^{page 309 note 2} Harned, D. B., Creed and Personal Identity (Edinburgh, 1981), p. 120.Google Scholar

^{page 309 note 3} Ibid., p. 7 and passim.

^{page 310 note 4} Ibid., pp. 21f.

^{page 310 note 5} Ibid., p. 21.

^{page 311 note 6} Tinsley, E. J., ‘Some Principles for Reconstructing a Doctrine of the Imitation of Christ’, SJT 25 (1972), p. 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 311 note 7} Dodd, C. H., Gospel and Law (Cambridge, 1951), p. 65Google Scholar. I am grateful to K. Vanhoozer for allowing me to see his unpublished paper ‘Between Historical and Literary Criticism: An Assessment of C. H. Dodd 1884–1984’; much of what I say of Dodd is indebted to his interpretation.

^{page 312 note 8} So G. Kind, TWNT I, p. 216.

^{page 312 note 9} Best, E., Following Jesus (Sheffield, 1984), p. 248Google Scholar. Schweizer, Compare E., Lordship and Discipleship (ET London, 1960), p. 11.Google Scholar

^{page 312 note 10} Thurneysen, E., The Sermon on the Mount (ET London, 1965), p. 71.Google Scholar

^{page 312 note 11} Luther's Works, vol. 27 (St Louis, 1964), p. 263Google Scholar. See Wolf's, E. classic essay ‘Die Christusverkündigung bei Luther’ in Peregrinatio (Munich, 1962 ²) pp. 30–80Google Scholar, and Jüngel, E., Zur Freiheit eines Christenmenschen (Munich, 1978).Google Scholar

^{page 313 note 12} Keck, L. E., ‘Justification of the Ungodly and Ethics’ in Friedrich, J., Pöhlmann, W., Stuhlmacher, P., ed., Rechtfertigung. Festschrift für E. Käsemann (Tübingen, 1976), p. 199.Google Scholar

^{page 313 note 13} Ibid., p. 206.

^{page 313 note 14} Jüngel, E., ‘Die Welt als Möglichkeit und Wirklichkeit’ in Unterwegs zur Sache (Munich, 1972), p. 210Google Scholar. Further see Webster, J. B., Eberhard Jüngel (Cambridge, 1986), pp. 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁵ ‘Die Welt als Möglichkeit und Wirklichkeit’, p. 211.

^{page 313 note 16} Jüngel, E., ‘Erwägungen zur Grundlegung evangelischer Ethik’ in Unterwegs zur Sache p. 237.Google Scholar

^{page 313 note 17} Kreck, W., Grundfragen christlicher Ethik (Munich, 1975), p. 127.Google Scholar

^{page 314 note 18} Cf. Thielicke, H., Theological Ethics I (ET London, 1968), p. 96.Google Scholar

^{page 314 note 19} The justice of this interpretation of Abelard is called into question by Weingart, R. E. in The Logic of Divine Love (Oxford, 1970)Google Scholar. See also McGrath, A. E., ‘The Moral Theory of the Atonement’, SJT 38 (1985), pp. 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 314 note 20} Beardslee, W. A., Human Achievement and Divine Vocation in the Message of Paul (London, 1961), p. 131Google Scholar. This study is particularly significant for the questions which it implicitly poses to a theology of grace.

^{page 315 note 21} MacKinnon, D. M., ‘Absolute and Relative in History’ in Explorations in Theology 5 (London, 1979), p. 66.Google Scholar

^{page 315 note 22} See, e.g., Moule's, C. F. D. reply to Knox, J. in ‘Obligation in the Ethic of Paul’ in Essays in New Testament Interpretation (Cambridge, 1982), pp. 261–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar, or Barrett, C. K., Freedom and Obligation (London, 1985), pp. 53–90.Google Scholar

^{page 316 note 23} As in Hooker's, M. D. critique of Sanders, E. P. in her essay on ‘Paul and “Covenantal Nomism”’ in Hooker, M. D., Wilson, S. G., ed., Paul and Paulinism. Essays in Honour of C. K. Barrett (London, 1982), pp. 47–56.Google Scholar

^{page 316 note 24} Dodd, op. cit., p. 67.

^{page 316 note 25} Ibid.

^{page 316 note 26} Berkouwer, G. C., Faith and Sanctification (ET Grand Rapids, 1952), p. 104.Google Scholar

^{page 317 note 27} The lack of an adequate account of human continuity in some Protestant discussions of sanctification is noted in Outka, G., Agape. An Ethical Analysis (London, 1972), pp. 233–255Google Scholar, and Hauerwas, S., Character and the Christian Life (San Antonio, 1975).Google Scholar

^{page 317 note 28} Weber, O., Foundations of Dogmatics I (ET Grand Rapids, 1983), p. 322.Google Scholar

^{page 317 note 29} Ibid.

^{page 317 note 30} Dodd, op. cit., p. 71.

^{page 318 note 31} Käsemann, E., ‘Kritische Analyse von Philippians 2.5.11’ in Exegetische Versuche und Besinnungen I (Göttingen, 1960 ¹), pp. 51–95Google Scholar. Käsemann's case is amplified and defended in Martin, R. P., Carmen Christi (Grand Rapids, 1983 ²)Google Scholar, and finds expression in his Philippians (London, 1980²), ad loc.

^{page 318 note 32} ‘Kritische Analyse’, p. 91.

^{page 318 note 33} Ibid., p. 90.

^{page 318 note 34} Ibid., p. 91.

^{page 318 note 35} Ibid., p. 94.

^{page 318 note 36} Hooker, M. D., ‘Philippians 2.6–11’ in Ellis, E. E., Grässer, E., ed., Jesus und Paulus. Festschrift für W. G. Kümmel (Göttingen, 1975), p. 156.Google Scholar

^{page 318 note 37} ‘Kritische Analyse’, p. 94.

^{page 319 note 38} Ibid., p. 95.

^{page 319 note 39} Hooker, M. D., ‘Interchange and Suffering’ in Horbury, W., McNeil, B., ed., Suffering and Martyrdom in the New Testament (Cambridge, 1981), p. 71.Google Scholar

^{page 319 note 40} Ibid., p. 82.

^{page 319 note 41} Betz, H. D., Nachfolge und Nachahmung Jesu Christi im Neuen Testament (Tübingen, 1967), p. 167Google Scholar. For Betz this constitutes the presence of the ‘unmythical, ungnostic, historical’, what he calls the ‘“ethicising” of the myth’ (Ibid.).

^{page 319 note 42} E.g. Moule, C. F. D., ‘Further Reflexions on Philippians 2.5–11’ in Gasque, W. W., Martin, R. P., ed., Apostolic History and the Gospel (Exeter, 1970), pp. 264–276Google Scholar; Hooker, M. D., ‘Philippians 2.6–11’, p. 154Google Scholar; Collange, J.-F., The Epistle of Saint Paul to the Philippians (ET London, 1979), p. 106.Google Scholar

^{page 319 note 43} Hooker, , ‘Philippians 2.5–11’, p. 154.Google Scholar

^{page 319 note 44} Ibid. In view of Käsemann's evident interest in the critical function of the narrative of Jesus as a counter to docetic absolutising of the church's self-understanding, his account of Philippians 2 is puzzling. See his essays ‘The Problem of the Historical Jesus’ in Essays on New Testament Themes (ET London, 1964), p. 46Google Scholar; ‘Blind Alleys in the “Jesus of History” Controversy’ in New Testament Questions of Today (ET London, 1969), p. 63.Google Scholar

^{page 321 note 45} See Gäumann, N., Taufe und Ethik. Studien zu Röm 6 (Munich, 1967).Google Scholar

^{page 321 note 46} Schnackenburg, R., The Moral Teaching of the New Testament (ET London, 1965), p. 270.Google Scholar

^{page 322 note 47} Ogletree, T. W., The Use of the Bible in Christian Ethics (Oxford, 1984), p. 151Google Scholar. Cf. Tannehill, R., Dying and Rising with Christ (Berlin, 1967).Google Scholar

^{page 322 note 48} Williams, R., The Truce of God (London, 1983), p. 64.Google Scholar

^{page 322 note 49} Williams, R., The Wound of Knowledge (London, 1979), p. 5.Google Scholar

^{page 323 note 50} See Barth, K., CD IV/4 (ET Edinburgh, 1969), p. 42Google Scholar; The Christian Life (ET Edinburgh, 1981), pp. 170–5. The best exposition of Barth here is by Jüngel, E. in Barth-Studien (Gütersloh, 1982).Google Scholar

^{page 324 note 51} Barth, , The Christian Life, p. 51.Google Scholar

^{page 324 note 52} Jüngel, E., ‘Karl Barths Lehre von der Taufe’ in Barth-Studien, p. 273.Google Scholar

^{page 324 note 53} Ibid., pp. 273f., n. 74.

^{page 325 note 54} Besides the work of Harned, see Selby, P., Look for the Living (London, 1976)Google Scholar, and more theoretically Thiselton, A. C., ‘Knowledge, Myth and Corporate Memory’ in Believing in the Church (London, 1981), pp. 45–78Google Scholar. See also Sykes, S. W., ‘The Incarnation as the Foundation of the Church’ in Goulder, M. D., ed., Incarnation and Myth (London, 1979), pp. 115–127.Google Scholar

^{page 325 note 55} Gustafson, J., Christ and the Moral Life (Chicago, 1968), p. 187Google Scholar. The narrative dimensions of ethics are developed particularly by Hauerwas, S. in Truthfulness and Tragedy (None Dame, 1977), pp. 15–39, 71–81Google Scholar; Vision and Virtue (Notre Dame, 1981), pp. 68–89; The Peaceable Kingdom (London, 1984), pp. 17–49.

^{page 325 note 56} Dodd, op. cit., p. 77.

^{page 326 note 57} Ibid., pp. 41f.

^{page 326 note 58} Barth, , The Christian Life, p. 15.Google Scholar

^{page 326 note 59} A. C. Thiselton, op. cit., p. 65.