No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Papacy and Scripture
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
Extract
The subject ‘Papacy and Scripture‘ is of great importance today for two main reasons:
1. Reformed Theology itself requires that we must not be satisfied with the theological standpoint reached at the time of the Reformation but should submit ourselves to continual questioning by the Truth, and so move on to a position more in accordance with the dictates of the self-same Truth which is Jesus Christ. The very fact that we are ‘Reformed’ theologians itself raises the question of whether the anti-Roman arguments legitimately used by the Reformers still hold good; which means that, as a matter of urgency, we must reappraise our relationship with the Church of Rome.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1962
References
page 113 note 1 Quoted from Reformierte Kirchenzeitung, Nr. 14 (Neukirchen Kreis Moers, 15th July 1960).
page 113 note 2 Quoted from Reformiertt Kirchenzeitung, Nr. 12 (Neukirchen Kreis Moers, 15th June 1960).
page 114 note 1 Schaff, Philip, The Creeds of Christendom, Vol. II, The Greek and Latin Creeds, with translations (New York, 1877), p. 82.Google Scholar
page 114 note 2 Philip Schaff, op. cit., p. 236.
page 115 note 1 Philip Schaff, op. cit., p. 242.
page 115 note 2 Quoted from Reid, John K.S., The Authority of Scripture (London, 1957), p. 103.Google Scholar
page 115 note 3 Bouyer, Louis, Du Protestantism à I' Église (Paris, 1954)Google Scholar, quoted from Fath, Pierre, Du Catholicisme Romain au Christianisme Évangélique (Paris, 1957), p. 42.Google Scholar
page 116 note 1 Philip Schaff, op, cit., p. 80.
page 117 note 1 Philip Schaff, op. cit., p. 83.
page 117 note 2 Philip Schaff, op. cit., p. 207.
page 118 note 1 Möhler, Johann Adam, Symbolism, tr. Robertson, J. B. (London, 1906), p. 259.Google Scholar
page 118 note 2 J. A. Möhler, op. cit., p. 259.
page 118 note 3 J. A. Möhler, op. cit., p. 259.
page 118 note 4 J. A. Möhler, op. cit., p. 278.
page 119 note 1 J. A. Möhler, op. cit., p. 279.
page 119 note 2 J. A. Möhler, op. cit., p. 285.
page 119 note 3 J. A. Möhler, op. cit., p. 288.
page 119 note 4 J. A. Möhler, op. cit., p. 281.
page 119 note 5 J. A. Möhler, op. cit., pp. 292/293.
page 119 note 6 Philip Schaff, op. cit., p. 242.
page 120 note 1 Barth, Karl, Church Dogmatics, Vol. I, Part 2, tr. Thomson, G. T. and Knight, H. (Edinburgh, 1956), p. 565.Google Scholar
page 120 note 2 Philip Schaff, op. cit., pp. 270, 271.
page 121 note 1 Feckes, Carl, Zur kommenden Dcfinitnmg der Himmelfahrt Mariens (Leutersdorf am Rhien, 1950), p. 11.Google Scholar
page 121 note 2 Calon, Pierre, Corns de théologie systématique (Issy-les-Moulineaux, 1942–1943)Google Scholar quoted from Pierre Fath, op. cit., pp. 92/93.
page 122 note 1 Pierre Galon, op. cit., quoted from Pierre Fath, op. cit., p. 96.
page 122 note 2 Torrance, T. F., Conflict and Agreement in the Church, Vol. I, Order and Disorder (London, 1959), p. 152.Google Scholar
page 122 note 3 T. F. Torrance, op. cit., p. 152.
page 122 note 4 Cullman, Oscar, ‘Scripture and Tradition’, tr. Read, D. H. C., Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol. 6, No. 2 (Edinburgh and London, June 1953), p. 128; also cf. p. 127.Google Scholar
page 123 note 1 Skydsgaard, Kristen Ejner, ‘Scripture and Tradition’, Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol. 9, No. 4 (Edinburgh and London, Dec. 1956), p. 357Google Scholar; also cf. whole article.