Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T15:22:39.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Academic Theaters and the Fate of Soviet Artistic Pluralism, 1919-1928

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Richard G. Thorpe
Richard G. Thorpe*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Houston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

While many studies of the early Soviet theater have focused upon its proletarian or revolutionary stages, in the polemics of that era a central topic of dispute was the so-called academic stage. The academic theaters of Moscow and Petrograd, which included the former imperial theaters as well as select representatives of the pre-revolutionary private stage, most notably the Arts and Kamernyi theaters, had no lack of critics or enemies in the years after October. The former court theaters were attacked as politically dangerous relics of the old regime, their artists were envied for their material privileges and status, their large budgets were coveted by less generously funded workers' and avant-garde stages, their art was condemned as conservative and out of harmony with the revolution and socialism. For Commissar of Education Anatolii Lunacharskii, however, these theaters were academies which would both preserve the best of the pre-revolutionary cultural heritage and provide standards of technical excellence against which more innovative theaters could be measured.

Type
Articles
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , Fall 1992 , pp. 389 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Support for the research upon which this article is based was provided by the International Research and Exchanges Board (with funds from the National Endowinent for the Humanities, the US Department of State and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation), by the Joint Committee on Soviet Studies of the Social Science Research Council, by the Department of History of Princeton University and by the Research Initiation Grant program of the University of Houston. Special thanks are owed to Richard Brody, Paul Christensen, Iurii Orlov and Sergei Tsakunov for their invaluable assistance.

1. The only full-scale study of the academic stage during the early Soviet era is Zolotnitskii, D., Akademicheskie teatry na putiakh Oktiabria (Leningrad: Iskusstvo, 1982 Google Scholar). A competent overview of early Soviet legislation affecting the former imperial stages is provided in P. Friel, “Theater and Revolution: The Struggle for Theatrical Autonomy in Soviet Russia (1917-1920)” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1977). The best general overview of official cultural policy through the introduction of NEP remains Fitzpatrick, Sheila, The Commissariat of Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970 Google Scholar.

2. Cohen, Stephen F., Bukharin and the Bolshevik Revolution: A Political Biography, 1888-1938 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980), 271–72Google Scholar.

3. O'Connor, Timothy E., The Politics of Soviet Culture: Anatolii Lunacharskii (Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1983 Google Scholar), 69. O'Connor now appears to have less sympathy for this interpretation of NEP. See his recent review of Christopher Read in American Historical Review 96, no. 5 (December 1991): 1584.

4. Fitzpatrick, Sheila, “The ‘Soft’ Line on Culture and Its Enemies: Soviet Cultural Policy, 1922-1927,” Slavic Review 33, no. 2 (June 1974): 267–69, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. See also Holter, Howard R., “The Legacy of Lunacharsky and Artistic Freedom in the USSR,” Slavic Review 29, no. 2 (June 1970): 262–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Kemp-Welch, A., ‘ “New Economic Policy in Culture’ and Its Enemies, “Journal of Contemporary History 13 (1978): 449–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Read, Christopher, Culture and Power in Revolutionary Russia: The Intelligentsia and the Transition from Tsarism to Communism (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1990), x CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. Read, 142-44, 232.

8. Clark, Katerina, “The ‘Quiet Revolution’ in Soviet Intellectual Life,” Russia in the Era of NEP: Explorations in Soviet Society and Culture (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991), 210–11Google Scholar.

9. Ibid., 227; Sheila Fitzpatrick, “Culture and Politics under Stalin: A Reappraisal,” Slavic Review 35, no. 2 (June 1976): 223.

10. Clark, 224-26; Read, 162-67.

11. Literally “one-boss,” a director responsible not to collegial bodies within their institution but only to his or her superiors.

12. Iuzhin-Sumbatov, A. I., Vospominaniia, zapiski, stat'i, pis'ma (Moscow-Leningrad: Iskusstvo, 1941), 62Google Scholar.

13. Central State Archive of Literature and Art (henceforth TsGALI), fond 648 (Bolshoi Theater), opis’ 2, edinitsa khraneniia 32, listy 13-15. (Archival citations will henceforth be abbreviated to f., op., d. [or ed. khr. for edinitsa khraneniia], 1.)

14. Sovetskii teatr: dokumenty i materialy, t. 1, Russkii sovetskii teatr, 1917-1921 (Leningrad: Iskusstvo, 1968), 199.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., 90.

16. Leonid Vital'evich Sobinov, t. 2, Stal'i, rechi, vyskazyvaniia … (Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1970), 55.Google Scholar

17. Read, 143.

18. Fitzpatrick, , Commissariat of Enlightenment, 140–41Google Scholar; Richard G. Thorpe, “The Management of Culture in Revolutionary Russia: The Imperial Theaters and the State, 1897-1928” (Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, 1990), 139-40.

19. Kniazevskaia, T. B., Iuzhin-Sumbatov i sovetskii teatr (Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1966), 115 Google Scholar. Emphasis in original.

20. Central Party Archive of the Institute of Marxism-Leninism, f. 142 (A. V. Lunacharskii), op. 1, d. 522, 1.1.

21. Fitzpatrick, , Commissariat of Enlightenment, 187, 190Google Scholar.

22. Lunacharskii, A. V., “Lenin ob iskusstve,” in Lunacharskii, A. V., Vospominaniia i vpechatleniia (Moscow: Sovetskaia Rossiia, 1968), 195 Google Scholar.

23. Iufit, A. Z., Revoliutsiia i teatr (Leningrad: Iskusstvo, 1977), 126–27Google Scholar.

24. Lunacharskii, , Vospominaniia i vpechatleniia, 195 Google Scholar.

25. Lenin, V. I., Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 5th ed. (Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1965), 53: 142Google Scholar.

26. Lenin, 54: 110 and note, 593-94.

27. Literaturnoe nasledstvo, t. 80, V. I. Lenin i A. V. Lunacharskii: Perepiska, doklady, dokumenty (Moscow: Nauka, 1971), 349-51.Google Scholar

28. Literaturrwe nasledstvo, 80: 312-13.

29. Lenin, 45: 700; Literaturnoe nasledstvo, 80: 313.

30. TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, d. 218, 1. 77.

31. TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, d. 218, 1. 78; “Kri/.is akademicheskikh teatrov,” Zhizn’ iskusstva, 28 November 1922.

32. TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, d. 218, 11. 79 & ob.

33. TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, d. 218, 1. 80; Ibid., d. 118, 1. 34 & ob.

34. Central State Archive of the Russian Republic (henceforth TsGA RSKSR), f. 2306 (Narkompros), op. 1, d. 3377, 1. 137.

35. Ibid., 1. 137 ob.

36. TsGA RSFSR, f. 2306, op. 1, d. 3377, 1. 160.

37. TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, d. 187, 1. 15; Central State Archive of the October Revolution (henceforth TsGAOR), f. 5508 (Union of Workers of Art), op.I, d. 293, 1. 54; Teatr i muzyka, 19 (13 February 1923): 644.

38. The weekly Petrograd artistic journal Teatr i iskusstvo provided a platform for many of these opponents of the former imperial theaters during 1917. See, for ex ample, Teatr i iskusstvo 10-11 (12 March 1917): 189; 12(19 March 1917): 213-14; 23 (4 June 1917): 396; 39 (24 September 1917): 680.

39. On the non-artistic collectives, see TsGALI, f. 878 (A. I. Iuzhin-Sumbatov), op. 1, ed. khr.99, 11. 29-30; also see Zosimovskii, V., “Professional'nye soiuzy teatral'nykh rabotnikov v period Velikoi Oktiabr'skoi revoliutsii i grazhdanskoi voiny (1917-1921 gg.),” Uchenye zapiski Vysshei shkoly profdvizheniia VTsSPS (Moscow: Izd. VTsSPS, 1968), 37 and passimGoogle Scholar. On the pre-revolutionary status and resentment of the chorus, see Teliakovskii, V., Imperatorskie teatry v 1905 godu (Leningrad: Academia, 1926), 61–69 Google Scholar; on its identification with the Union of Workers of Art, see below, note 43.

40. For example, Malinovskaia approached contract negotiations with the Union of Workers of Art with little or no willingness to bargain on any issues of significance, often dragging out negotiations or simply ignoring the need to conclude contracts. TsGAOR, f. 5508, op. 1, d. 192, 1.10; TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, ed. khr.218, 11. 37-39; TsGAOR, f. 5508, op. 1, d. 192, 11.33, 36.

41. TsGA RSFSR, f. 2307 (Glavnauka), op. 7, d. 4, 1. 38 & ob.; TsGA RSFSR, f. 2306, op. 1, d. 3397, 1. 84.

42. Literaturnoe nasledstvo 80: 282.

43. TsGAOR, f. 5508, op. 1, d. 142, 1. 13, 15.

44. TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, d. 187, 1. 38. This followed an abortive attempt to fire many of the same members of the Bolshoi chorus in mid-1922, forestalled at that time by pressure from the union. TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, ed. khr.230, 1. 13; ibid., ed. khr. 128, 1. 5.

45. TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, d. 3, 11. 32 & ob.; TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, d. 187, 11. 89 ob., 90-91, 106 & ob.; TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, d. 265, 1. 47; TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, d. 271, 1. 8.

46. Zrelishche 63 (20-25 November 1923): 12.

47. TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, d. 187, 1. 90 ob.

48. TsGA RSFSR, f. 2306, op. 1, d. 2246, 1. 20.

49. Ibid., 1. 21.

50. TsGA RSFSR f. 2306, op. 1, d. 2246, 11. 31-42.

51. TsGAOR, f. 5508, op. 1, d. 245, 1. 94.

52. Ibid., 1. 53.

53. TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, d. 176, 1. 21. In line with this support, there was an abortive attempt in late 1923 to transfer the academic theaters to the direct supervision of TslK SSSR, in the hopes that subordination to an all-Union body would provide some measure of protection against their critics who now made up the majority of the Narkompros collegium (the Commissariat being a republic level agency). TsGA RSFSR, f. 2306, op. 7, d. 4, 1. 51.

54. TsGA RSFSR, f. 2306, op. 1, d. 3397, 11. 84 ob.-85.

55. TsGA RSFSR, f. 2306, op. 1, d. 2945, 11. 68-69.

56. Otchet o rabote Moskovskogo gubernskogo otdela Vserabisa za period s 1 maia 1923 g. po 1 maia 1924 g. (Moscow: Izd. Mosgubrabisa, 1924), 49.Google Scholar

57. TsGA RSFSR, f. 2306, op. 1, d. 2700, 11. 7-11.

58. Ibid., 1. 28.

59. TsGA RSFSR, f. 2306, op. 1, d. .'5397, 1. 126.

60. TsGA RSFSR, f. 2306, op. 1, d. 3397, II. 127 & ob.

61. TsGA RSFSR, f. 2306, op. 1, d. 3397, 11. 242-43.

62. Literaturnoe nasledstvo, t. 82, A. V. Lunacharskii. Neizdannye materialy (Moscow: Nauka, 1970), 408.Google Scholar

63. TsGALI, f. 878, op. 1, d. 117, 1. 8.

64. TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, ed. khr. 334, 1. 20, 28; Zrelishche 83-84 (28 April-4 May 1924): 16; Rabochii zritel’ 19 (14 September 1924): 11.

65. Zrelishche 85 (6-11 May 1924): 13.

66. “Puti i zadachi Bol'shogo teatra. Beseda s direktorom Bol'shogo teatra A. A. Burdukovym,” Programmy gosudarstvennykh akademicheskikh teatrov 2(11-17 January 1927): 14.

67. Lunacharskaia-Rozenel', N., Pamiat’ sertsa: vospominaniia (Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1965), 141–43Google Scholar. Rozenel''s chronology of events cannot be accepted, as it conflicts with other documents; her characterization of the administrative relations of lakovleva and Lunacharskii is, however, consistent with other evidence.

68. TsGAOR, f. 5508, op. 1, d. 336, 11. 22 ob.-23; TsGALI, f. 649 (Malyi Theater), op. 1, d. 272, 1.6; TsGALI, f. 649, op. 1, d. 267, 1. 49.

69. Chizhova, L. M., “Partiinoe rukovodstvo stanovleniem sovetskogo teatra, 1926-1932 gg.,” Voprosy istorii KPSS 3 (1989): 75.Google Scholar

70. Sovetskii teatr: dokumenty i materialy, t. 3, Russkii sovetskii teatr, 1921-1926 (Leningrad: Iskusstvo, 1975), 153.Google Scholar

71. TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, ed. khr. 351, 1. 15.

72. Interview with Khudashev, Khudozhnik i zritel’ 4-5 (1924): 41.

73. Ibid., 41; TsGALI, f. 649, op. 1, ed. khr. 308, 11.28, 30.

74. N. Sh., “Ekonomicheskie itogi sezona v gosudarstvennykh akademicheskikh teatrakh,” Sovelskoe iskusstvo 2 (May 1925): 50-51; TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, ed. khr. 416, I. 20; Iskusstvo trudiashchimsia 2 (9-14 December 1924): 23; “O rabote Bol'shogo teatra (beseda s G. A. Koloskovym),” Programmy gosudarstvennykh akademicheskhikh teatrov 17 (13-19 January 1926): 9-10.

75. Iskusstvo trudiashchimsia 40 (1 September 1925): 12; TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, ed. khr. 377, 1. 55; ibid., ed. khr. 29, 1. 54 ob.; ibid., ed. khr. 520, 1.1 and ob.

76. Ibid., 1. 1 & ob.; “Plenum TsK Rabisa,” Trud, 2 December 1926.

77. Programmy gosudarstvennyh akademicheskikh teatrov 6 (8-15 February 1927): 3.

78. TsGALI, f. 649, op. 1, ed. khr. 308, 11.26 & ob.

79. TsGALI, f. 648, op. 2, ed. khr. 421, 11.51 ob.-52.

80. TsGALI, f. 649, op. 1, ed. khr. 308, 1. 67; Sh., “Ekonomicheskie perspektivy sezona v gosakteatrakh,” Sovetskoe iskusstvo 9 (December 1925): 41.

81. Read, 142-44.