Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T07:16:27.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A response from Amy Plantinga Pauw

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2005

Amy Plantinga Pauw
Affiliation:
Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary, 1044 Alta Vista Road, Louisville, Kentucky 40205 amypauw@lpts.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In his review of my book, Steven Studebaker asserts that Jonathan Edwards's trinitarianism is useful in challenging ‘the common assumption that Western Augustinian trinitarianism is inherently monistic and must be transcended by recourse to the Eastern trinitarian tradition’. While I find Edwards to be theologically useful for a wide variety of reasons, I am in basic agreement with Studebaker's assertion, and certainly do not share in the ‘common assumption’ about Augustinianism that he deplores.

Type
Response
Copyright
© Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 2004