Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T07:08:28.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politices of Production: Technology, Markets, and the Two Cultures of American Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Philip Scranton
Philip Scranton
Affiliation:
Department of HistoryRutgers University, Camden and Center for the History of Business, Technology, and Society Hagley Museum and Library
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As the American economy became more complex and differentiated in the post-1850 decades, so too did the demand for manufactured products, creating wide markets for both mass-produced standard goods and batch-produced specialties among consumers and producers alike. These developments conditioned the emergence of distinctive work cultures within the two broad spheres of manufacturing, as well as distinct approaches to technological selection and use, labor, marketing, and management. As the mass production dynamic has been well documented, this essay focuses principally on elaborating the practices of industrial specialists for comparison with those of “managerial capitalism.” Conditions and controversies in the textile, woodworking, and metalworking trades provide an in-depth example of larger patterns among batch-oriented sectors in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, including issues of the politics (i.e., power relations) in production and the recording of masculine identity and values. The role of public policies in facilitating the universalization of mass production rhetorics and practices is considered at the close.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , Summer 1995 , pp. 369 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, H. B. 1911. “Manufacturing Broom and Other Handles.” The wood-Worker, May, 34–35.Google Scholar
“Apprenticeship at Baldwin Locomotive”. 1901–1902. Machinery 8: 56.Google Scholar
“Apprenticeship System of the Brown and Sharle Mfg. Col.” 1902–1903. Machinery 9: 327–28.Google Scholar
“A Word about Apprenticeship.” 1898–1899. Machinery 5: 90.Google Scholar
Bengeman, Myron. 1942. Manufacturing Processes. New York: John Wiley and Co.Google Scholar
Benson, Susan. 1986. Counter Cultures, Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Berne, M. C. 1910. “Handling Furniture-Factory Employees.” The Wood-Worker, September, 40–41.Google Scholar
Berne, M. C. 1910b. “The Auditor's Report: Or, A Cut in Wages.” The Wood-Worker, December, 39–41.Google Scholar
Block, Fred. 1987. Revising State Theory. Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple Unversity press.Google Scholar
Calvert, Monte. 1967. The mechnical Engineer in America: 1830–1910. Baltimore, The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Casey, Daniel. 1907. “The Trade School — A Factory Annex.” System 12: 294–60.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred. 1977. The Visible Hand. Cambridge, Mass.: Harverd University Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred. [1959] 1986. “The Beginning of ‘Big Business’ in American Industry.” In Managing Big Business, edited by Tedlow, R. and John, R.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cheape, Charles. 1986. Family Firm to Modern Multinational. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. 1987. Gender and Power. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, W. L. n.d. “The Management of Men.” The wood-Worker, January, 32–33.Google Scholar
C. W. C. 1904–1905. “The Man Who Is the Whole Thing.” Machinery 11: 100–101.Google Scholar
Deinzer, Alexander. 1911. “Organization, Administration, Management.” The Wood-Worker, September, 32–33Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1983. Explaining Technical Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Entropy, [pseud.]. 1905–1906. “Heroic Methods of Doing Work.” Machinery 12: 199–200Google Scholar
Fales, Martha. 1987. “F.A. Moreland's Practical Decortive Upholstery.” In Upholstery in America and Europe, edited by Cooke, Edward Jr. New York.Google Scholar
Farnam, Anne. 1987. “The A. H. Davenport Company of Boston.” In Upholtery in America and Europe, edited by Cooke, Edward Jr.Google Scholar
Fassl, Carl. 1989. “The History of the Philadelphia of Textiles and Science.” Unpublished ms., Arichives, Philadelphia College of Textiles and Sciences.Google Scholar
Forty, Adrian. 1986. Objects of Desire. New York: Thames and HudsonGoogle Scholar
Frevert, H. F. 1905–1906. “How Machine Tools Are Sold.” Machinery. 12: 243–45.Google Scholar
“From Small Beginnings.” 1896–1897. Machinery. 2: 189.Google Scholar
Gerth, H. H., and Wright mills, C.. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
“The Great West Allis Plant of the Allis-Chalmers Company.” 1902–1903, Machinery. 9:258–89.Google Scholar
Grier, Katherine. 1988. Culture and Comfort: People, Parlors and Upholstery, 1850–1930. Rochester, N.Y..: The Strong Museum.Google Scholar
Gross, Lawrence. 1993. The Boott Mills, 1986–1950. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hardcase, A. [pseud.]. 1897–1998. “A Few Notes from Washington, with Comments on the Methods of Uncle Sam.” Machinery 4: 16–17.Google Scholar
Hareven, Tamara, and Ralph, Langenbach. 1987. Amoskeag New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Harris, Howell. 1989. “The Master Craftsman.” Labor History 30 (Winter): 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Howell. 1991. “Getting It Together: The Metal Manufactures' Association of Philadelphia.” In Managing the Workplace, edited by Jacob, Sanford. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hounshell, David. 1984. From the American System to Mass Production, 1800–1932. Baltimore. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Sanford. 1989. “The Workplace as an Expressive Totality”. Labor History 30 (winter): 106–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Jones engineering Company.” 1899–1900. Machinery. 6:7, 42–43, 73–74, 149, 171.Google Scholar
Landsburgh, Richard. 1923. Industrial Management. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Leverenz, David. 1989. Manhood an the American Renaissance. Ithaca, N.Y.: Corenll University Press.Google Scholar
Liebe, Charles. 1910. “Tales of a Veteran, No. 3.” The Wood-Worker, July, 27–28.Google Scholar
Mack, Wilfred. 1912. “Increasing the Efficiency of Men.” The Wood-Worker, May, 23–24.Google Scholar
Marchand, Roland, 1985. Advertising the American Dream. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mass, William. 1985. “Technological Choice and Industrial Relations.” Ph.D diss. Boston college. Boston.Google Scholar
Meikle, Jeffrey, 1979. Twentieth Century Limited. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Stephen. 1981. The Five-Dollar Day. Albany, N.Y.:SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, stephen. 1988. “Technology and the Workplace: Skilled and Production Workers at Allis-Chalmers, 1900–1941.” Technology and Culture 29 (October): 838–64.Google Scholar
Milkman, Ruth, ed. 1985. Women, WOrk, and Protest. Boston: Routledge.Google Scholar
Milkman, Ruth. 1987. Gender at Work Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Mills, James. 1907. “New Match-Making Machinery.” The Wood-Worker, December, 45.Google Scholar
Milo, [pseud.]. 1987–1998. “No Admittance vs. Visitors Welcome.” Machinery 4: 189.Google Scholar
Montgomery, David. 1979. Workers' Control in America. New York. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neale, A. D. 1970. The Anti-Trust Laws of the U.S.A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Daniel. 1975 Workers and Managers. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Linda. 1986. Gender and History: The Limits of History in the Age of the Family. New York. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, David. 1977 America by Design. New York Knopf.Google Scholar
“Notes Taken at the Works of the Newport News Shipbuilding and Drydock company.” 1900–1901. Machinery 7:201–6.Google Scholar
Pahl, R. E. 1988. On Work: Historical, Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Partridge, W. E. 1892. “Does Capital Need High Priced Labor?” Engineering magazine 3:651.Google Scholar
Pentz, Albert. 1892. “Machine Shop Notes.” Engineering Magazine 3:588–90.Google Scholar
“The Piecework System.” 1707. The Wood-Worker. September.Google Scholar
Piore, Michael, and Charles, Sabel. 1984 The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Podunk, Ichabod [pseud]. 1897–1898. “Notes from Notown-20.” Machinery 4:151–52.Google Scholar
Foor, Filer [pseud]. 1907. The Wood-Worker, November, 30.Google Scholar
Prentice, A. 1907. “What the Man Wants.” The Wood-Worker, July, 36.Google Scholar
Pulos, Arthur. 1983. American Design Ethic: A History of Industrial Design to 1940. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, Frank Jr 1905 “Sparks from the Old Man's Wire.” System 8: 578–89.Google Scholar
Richards, Frank. 1894. “The Young Mechanic.” Engineering Magazine 7:444–48.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. S. 1896–1897. “Labor's Value.” Machinery 2:224–25.Google Scholar
Rolph, William. 1912. “Successful Management and Its Reward.” The Wood-Worker, January, 34–35.Google Scholar
Rorabaugh, W. J. 1986. The Craft Apprentice from Franklin to the Machine Age in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salvatore, Nick, 1982. Eugene Debs. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan. 1988. Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scranton, Philip. 1983. Proprietary Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scranton, Philip. 1989. Figured Tapestry: Production, Markets, and Power in Philadelphia Textiles, 1885–1940. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scranton, Philip. Forthcoming. Diversity and Display: The Course of the Philadelphia Upholstery Trades. 1880–1940. Rochester, N.Y.: Strong Museum.Google Scholar
Scranton, Philip, and Walter, Licht. 1986. Work Sights: Industrial Philadelphia, 1890–1950. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
“The Shops of the Belthlehem Steel COmpany.” 1899–1900. Machinery 6:33–38, 65–70.Google Scholar
Sklar, Martin. 1988. The Corporate Reconstruction of American Capitalism, 1890–1916. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Oberlin. 1894–1895. “Modern Machine Tools.” Engineering Magazine 8:58.Google Scholar
“Social Features of the Weston Electrical Instrument Co.'s Shops.” 1905–1906. Machinery 12:196–97.Google Scholar
Spriegel, William, and Richard, Landsburgh. 1947. Industrial Management, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Stearns, Peter. 1979. Be A Man! Males in Modern Society. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
Taussig, F. W., 1931. The Tariff History of the United States, 8th ed. New York:Putnam.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. C. 1907. “What the Man Wants.” The Wood-Worker, September, 43.Google Scholar
“Tendencies in Mill Work.” 1907. The Wood-Worker, September, 19.Google Scholar
Tiffany, Paul. 1988. The Decline of American Steel. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tiffany, Paul 1988. The Decline of American steel New York:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. 1985. The State and the Unions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traveler, [pseud.]. 1907. “Labor Troubles.” The Wood-Worker, July, 22–23.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1914. The Instinct of Workmanship. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Washburn, Charles. 1917. Industrial Worcester. Worcester, Mass. n.p.Google Scholar
W. H. V. 1909. “A Superintendent and His Troubles.” The Wood-Worker, October, 34–35.Google Scholar
Wise, Con. 1905–1906. “Choosing an Employer.” Machinery 12:576.Google Scholar
Wright, Carroll. 1904. Regulation and Restriction of Output: Eleventh Special Report of the Commissioner of Labor. Washington, D.C.:USGPO.Google Scholar
Young, T. A. 1907 “Nat Simpson's Sessions — No. 4.” The Wood-Worker, June 42–43.Google Scholar