Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
In twenty centuries theological anthropology has hardly seen a more revolutionary method than that proposed by Karl Barth in Church Dogmatics 111.2 of founding anthropology on Christology. At the outset, however, Barth makes clear that ‘there can be no question of a direct equation of human nature as we know it in ourselves with the human nature of Jesus, and therefore of a simple deduction of anthropology from Christology’. That is, Barth intends that the method of theological anthropology avoid monism.
page 132 note 1 C.D.111.2, p. 47. Cf. pp. 47–54, 71, 222, 512.
page 132 note 2 C.D.IV.1, p. 10.
page 132 note 3 Prenter, R., ‘Die Einheit von Schöpfung und Erlösung’, in Theologische Zritschrift, II (May-June, 1946), 180.Google Scholar
page 132 note 4 Berkouwer, , The Triumph of Grace in the Theology of Karl Barth, (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1956), 56.Google Scholar
page 132 note 5 von Balthasar, H. U., Karl Barth (Darstellung und Deutung seiner Theologie) (Jakob Hegner Bucherei, Köln und Olten, 1951), p. 148.Google Scholar
page 135 note 1 ibid., p. 131.
page 135 note 2 Kreck, , ‘Analogia fidei oder analogia entis?’, in Antwort (Evangelischer Verlag A. G., Zollikon-Zürich, 1956), p. 277.Google Scholar
