Last updated 27/06/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
There are almost as many problems connected with the study of the Dialogue as of the Synoptic Gospels. This is hardly surprising when one considers how comparatively little attention the Dialogue has received, and that in size it is comparable to the four Gospels. Among the main issues to be considered are, the aim and authenticity of the Dialogue, the mutilation of its text, the OT text which is used, and the interpretation of the OT, which is the chief interest of the present writer.
page 164 note 2 For a full discussion see Semisch, Charles, Justin Martyr, trans, from the German by Ryland, J. C. (Edinburgh, 1843), pp. 82–117Google Scholar, and Lukyn Williams, op. cit., Introduction pp. xi–xvi; also Goodenough, Erwin R., The Theology of Justin Martyr (Jena, 1923).Google Scholar
page 164 note 3 Valentine's, Jewish Encyclopaedia (London, 1938), p. 634.Google Scholar
page 164 note 4 Goodenough, op. cit., p. 97.
page 164 note 5 Dialogue viii.3 ‘dear friend’ obviously refers to ‘my dear friend Marcus Pompeius’ in cxli.5.
page 165 note 1 Goldfahn, Alex. Heinrich, ‘Justinus Martyr und die Agada’, separate issue from Monatsschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judentums (Breslau, 1873).Google Scholar
page 165 note 2 cf. D. ii and Mechilta ed. Weis p. 66b, quoted by Goldfahn, op. cit., p. 4.
page 165 note 3 Semisch, op. cit., pp. 1O3ff.
page 165 note 4 D. i.3, ix.3.
page 165 note 5 D. cxx.5.
page 165 note 6 v. infra.
page 166 note 1 cf. Eusebius, Ch. Hist., IV. xviii.6–8 and see also John of Damascus in his Sacra Parallela from the second Discourse against Trypho—‘Everyone who can say what is true and saith it not shall be judged by God’, which is an exact quotation from D. lxxxii.3 and quoted by Lukyn Williams, op. cit., p. xv.
page 166 note 2 D. lvi.16; lxxxv.4; xcii.5.
page 166 note 3 For a full discussion see Semisch, op. cit., pp. 83–88.
page 166 note 4 Testimonies 1916 and 1920. Also cf. Dodd, C. H., According to the Scriptures London, 1952)Google Scholar. Also cf. Davies, W. D., Paul and Rabbinic Judaism (London, 1955), pp. 43 and 44.Google Scholar
page 167 note 1 Philo's Bible by Walters, P. M. W. (Cambridge, 1946).Google Scholar
page 167 note 2 The writer is here indebted to an article by Wiles, M. F. in S.J.T., June 1955, see partic. p. 115.Google Scholar
page 168 note 1 D. xi.5 and cxxv.
page 168 note 2 Supra, p. 165, note 1.
page 170 note 1 Stanton, W. H.. The Jewish and the Christian Messiah (Edinburgh 1886), p. 193Google Scholar. The whole of ch. V on ‘The use of the OT in the Early Church’, is particularly pertinent for this study.
page 170 note 2 For a full discussion on this on the Patristic side, see Thackeray, H. St. John, The Relation of St. Paul to Contemporary Jewish Thought (London, 1900), ch. VII.Google Scholar
page 171 note 1 cf. the rock that followed the Israelites, 1 Cor. 10.4; Isaac and Ishmael, Gal. 4.21–31; Jannes and Jambres, 2 Tim. 38–9. See also H. St. John Thackeray, op. cit. ch. VIII. We must, however, admit that the Haggadah on Isaac and Ishmael is used against ‘the Judaisers' and that in all probability 2 Timothy 3.8–9 is not Pauline.
page 171 note 2 cf. D. xi.5, cxix.5 with Romans 11.1 and 2, 23 and 24. See also Davies, W. D., Paul and Rabbinic Judaism (London, 1955), p.75Google Scholar, and Dodd, C.H., Romans (M.N.T.G). pp. 176–183Google Scholar, exposition of Romans 11.1–32.
page 171 note 3 cf. D. xix.3 and xliii.2 with Romans 2.28 and 29.
page 171 note 4 cf. D. xvi.2, xix.2, with Romans 2.25, 3.1 and 2, Gal. 5.6 and 6.15.
page 171 note 5 cf. D. xi.i, xviii.2, xix.6, with Gal. 3.19 and 24 and Romans 7.13, also 7.7 and 8.3.
page 172 note 1 op. cit., p. 193.
page 172 note 2 D. xl.2.
page 172 note 3 Barnabas (ed. Quasten) vii.6–11.
page 172 note 4 Tertullian, adv. Marcion, ii.27 and iii.9.
page 172 note 5 cf. Barnabas ix.8, on Gen. 14.14, D. xci.1ff on Deut. 33.13–17, and Tertullian, adv. Marcion, iii.18.
page 172 note 6 cf. D. xvi.2 and cxxxiv.3 and 4, and again lxxvii and lxxviii.
page 172 note 7 Williams, Lukyn, Adversus Judaeos (Cambridge, 1935), p. 41.Google Scholar
page 172 note 8 Semisch, op. cit., pp. 103ff, See also D. p. 107, footnote 5.
page 173 note 1 cf. Jocz, Jacob, A Theology of Election (S.P.C.K., London, 1959), pp. 53ff.Google Scholar
page 173 note 2 D. xxxviii.1.
page 173 note 3 cf. D. cxlii.
page 173 note 4 cf. D. xxxix.7.
page 173 note 5 cf. D. lxxxviii.
page 174 note 1 Church Quarterly Review, April 1923, pp. 103–31 and Jacob Jocz, op. cit., p.55.
page 174 note 2 art. cit., pp. 113ff.
