Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T05:21:43.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Strength of Weak Empathy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2012

Stephen Turner
Stephen Turner*
Affiliation:
University of South Florida E-mail: turner@usf.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

This paper builds on a neglected philosophical idea, Evidenz. Max Weber used it in his discussion of Verstehen, as the goal of understanding either action or such things as logic. It was formulated differently by Franz Brentano, but with a novel twist: that anyone who understood something would see the thing to be understood as self-evident, not something dependent on inference, argument, or reasoning. The only way one could take something as evident in this sense is by being able to treat other people as having the same responses – by empathy with them, in the weak sense of following their thought. Brentano's philosophical claim is that without some stopping point at what is self-evident, justifications fall into infinite regress. This is radically opposed to much of conventional philosophy. The usual solutions to the regress problem rely on problematic claims about the supposed hidden transcendental structure behind reasoning. In contrast, empathy is a genuine natural phenomenon and a better explanation for the actual phenomenon of making sense of the reasoning of others. What is evident to all who are capable of understanding is an empirically-defined subset of this class.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 25 , Issue 3: The Varieties of Empathy in Science, Art, and History , September 2012 , pp. 383 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaker, Jennifer and Williams, Patti. 1998. “Empathy versus Pride: The Influence of Emotional Appeals across Cultures.” Journal of Consumer Research 25:241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 1979. “Freedom and Constraint by Norms.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16:187–96.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, & Discursive Commitment. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz. [1915] 1966a. “On the Thesis: ‘Veritas Est Adequatio Rei et Intellectus’.” In The True and the Evident. Edited by Kraus, Oskar; translated by Roderick Chisholm, M., Politzer, Ilse, and Fischer, Kurt R., 120–22. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz. [1915] 1966b. “The Evident.” In The True and the Evident. Edited by Kraus, Oskar; translated by Roderick Chisholm, M., Politzer, Ilse, and Fischer, Kurt R., 126–29. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz. [1915] 1966c. “On the Evident.” In The True and the Evident. Edited by Kraus, Oskar; translated by Chisholm, Roderick M., Politzer, Ilse, and Fischer, Kurt R., 130–32. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz. [1889] 2009. The Origin of Our Knowledge of Right and Wrong, edited by Kraus, Oskar. English edition, edited by Chisholm, Roderick M.; translated by Chisholm, Roderick and Schneewind, Elizabeth H.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. [1893] 1964. The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System. Translated and edited by Furth, Montgomery. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladkova, Anna. 2010. “Sympathy, Compassion, and Empathy in English and Russian: A Linguistic and Cultural Analysis.” Culture Psychology 16 (2):267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. [1931] 1962. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by Gibson, W. R. Boyce. London: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Kraus, Oskar. [1930] 1966. “Introduction.” In The True and the Evident. Edited by Kraus, Oskar; translated by Chisholm, Roderick M., Politzer, Ilse, and Fischer, Kurt R., xi-xxix. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kusch, Martin. 1995. Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kusch, Martin. 2007. Psychologism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/psychologism/ (last accessed February 24, 2011).Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schlick, Moritz. [1910] 1979. “The Nature of Truth in Modern Logic.” In Moritz Schlick Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1 (1909–1922). Translated by Heath, Peter, Mulder, H. L., and Van De Velde-Schlick, B. F. B., 41–103. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Shimizu, Hidetada. 2000. “Japanese Cultural Psychology and Empathic Understanding: Implications for Academic and Cultural Psychology.” Ethos 28 (2):224–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. [1922] 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, 3 vols. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. [1911] 2000. “On Legal Theory and Sociology.” In Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis, edited by Jacobson, Arthur J. and Schlink, Bernhard, 50–54. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wegner, Daniel. 2002. The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Peter. [1958] 1990. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy (with a new Introduction). Atlantic Highlands NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. [1921] 1961. Tractatus Logico Philosophicus. Translated by Pears, David F. and Mcguinness, Brian F.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. [1953] 2009. The Philosophical Investigations, revised 4th edn. Translated by Anscombe, Gertrude E.M., Hacker, Peter M. S., and Schulte, Joachim. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969. On Certainty. Edited by Anscombe, Gertrude E.M. and von Wright, Georg Henrik; translated by Paul, Denis and Anscombe, Gertrude E.M.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar