Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T10:58:31.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction of soil burial and smoke on germination patterns in seeds of selected Australian native plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2007

A. Tieu ,
K. W. Dixon ,
K. A. Meney  and
K. Sivasithamparam
A. Tieu*
Affiliation:
Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority, Kings Park and Botanic Garden, West Perth, Western Australia 6005, Australia Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6907, Australia
K. W. Dixon
Affiliation:
Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority, Kings Park and Botanic Garden, West Perth, Western Australia 6005, Australia Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6907, Australia
K. A. Meney
Affiliation:
Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority, Kings Park and Botanic Garden, West Perth, Western Australia 6005, Australia
K. Sivasithamparam
Affiliation:
Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6907, Australia
*
*Correspondence Tel: 612 08 94803640 Fax: 612 08 94803641 Email: anletieu@cyllene.uwa.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Patterns of dormancy and smoke responsiveness in artificially buried seeds were investigated in eight native plant species from the species-rich mediterranean-type climate zone of south-western Australia. A comparison was made between germination and viability behaviour of shelf- and field-soil-stored seed, with and without smoke treatment, at least every 3 months. These comparisons corresponded with each of the four seasons. The species chosen germinated with the aid of smoke under field or glasshouse conditions (termed ‘dormant’; n = 4) or produced low and variable germination under glasshouse conditions with smoke (termed ‘deeply dormant’; n = 4). Three trends were observed in viability of soil-stored seeds over 450 d: no decline, gradual decline or late-onset decline. In addition, various germination responses to soil burial and aerosol smoke were observed. Burial was not required for optimal germination in Anigozanthos manglesii. However, for all other species tested, maximum germination was observed only following a period of burial. This was manifested in a germination response without smoke after a short period of burial (Stylidium affine and Conospermum triplinervium) or a longer period of burial (Conostylis neocymosa, Hibbertia commutata, Leucopogon conostephioides, Stirlingia latifolia and Stylidium crossocephalum). Smoke treatment led to high germination in buried seed of S. affine, S. crossocephalum and H. commutata. The patterns of germination detected in this limited number of species indicate that a variety of mechanisms may exist, both temporally and spatially, in south-western Australian species, and support further research of this type for horticulture and land restoration.

Keywords

burialsmokegerminationAnigozanthos manglesiiConostylis neocymosaStylidium affineStylidium crossocephalumHibbertia commutataLeucopogon conostephioidesConospermum triplinerviumStirlingia latifolia
Type
Research Article
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 69 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (1994) Germination requirements of Oenothera biennis seeds during burial under natural seasonal temperature cycles. Canadian Journal of Botany 72, 779–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (1998) Seeds: ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego, Academic Press,Google Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (1995) Variation in the annual dormancy cycle in buried seeds of the weed winter annual Viola arvensis. Weed Research 35, 353–362.Google Scholar
Bell, D.T., Plummer, J.A. and Taylor, S.K. (1993) Seed germination ecology in southwestern Western Australia. Botanical Review 59, 24–73.Google Scholar
Bell, D.T., Rokich, D.P., McChesney, C.J. and Plummer, J.A. (1995) Effects of temperature, light and gibberellic acid on the germination of seeds of 43 species native to Western Australia. Journal of Vegetation Science 6, 797–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, E.J.H. (1976) The seeds of dicotyledons. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, K.W., Roche, S. and Pate, J.S. (1995) The promotive effect of smoke derived from burnt native vegetation on seed germination of Western Australian plants. Oecologia 101, 185–192.Google Scholar
Egley, G. H. (1995) Seed germination in soil: dormancy cycles. pp. 529–543in Kigel, J.Galili, G. (Eds) Seed development and germination. New York, Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, R.J., Hilton, J.R. and Dixon, J. (1986) Evidence for an endogenous cycle of dormancy in dry stored seeds of Poa trivialis L. New Phytologist 102, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutterman, Y. (1980/81) Annual rhythm and position effect in the germinability of Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum. Israel Journal of Botany 29, 93–97.Google Scholar
Hillel, D. (1971) Soil and water: physical principles and processes. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jones, S.K., Gosling, P.G. and Ellis, R.H. (1998) Reimposition of conditional dormancy during air-dry storage of prechilled Sitka spruce seeds. Seed Science Research 8, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karssen, C. M. (1980/81) Patterns of change in dormancy during burial of seeds in soil. Israel Journal of Botany 29, 65–73.Google Scholar
Keeley, J.E. (1991) Seed germination and life history syndromes in the California chaparral. Botanical Review 57, 81–116.Google Scholar
Keeley, J.E. and Fotheringham, C.J. (1998) Smoke-induced seed germination in California chaparral. Ecology 79, 2320–2336.Google Scholar
Lamont, B.B. and Runciman, H.V. (1993) Fire may stimulate flowering, branching, seed production and seedling establishment in two kangaroo paws (Haemodoraceae). Journal of Applied Ecology 30, 256–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meney, K.A., Nielssen, G.M. and Dixon, K.W. (1994) Seed bank patterns in Restionaceae and Epacridaceae after wildfire in kwongan in southwestern Australia. Journal of Vegetation Science 5, 5–12.Google Scholar
Paynter, B.H. and Dixon, K.W. (1990) Seed viability and embryo decline in Geleznowia verrucosa Turcz. (Rutaceae). Scientia Horticulturae 45, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, S., Dixon, K.W. and Pate, J.S. (1997) Seed ageing and smoke: partner cues in the amelioration of seed dormancy in selected Australian native species. Australian Journal of Botany 45, 783–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, S., Dixon, K.W. and Pate, J.S. (1998) For everything a season – smoke-induced seed germination and seedling recruitment in a Western Australia Banksia woodland. Australian Journal of Ecology 23,111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatral, A. and Fox, J. E. D. (1994) Quality and viability of seeds in the genus Hibbertia. Seed Science and Technology 22, 273–284.Google Scholar
Tieu, A. (2000) The interaction of burial, heat and smoke in the alleviation of seed dormancy in selected southwestern Australian plant species. PhD Thesis, The University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
van Staden, J., Kelly, K.M. and Bell, W.E. (1994) The role of natural agents in the removal of coat-imposed dormancy in Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight et Arn. seeds. Plant Growth Regulation 14, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Went, F.W., Juhren, G. and Juhren, M.C. (1952) Fire and biotic factors affecting germination. Ecology 33, 351–364.Google Scholar