Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T08:24:46.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Innovation and Social Policy – Promises and Risks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2014

Stephen Sinclair  and
Simone Baglioni
Stephen Sinclair
Affiliation:
Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University E-mail: Stephen.sinclair@gcu.ac.uk
Simone Baglioni
Affiliation:
Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University E-mail: simone.baglioni@gcu.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Social innovation (SI) is an increasingly prominent but contested issue in discussions of social policy reform. Although not yet a familiar concept, nor widely understood (least of all by policy makers), it has entered mainstream policy discourses. However whether SI marks a significant departure in either theory or in practice, or merely in rhetoric, remains to be determined. This Review Article, and the Themed Section as a whole, aims to set out some of the questions social policy analysts should ask about SI, and to help clarify whether or not it is a significant development which merits attention. The Review begins by considering some of the reasons for the recent interest shown in SI before clarifying the meaning of the concept and outlining some of the different forms SI has taken. This discussion is followed by a consideration of some of the practical and theoretical questions which SI raises for social policy analysis. The Review concludes that social policy analysts cannot afford to ignore SI, but that the most effective contribution the discipline can make is to apply a critical empirical perspective to test the significance, value and impact of SI.

Type
Themed Section on Social Innovation and Social Policy
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 469 - 476
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcock, P. (2005) ‘“Maximum feasible understanding” – lessons from previous wars on poverty’, Social Policy and Society, 4, 3, 321–9.Google Scholar
Bason, C. (2010) Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a Better Society, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
BEPA (2010) Empowering People, Driving Change: Social Innovation in the European Union, Luxembourg: European Union/Bureau of European Policy Advisers.Google Scholar
Borzaga, C. and Bodini, C. (2012) What to Make of Social Innovation? Towards a Framework for Policy Development, EURICSE Working Paper No. 036/12, Trento.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office (2009) Power in People's Hands: Learning from the World's Best Public Services, London: Cabinet Office/HM Treasury.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office (2011) Open Services White Paper, CM8145, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Caulier-Grice, J., Davies, A., Patrick, R. and Norman, W. (2012) ‘Defining social innovation: a deliverable of the project’, The Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundations for Building Social Innovation in Europe, European Commission – 7th Framework Programme, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.Google Scholar
Conger, S. (1996) ‘Social inventions’, The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 1 (2), article 1.Google Scholar
European Commission (2010) Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union, SEC (2010) 1161, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Gerometta, J., Haussermann, H. and Longo, G. (2005) ‘Social Innovation and civil society in urban governance: strategies for an inclusive city’, Urban Studies, 42, 11, 2007–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, R. (2011) ‘“New” models of social finance’, Bulletin 86, Centre for Local Economic Strategies, http://www.cles.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/No-86-New-models-of-social-finance.pdf (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
Hawkins, D. (1966) ‘Learning the unteachable’, in Schulman, L. S. and Keislar, E. R. (eds.), Learning by Discovery: A Critical Appraisal, Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Jacques, R. (1996) Manufacturing the Employee: Management Knowledge from the 19th to 21st Centuries, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavra, L. (2011) Growing Social Enterprises: Research Into Social Replication, London: Social Enterprise Coalition.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1949) ‘On Sociological theories of the middle range’, Social Theory and Social Structure, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Mooney, G. (2010) ‘The disadvantaged working class as “problem” population: the “broken society” and class misrecognition’, Concept: The Journal of Contemporary Community Education Practice Theory, 1, 3.Google Scholar
Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E. and Gonzalez, S. (2005) ‘Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation’, Urban Studies, 42, 11, 1969–90.Google Scholar
Mulgan, G., Caulier-Grice, J. and Pulford, L. (2010) ‘Study on social innovation’, Paper prepared by the Social Innovation Exchange and the Young Foundation for the Bureau of European Policy Advisors, London: Young Foundation.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. A., Deiglmeier, K. and Miller, T.D. (2008) ‘Rediscovering social innovation’, Social Innovation Review, http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/rediscovering_social_innovation (accessed 20 August 2013).Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1970) ‘Concept misformation in comparative politics’, The American Political Science Review, 64, 4, 1033–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Social Innovation Exchange (2010) Study on Social Innovation, London: Young Foundation.Google Scholar
Social Innovation Generation, Canada (2010) Social Innovation: A Primer, http://sigeneration.ca/primer.html (accessed 20 August 2013).Google Scholar
Teasdale, P. (2011). ‘What's in a name? Making sense of social enterprise discourses’, Public Policy and Administration, 27, 2, 99–119.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. and Davies, A. (2005) ‘Theorizing the micropolitics of resistance: new public management and managerial identities in the UK public services’, Organization Studies, 26, 5, 683–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit-Wilson, J. (2012) ‘Heading back to the Poor Law?’, Poverty and Social Exclusion, http://www.poverty.ac.uk/articles-attitudes-benefits-welfare-system-editors-pick/heading-back-poor-law (accessed 20 August 2013).Google Scholar