Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-jbkpb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-15T12:02:31.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Church and Israel in the Deuteropauline Letters*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2009

Martin Rese
Affiliation:
Isolde-Kurz-Str. 139D-4400 Münster

Extract

As introduction to the topic may serve two remarks, one about the meaning and importance of the expression ‘Deuteropauline Letters’, and one about the historical and theological background of the question of the relationship between church and Israel.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The prominent theologian is Arthur C. Headlam (1862–1947), the remark was originally (1913) directed against the expression ‘Paulinism’, and I took it from Morgan's, Robert C. article on ‘The Significance of “Paulinism”,’ in: Paul and Paulinism. Essays in honour of C. K. Barrett, ed. by Hooker, M. D. and Wilson, S. G., London: SPCK, 1982, 320338, 320.Google Scholar

2 Dodd, Charles Harold, ‘The Mind of Paul: II (1934)’, in: id., New Testament Studies, Manchester University Press, 1953, 83128, 106f.Google Scholar

3 Perrin, Norman, The New Testament An Introduction. Proclamation and Parenesis, Myth and History, New York et al.: Harcourt Brace, 1974, 119.Google Scholar

4 See Pokorny, Petr, ‘Das theologische Problem der Pseudepigraphie’, EvTh 44, 1984, 486496, 489.Google Scholar

5 Parkes, James gives a good introduction to this in his preface to Antisemitism and the Foundations of Christianity, ed. by Davies, Alan, New York et al.: Paulist Press, 1979, pp. VXI.Google Scholar

6 Cf. the three volumes of Jewish and Christian Self-Definition, ed. by Sanders, Ed P. et al. , Philadelphia: Fortress/ London: SCM, 1980, 1981, 1982Google Scholar; Mussner, Franz, Tractate on the Jews. The Significance of Judaism for Christian Faith, Philadelphia: Fortress/London: SPCK, 1984Google Scholar; the two volumes of Anti-Judaism in Early Christianity, ed. by Richardson, Peter et al. , Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1986Google Scholar; Earfy Judaism and Its Modem Interpreters, ed. by Kraft, Robert A. and Nickelsburg, George W. E., Atlanta, Georgia: Scholars Press, 1986.Google Scholar

7 Morgan, I.c., 331.

8 Cf. Martin Rese, ‘Die Vorzüge Israels in Röm. 9, 4f. und Eph. 2, 12. Exegetische Anmerkungen zum Thema Kirche und Israel’, ThZ (Basel) 31, 1975, 211–222; id., ‘Die Rettung der juden nach Römer 11’, in: L ‘Apôtre Paul. Personnalit-, style, et conception du ministère (BEThL 73), par A. Vanhoye et al., Leuven: University Press, 1986, 422–430; id., ‘Israel und Kirche in Römer 9’, NTS 34, 1988, 208–217.

9 Since verse 13 is directed at Gentile Christians, verse 12 refers to Jewish Christians, as has rightly been observed by many commentators since Chrysostom.

10 So Schnackenburg, Rudolf, Der Brief an die Ephesar (EKK X), Zürich et al.: Benziger/Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1982, 109.Google Scholar

11 So Barth, Markus, Ephesians (AncB 54), Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1974, 269f. and note 71.Google Scholar

12 So Schnackenburg, I.c.. 120f.

13 By the expression ‘atheoi’ the author does not want to state that the Gentile Christians were atheists, but that they were separated from the God of Israel.

14 Cf. Barrett, Charles Kingsley, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Ramans (BNTC), London: Black, 1957, Reprint 1975, 179.Google Scholar

15 Schlier, Heinrich, Der Brief an die Epheser. Ein Kommentar, Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1957, 120.Google Scholar

16 As does Barth, Markus, The People of God (JSNT suppl. ser. 5), Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1983, 48.Google Scholar

17 O'Neill, John C., ‘The Source of Christology in Colossians’, NTS26, 1980, 87100.Google Scholar

18 Richardson, Peter, Israel in the Apostolic Church (SNTS mon. ser. 10), Cambridge: University Press, 1969, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Cf. Exodus 19, 5; 23, 22 (LXX); Deuteronomy 14, 2; 26, 18.

20 Richardson, o.c, 159 note 6.

21 Richardson, o.c, 159 note 6.