Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T11:22:51.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pottery Production and Proto-Industrialisation: Continuity and Change in the Rural Ceramics Industries of the Saintonge Region, France, 1250 to 1800

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2008

Elizabeth Musgrave
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Upper Saintonge region of western France was one of the primary production centres for the supply of exotic pottery to Britain and northern Europe between the thirteenth and the eighteenth centuries. The principal manufacturing sites were rural workshops in the parishes neighbouring La Chapelle-des-Pots, on the wooded, limestone plateau north east of Saintes and some fifty kilometres down the river Charente from the maritime port of La Rochelle. The expansion of rural industries, producing for extra-regional markets, was a Europe-wide phenomenon between the sixteenth and nineteenth centuries. The theory of proto-industrialisation has been used to explain this process. It has been argued that regionally-dense, rural industries grew up as urban merchants sought cheap production methods to profit from growing overseas demand for manufactured goods, especially textiles and metals. By the later eighteenth or nineteenth centuries, the participation of large numbers of country people in industrial work altered traditional regional demographic and agrarian regimes, resulting in population growth, land-holding fragmentation and the creation of mercantile profit. This provided labour, finance and motive for a ‘second phase’ in the transition from feudal to capitalist economic relations in some regions of Europe and fully-developed industrialisation in others.

Type
Research Article
Information
Rural History , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 1998 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. See Renimel, Serge, L'artisanat céramique de Saintonge du XIIIeme siècle à nos jours – essai de reconnaisance documentaire et archéologique d'un espace rural, thèse du troisième cycle (Université de Paris I, 1978)Google Scholar also Hurst, John G., Neal, David S. and van Beuningen, H. J. E., Pottery Produced and Traded in North West Europe 1350–1650, Rotterdam Papers VI (Rotterdam, 1986), p. 76.Google Scholar

2. Vardi, L., The Land and the Loom: Peasants and Profits in Northern France 1680–1800 (Durham N.C., 1993), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar

3. For a useful summary of the proto-industrialisation theories of Mendels, Kriedte, Medick, Schlumbohm and others see Ogilvie, S. C. and Cerman, M., European Proto-industrialisation (Cambridge, 1996), chapter 1.Google Scholar

4. Clarkson, L. A., Proto-industrialization: The First Phase of Industrialization? Studies in Economic and Social History, (Basingstoke, 1985), p. 52.Google Scholar

5. Deyon, P., ‘Proto-industrialization in France’, in Ogilvie and Cerman, European Proto-industrialization, p. 41.Google Scholar

6. Tarlé, E., L'industrie dans les campagnes en France à la fin de l'ancien régime (Paris, 1910), p. 79.Google Scholar

7. Mendels saw the origins of large-scale rural industries – proto-industries – in the search for complementary incomes to agriculture (Ogilvie, and Cerman, , European Proto-industrialization, p. 26).Google Scholar

8. Renimel, , L'artisanat, p. 43.Google Scholar

9. Julien-Labruyère, F., Paysans charentais: histoire des campagnes d'Aunis, Saintonge et Bas Angoulême (La Rochelle, 1982), 1, 32–33.Google Scholar

10. Chapelot, Jean, Artisans potiers en Saintonge du moyen age an XlXeme siècle – techniques et production (typescript, n.d.), pp. 1–2Google Scholar according to Julien-Labruyère the Church was responsible for c. 25 per cent of medieval clearances in the Saintonge, Paysans charentais, 1, 129.Google Scholar

11. See Zell, M., Industry in the Countryside: Wealden Society in the Sixteenth Century (Cambridge, 1994), p. 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. See Stopford, J., The Changing Structure of a Small Medieval Industry: An Approach to the Study of Floor Tiles (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Reading, 1990).Google Scholar

13. Chapelot, Jean, ‘La société rurale saintongeaise et l'économie du marché aux XVeme – XVIeme siècles: la seigneurie de Taillebourg et ses environs’, Revue de Saintonge et d'Aunis, X (1984), 94.Google Scholar

14. Julien-Labruyere, , Paysans charentais, 1, 350.Google Scholar

15. Archives Départementales de la Charente Maritime (hereafter A.D.C.M.) 20 J 1840.

16. Chapelot, , ‘La société rurale’, 90.Google Scholar

17. Ibid., 99.

18. Ibid., 94, 97.

19. Ibid., 101.

20. Astill, G. and Davies, W., The East Brittany Survey (London, forthcoming);Google ScholarChapelot, , ‘La société rurale’, 103.Google Scholar

21. Ogilvie, and Cerman, , European Proto-industrialization, p. 3.Google Scholar

22. Chapelot, Jean, ‘Le droit d'accès à l'argile et à la pierre des tuiliers-chauniers d'Ecoyeux (Charente-Maritime) aux XVeme – XVIeme siècles: l'apport des sources judicaires’, in Benoît, P. et Braunstein, P., Mines, carrières et metallurgie dans la France médiévale, Actes du colloque de Paris19–21 juin 1980, C.N.R.S. (Paris, 1983), pp. 147–151.Google Scholar There was rapid inflation of primary commodity prices, particularly food – the cost of grain and wine at La Rochelle, the nearest available series, rose ten and seven times respectively 1470–1600 – and the real value of agricultural wages declined, by 15 per cent of their 1495 value by 1595 (Ladurie, E. Leroy, The French Peasantry 1450–1660 (Aldershot, 1987), pp. 72, 352).Google Scholar

23. Dewald draws similar conclusions for the lordship of Pont-Saint-Pierre in Normandy, Dewald, J., Pont-Saint-Pierre 1398–1789: Lordship, Community and Capitalism in Early Modern France (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1987), pp. 281–282.Google Scholar

24. Chapelot, , ‘Le droit d'accés’, p. 138.Google Scholar

25. Ibid., p. 138.

26. Chapelot, , ‘La societe rurale’, p. 102.Google Scholar

27. Hare, J.N., ‘The Lords and their Tenants: Conflict and Stability in Fifteenth-Century Wiltshire’, in B. Stapleton (ed.), Conflict and Community in Southern England (Stroud, 1992), p. 19Google Scholar.

28. Chapelot, , ‘Le droit d'accés’ p. 145.Google Scholar

29. Ibid., p. 146.

30. Renimel, , L'artisanat, p. 237.Google Scholar

31. Chapelot, , Artisans potiers, pp 1–5.Google Scholar

32. Jones, P., ‘The Peasantry of France on the Eve of the French Revolution’, History of European Ideas, 12, 3 (1990), 348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar As Mendels points out, rural populations found supplementary resources to their family incomes in industrial work (Mendels, F., ‘Des industries rurales à la proto-industnalisation: histonque d'un changement de perspective’, Annales Economie Société Civilisation, 39 (1984), 988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. Mager, W., ‘Proto-Industrialization and Proto-Industry: The Uses and Drawbacks of Two Concepts’, Continuity and Change, 8, 2 (1993), 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34. Dewald, , Pont-Saint-Pierre, p. 193.Google Scholar

35. Ibid., p. 248.

36. Kriedte, P., Medick, H. and Schlumbohm, J., ‘Proto-Industrialization Revisited: Demography, Social Structure and Modern Domestic Industry’, Continuity and Change, 8, 2 (1993), 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37. Schlumbohm, J., ‘Proto-Industrialization as a Research Strategy and a Historical Period – A Balance Sheet’, in Ogilvie, S. C. and German, M., European Proto-Industrialization, p. 14.Google Scholar

38. Ibid., p. 14.

39. Chapelot, , ‘Le droit d'accès’ p. 122.Google Scholar

40. A.D.C.M. E 969.

41. A.D.C.M. Parish Registers, La Chapelle-des-Pots.

42. A.D.C.M. 3 E LVIII/193.

43. A.D.C.M. Parish registers, La Chapelle-des-Pots.

44. In much of early modern Europe there was a clear and often strict gendered division of labour within household enterprises. Pfister shows that in Swiss proto-industrial households, different family members could carry out different forms of wage work as individuals. Schlumbohm, , ‘Proto-Industrialization’, p. 14.Google Scholar

45. A.D.C.M. 3 E LVIII/193. More details on the gendered division of labour can be found in Musgrave, E., ‘Family, Household and Production: The Potters of the Saintonge, France, 1500 to 1800’, in Cumberpatch, C.G. and Blinkhorn, P.W. (eds.), Not So Much A Pot As A Way Of Life (Oxford, 1997), pp. 85–94.Google Scholar

46. A.D.C.M. 3 E LVIII/193.

47. See Zell, , Industry, 95;Google Scholar for similar comments on the Aveyron region see Jones, P.M., Politics and Rural Society: the Southern Massif Centrale c. 1750–1880 (Cambridge, 1985), p. 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48. Chapelot, , ‘La société rurale’, 128.Google Scholar

49. A.D.C.M. 3 E LVIII/193.

50. A.D.C.M. 3 E LVIII/157.

51. Hanusse, C., ‘La relation four-atelier d'après les sources écrits: l'exemple de Sadirac (Gironde) du XVIe au XVIIIe sèicle’, in Chapelot, J., Galinié, H. and Pilet-Lenière, J. (ed.), La céramique (Ve – XIXe siècles): Fabrication, commercialisation, utilisation (Caen, 1987), p. 105.Google Scholar

52. Chapelot, , ‘Le droit d'accès’, p. 134.Google Scholar

53. Ibid., pp. 145, 134.

54. A.D.C.M. B 2967.

55. A.D.C.M. E 783.

56. A.D.C.M. 3 E LVIII/194.

57. Allen, J., ‘Some Post-Medieval Documentary Evidence for the Trade in Ceramics’, in Davey, P. and Hodges, R. (eds.), Ceramics and Trade (Sheffield, 1983), p. 42.Google Scholar

58. B.M. La Rochelle 1824 Notaire Morineau 30 May 1633.

59. Some of the implications of this data have been discussed in Musgrave, ‘Family, Household and Production’.

60. Rowlands, 1989, p. 109.

61. Sonenscher, M., Work and Wages: Natural Law, Politics and the Eighteenth-Century Trades in France (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 22–27, 31–34, 131–151.Google Scholar

62. Cerutti, S., ‘Group Strategies and Trade Strategies: The Turin Tailors’ Guild in the Late Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth Centuries’, in Woolf, S. (ed.), Domestic Strategies: Work and Family in France and Italy 1600–1800 (Cambridge, 1991), p. 119.Google Scholar

63. A.D.C.M. Parish registers, La Chapelle-des-Pots.

64. A.D.C.M. Parish registers, La Chapelle-des-Pots.

65. Renimel, , L'artisanat, p. 323.Google Scholar

66. Archives Municipales de Nantes HH 165.

67. Cohen, M., ‘Peasant Differentiation and Proto-industrialization in the Ulster countryside: Tullylish 1690–1825’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 17 (1989–1990), 419.Google Scholar

68. Berg, M., ‘Small Producer Capitalism in Eighteenth-Century England’, Business History, 35, 1 (1993), 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

69. Ibid., p. 19.

70. Vardi, , Land and the Loom, p. 229.Google Scholar

71. David, P. and Gabet, C., La ceramique saintongeaise dti XIIIe an XVIIIe siècle, Société de Géographic de Rochefort, (Rochefort, 1988), p. 5;Google Scholar B.M. La Rochelle 1824 Notaire Morineau 30 May 1633.

72. Berg, , ‘Small Producer Capitalism’, p. 25.Google Scholar

73. Ibid., p. 36.

74. From 25.5 to 19 for men and from 21.6 to 24.4 for women. Julien-Labruyére, , Paysans charentais, II, 218Google Scholar.

75. David, and Gabet, , La ceramique saintongeaise, p. 5.Google Scholar

76. Jones, , Politics and Rural Society, p. 57.Google Scholar

77. Ibid., p. 56.

78. Ibid., p. 57.