Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T08:15:59.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The peasant and the nation plot: a distant reading of the Romanian rural novel from the first half of the twentieth century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2022

Cosmin Borza*
Affiliation:
Sextil Pușcariu Institute of Linguistics and Literary History, Romanian Academy, Cluj-Napoca Branch, Romania
Daiana Gârdan
Affiliation:
Faculty of Letters and Arts, Lucian Blaga University, Sibiu, Romania
Emanuel Modoc
Affiliation:
Sextil Pușcariu Institute of Linguistics and Literary History, Romanian Academy, Cluj-Napoca Branch, Romania
*
*Corresponding author. Email: cosmi_borza@yahoo.com

Abstract

Our article conducts a critical reassessment of one of the most influential cultural myths in Eastern Europe throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: the nationalist definition of peasantry as embodying the quintessence of the nation. In order to evaluate the imagological scope and ideological implications engendered by this so-called ‘people-nation myth’, we focus on the Romanian culture, whom we consider fully representative for the Eastern European context. More exactly, our study employs a distant reading of the Romanian rural novel from the first half of the twentieth century, precisely the literary subgenre supposed to reflect the coalescence between the peasantry and the nation. By analysing the co-occurrences in these novels between words belonging to the vocabularies of nation and rurality, we aim at showing that – contrary to traditional historiographic consensus – nation building has less to do with language or ethnicity, and much more to do with social emancipation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aderca, Felix. 1935. ‘Un tânăr semicentenar [A young semi-centennial man]’, Cuvântul liber, 4: 4.Google Scholar
Alexandrescu, Sorin. 1987. ‘Populisme et bourgeoisie: La Roumanie au début du siècle’, in Catherine Durandie, ed., Populisme d’Europe Centrale et Orientale: Restauration et utopie (Paris), pp. 11–45.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Comunities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism (London and New York, NY).Google Scholar
Baghiu, Ștefan et al. 2020–1. Astra Data Mining: Muzeul Digital al Romanului Românesc: 1900–1932 și 1933–1947 (Sibiu).Google Scholar
Balibar, Etienne and Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1991. Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities, trans. by Etienne Balibar and Chris Turner (London and New York, NY).Google Scholar
Bíró, Béla. 2009. ‘The possibility of narratorial irony in the novel Ion by Liviu Rebreanu’, Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 1: 145–63.Google Scholar
Blaga, Lucian. 1972. ‘Elogiu satului românesc [In Praise of the Romanian Village]’ (1937), in Lucian Blaga, Isvoade [Writings] (Bucharest), pp. 3348.Google Scholar
Block, Sharon. 2006. ‘Doing more with digitization: an introduction to topic modeling of early American sources’, Commonplace: The Interactive Journal of Early American Life, 6:2, accessed 20th February 2022.Google Scholar
Bode, Katherine. 2018. A World of Fiction: Digital Collections and the Future of Literary History (Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
Borza, Cosmin. 2019. ‘How to Populate a Country: A Quantitative Analysis of the Rural Novel in Romania (1900–2000)’, in Baghiu, Ștefan, Pojoga, Vlad and Sass, Maria, eds, Ruralism and Literature in Romania (Berlin), pp. 2140.Google Scholar
Brass, Tom. 2000. Peasants, Populism and Postmodernism: The Return of the Agrarian Myth (New York, NY).Google Scholar
Brockliss, Laurence and Sheldon, Nicola, eds. 2012. Mass Education and the Limits of State Building, c. 1870–1930 (London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Călinescu, G. 1988. History of Romanian Literature, trans. by Levițchi, Leon (Milan).Google Scholar
Case, Holly. 2009. Between States: The Transylvanian Question and the European Idea during World War II (Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
Cavallero, Glen. 1977. The Rural Tradition in the English Novel: 1900–1939 (London and Basingstoke, UK).Google Scholar
Cherven, Ken. 2015. Mastering Gephi Network Visualization (Birmingham).Google Scholar
Chirot, Daniel. 1976. Social Change in a Peripheral Society: The Creation of a Balkan Colony (New York, NY).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornis-Pope, Marcel and Neubauer, John, eds. 2004. History of the Literary Cultures of East-Central Europe: Junctures and Disjunctures in the 19th and 20th Centuries, vol. III (Amsterdam-Philadelphia).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drace-Francis, Alex. 2006. The Making of Modern Romanian Culture: Literacy and the Development of National Identity (London and New York, NY).Google Scholar
Drace-Francis, Alex. 2013. ‘The Traditions of Invention: Representations of the Romanian Peasant from Ancient Stereotype to Modern Symbol’, in The Traditions of Invention: Romanian Ethnic and Social Stereotypes in Historical Context (Leiden and Boston, MA), pp. 1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duczyńska, Ilona. 1963. ‘The Hungarian Populists’, in Duczyńska, Ilona and Polyani, Karl, eds, The Plough and the Pen. Writings from Hungary: 1930–1956 (London), pp. 1732.Google Scholar
Dumitru, Teodora. 2019. ‘Social Class Difference and the Evolution of Romanian Literature from Lovinescu’s Perspective (1924–1929)’, in Baghiu, Ștefan, Pojoga, Vlad and Sass, Maria, eds, Ruralism and Literature in Romania (Berlin), pp. 205–18.Google Scholar
Eellend, Johan. 2008. ‘Agrarianism and Modernization in Inter-war Eastern Europe’, in Wawrzeniuk, Piotr, ed., Societal Change and Ideological Formation among the Rural Population of the Baltic Area 1880–1939 (Huddinge), pp. 3556.Google Scholar
Eve, Martin Paul. 2019. Close-Reading with Computers: Textual Scholarship, Computational Formalism, and David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas (Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
Freitag, Florian. 2013. The Farm Novel in North America: Genre and Nation in the United States, English Canada, and French Canada, 1845–1945 (Rochester, NY).Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism (Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
Heiden, Serge, Magué, Jean-Philippe and Pincemin, Bénédicte. 2010. ‘TXM: une plateforme logicielle open-source pour la textométrie – conception et développement’, in Bolasco, Sergio, Chiari, Isabella, and Giuliano, Luca, eds., Proceedings of 10th International Conference on the Statistical Analysis of Textual Data – JADT 2010 (Rome).Google Scholar
Held, Joseph. 1996. Populism in Eastern Europe: Racism, Nationalism, and Society (Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
Hitchins, Keith. 2014. A Concise History of Romania (Cambridge, UK).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. 1990. Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality (Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
Ibrăileanu, G. 1925. ‘Ce este poporanismul? [What is poporanism?]’, Viața românească, 1: 135–49.Google Scholar
Ionescu, Ghiță and Gellner, Ernest, eds. 1969. Populism: Its Meanings and National Characteristics (London).Google Scholar
Iorga, N. 1979. O luptă literară [A Literary Battle] (Bucharest).Google Scholar
Istrate, Ion et al. 2004. Dicționarul cronologic al romanului românesc de la origini până la 1989 [The Chronological Dictionary of the Romanian Novel from its Origins until 1989] (Bucharest).Google Scholar
Kirilloff, Gabi. 2022. ‘Computation as context: new approaches to the close/distant reading debate’, College Literature: A Journal of Critical Literary Studies, 49:1, 125.Google Scholar
Kligman, Gail and Verdery, Katherine. 2011. Peasants under Siege: The Collectivization of Romanian Agriculture, 1949–1962 (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Koszor Codrea, Cosmin. 2019. ‘Science Popularization and Romanian Anarchism in the Nineteenth Century’, in Baghiu, Ștefan, Pojoga, Vlad and Sass, Maria, eds, Ruralism and Literature in Romania (Berlin), pp. 191204.Google Scholar
Kovács, Gábor. 2019. ‘Burghers, intellectuals, and gentries. The utopia of alternative modernization in the interwar Hungarian populist movement: László Németh, Ferenc Erdei, and István Bibó’, Acta Univ. Sapientiae, Social Analysis, 9: 7184.Google Scholar
Lewiss, Virginia L. 2009. ‘Land, self and nation in Rebreanu’s Ion: commodification and the dismantling of meaning’, The Slavonic and East European Review, 87:2, 259–83.Google Scholar
Livezeanu, Irina. 1995. Cultural Politics in Greater Romania: Regionalism, Nation Building, and Ethnic Struggle, 1918–1930 (Ithaca, NY and London).Google Scholar
Llobera, Josep R. 1994. The God of Modernity: The Development of Nationalism in Western Europe (London and New York, NY).Google Scholar
Maiorescu, Titu. 2010. ‘Against the Contemporary Direction in Romanian Culture’ (1868). trans. by Mária Kovács, in Ahmet Ersoy, Maciej Górny and Vangelis Kechriotis, eds, Modernism: Representations of National Culture: Discourses of Collective Identity in Central and Southeast Europe 1770–1945: Texts and Commentaries, vols III/2 (Budapest), pp. 87–93.Google Scholar
Marin, Irina. 2018. Peasant Violence and Antisemitism in Early Twentieth-Century Eastern Europe (Cham).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, Franco. 2007. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History (New York, NY).Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. 2013. Distant Reading (New York, NY).Google Scholar
Nemoianu, Virgil. 1989. A Theory of the Secondary: Literature, Progress, and Reaction (Baltimore, MD and London).Google Scholar
Parkinson, Michael H. 1984. The Rural Novel: Jeremias Gotthelf, Thomas Hardy, C. F. Ramuz (Bern).Google Scholar
Pârvulescu, Anca and Boatcă, Manuela. 2021. ‘The inter-imperial dowry plot: Modernist Naturalism in the periphery of European Empire’, Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 23:4, 570–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrescu, Cezar. 1933. Apostol (Bucharest).Google Scholar
Petrescu, Cezar. 1937. 1907, vol. I (Bucharest).Google Scholar
Pojoga, Vlad, Neagu, Laurențiu-Marian and Dascălu, Mihai. 2020. ‘The character network in Liviu Rebreanu’s Ion: a quantitative analysis of dialogue’, Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory, 6:2, 2347.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, foreword by Stiglitz, Joseph E., introduction by Fred Block (Boston, MA).Google Scholar
Radu, Sorin and Budeancă, Cosmin, eds. 2016. Countryside and Communism in Eastern Europe: Perceptions, Attitudes, Propaganda (Zürich).Google Scholar
Radu, Sorin and Schmitt, Oliver Jens. 2017. Politics and Peasants in Interwar Romania: Perceptions, Mentalities, Propaganda (Newcastle upon Tyne).Google Scholar
Rebreanu, Liviu. 1932. Răscoala [The Uprising], vol. II (Bucharest).Google Scholar
Rebreanu, Liviu. 1940. ‘Lauda țăranului român [In praise of the Romanian peasant]’, Viața românească, 7: 311.Google Scholar
Rebreanu, Liviu. 1945. Ion le roumain, Traduit de roumain avec une introduction par Pierre Mesnard (Paris).Google Scholar
Rebreanu, Liviu. 1965. Ion, trans. by Hillard, A. (London).Google Scholar
Rostás, Zoltán. 2011. ‘A sociological school from a communicational perspective: the case of Dimitrie Gusti’s monographic school’, Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Social Analysis, 1: 8397.Google Scholar
Simuț, Ion. 2010. Liviu Rebreanu și contradicțiile realismului (Cluj-Napoca).Google Scholar
Stahl, Henriette Yvonne. 1924. Voica (Bucharest).Google Scholar
Terian, Andrei. 2009. G. Călinescu. A cincea esență [G. Călinescu. The Fifth Essence] (Bucharest).Google Scholar
Tudurachi, Adrian. 2018. ‘Réprimer le multilinguisme: la naissance d’un grand écrivain national dans les ruines de l’Empire’, Neohelicon, 45:1, 265–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernois, Paul. 1966. Le roman rustique de George Sand à Ramuz: Ses tendances et son evolution: 1860–1925 (Paris).Google Scholar
Wächter, Magda. 2020. ‘The Romanian interwar novel: definitional attempts and controversies’, Dacoromania litteraria, 7: 182–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wawrzeniuk, Piotr, ed. 2008. Societal Change and Ideological Formation Among the Rural Population of the Baltic Area 1880–1939 (Huddinge).Google Scholar
Weber, Eugen. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France (1870–1914) (Stanford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1973. The Country and the City (Oxford, UK).Google Scholar