. (eds), The Study of Liturgy. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Warner, M. M. 1973. ‘Black's Metaphors’, The British Journal of Aesthetics 13, 367372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, M. M. 1985. ‘Philosophy, Language and the Reform of Public Worship’, in Phillips Griffiths, A. (ed.), Philosophy and Practice. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, M. M. 1989a. Philosophical Finesse: Studies in the Art of Rational Persuasion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Warner, M. M. 1989b. ‘On Not Deconstructing the Difference between Literature and Philosophy’, Philosophy and Literature 13, 1, 1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, M. M. 1990a. ‘Philosophy, Implicature and Liturgy’, in Jasper, D. & Jasper, R. C. D. (eds), Language and the Worship of the Church. London:Macmillan.Google Scholar
Warner, M. M. (ed.) 1990b. The Bible as Rhetoric: Studies in Biblical Persuasion and Credibility. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1933. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. C. K. Ogden. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations, trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1958. The Blue and Brown Books, ed. Rhees, R.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1961a. Notebooks: 1914-1916, ed. von Wright, G. H. and Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1961b. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1965. ‘Wittgenstein's Lecture on Ethics’, The Philosophical Review, lxxiv, 1, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1966. Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, ed. D. C. Barrett. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1967. Wittgenstein und der Weiner Kreis, recorded by F. Waismann, ed. McGuiness, B. F.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1969. On Certainty, ed. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright, trans. D. Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1975. Philosophical Remarks, ed. R. Rhees, trans. R. Hargreaves and R. White. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1979. Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle, recorded by F. Waismann, ed. McGuiness, B. F., trans. Schulte, J. and McGuiness, B. F.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1980. Culture and Value, ed. G. H. von Wright, trans. P. Winch. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wood, T. 1986. ‘Euthanasia,’ in Macquarrie, J. and Childress, J. (eds), A New Dictionary of Christian Ethics. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar