Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T15:09:33.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Karl Barth's Christological Basis for the State and Political Praxis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2009

R. E. Hood
Affiliation:
General Theological Seminary (Episcopal), Chelsea Square, New York, NY 10011

Extract

It would appear that one is an apostle of the obvious when speaking of Karl Barth's ‘christological basis’ for the state. According to G. C. Berkouwer, amongst others, to say Karl Barth is to mean simultaneously ‘christocentricism’, especially when speaking of Barth after his deliberate reversal in his dogmatics published in 1932—the date Barth published his Kirchliche Dogmatik after he discontinued writing his Christliche Dogmatik begun in 1927, which he later described as ‘my well-known false start’. But even Berkouwer, who criticises Barth for underplaying the demonic effects and influences of evil through his emphasis on grace, admits that Barth's ‘christocentricism’ has epistemological emphases not found in other theologians:

… Barth underscores with increasing emphasis that all knowledge of God is exclusively determined by and is dependent upon the knowledge of Jesus Christ, and that this is not simply a matter of our epistemology, but that it is directly related to the nature of God in Jesus Christ who is the dominant and all-controlling central factor in the doctrines of election, creation, and reconciliation. Only in Jesus Christ do we meet the true and decisive revelation of God.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 223 note 1 Church Dogmatics III/4, p. xiii.

page 223 note 2 Berkouwer, G. C., The Triumph of Grace in the Theology of Karl Barth. London: Paternoster Press, 1956, p. 18Google Scholar. See Barth's refutation of Berkouwer's charge in CD IV/3, pp. 173–180.

page 225 note 1 Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1972. See especially his chapter on Pastor Barth in the Social Democratic Party in Switzerland, pp. 39–69, and Barth's understanding of revolution in the two editions of his Romans, pp. 126–168. See also Thurneysen's description of the relationship between Barth's early theological views and religious socialism in Antwort. Zürich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1956, pp. 831864.Google Scholar

page 225 note 2 Karl Barth. Trans. Bowden, John. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1976.Google Scholar

page 225 note 3 The Humanity of God. London: Collins, 1961, p. 40.Google Scholar

page 226 note 1 Eng. Trans, by Ian W. Robertson. Richmond, Virginia: John Knox Press, 1960.

page 226 note 2 ibid., p. 11.

page 226 note 3 Cochran, Arthur C., The Church's Confession Under Hitler. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1962, p. 132.Google Scholar

page 227 note 1 Barth, , Community, State, and Church. Gloucester, Massachusetts: Peter Smith, 1968, p. 107.Google Scholar

page 227 note 2 ibid.

page 227 note 3 ibid.

page 227 note 4 op. cit., pp. 111, 113.

page 228 note 1 op. cit., pp. 113–114.

page 228 note 2 Kirchliche Dogmatik III/3. Zürich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1950, p. 535Google Scholar; Eng. Trans., pp. 458f.

page 228 note 3 Community, pp. 116–117.

page 229 note 1 op. cit., p. 118.

page 229 note 2 op. cit. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 1972, pp. 259–267.

page 230 note 1 New York: Doubleday, 1956. See particularly his chapter on ‘The Religion of Americans and American Religion’ (pp. 85–112).

page 230 note 2 Community, p. 156.

page 231 note 1 Church Dogmatics III/3, p. 73.

page 232 note 1 Systematic Theology II. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1957, p. 61.Google Scholar

page 232 note 2 CD III/3, p. 76.

page 232 note 3 Quoted in CD III/4, p. 457.

page 233 note 1 op. cit., p. 458.

page 233 note 2 op. cit., p. 467.

page 233 note 3 See his discussion of privatisation and ‘public-ness’ (Öffentlichkeit), op. cit., pp. 185–191. See also Dannemann, Ulrich, Theologie und Politik im Denken Karl Barths. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1977, p. 185.Google Scholar

page 233 note 4 Barth, , Ethik I. Braun, Dietrich, ed. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, 1973, p. 273. (Hereafter GAII/Ethik I.)Google Scholar

page 234 note 1 op. cit., p. 274.

page 234 note 2 CD III/4, p. 117.

page 234 note 3 GAII/Ethik I, p. 276.

page 234 note 4 op. cit., p. 277.

page 234 note 5 Barth, Karl, Theology and Church. Trans. Smith, Louise Pettibone. London: SCM Press, 1962, pp. 334354.Google Scholar

page 235 note 1 op. cit., p. 341.

page 235 note 2 op. cit., p. 343.

page 235 note 3 op. cit., p. 349.

page 236 note 1 CD IV/1, p. 188.

page 236 note 2 op. cit., p. 198.

page 236 note 3 Eine Schweizer Stimme, 1938–1945. 2. Auflage. Zürich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1948, p. 154.

page 237 note 1 CD III/4, p. 534.

page 237 note 2 op. cit., pp. 551–552.

page 238 note 1 op. cit., pp. 551–552.

page 238 note 2 ‘Die Kirche zwischen Ost und West’, Der Götze Wackelt. Berlin: Käthe Vogt Verlag, 1964, p. 141.Google Scholar

page 238 note 3 Eine Schweizer Stimme, p. 292.