Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T21:24:24.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hand in Hand or Under the Thumb? A New Perspective on Social Welfare in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

Laratta Rosario
Laratta Rosario*
Affiliation:
The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, Japan E-mail: rosariolaratta@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The nature of the relationship between state and nonprofit organisations in Japan is usually described in one of two ways. It is either disparaged as an example of co-optation and state domination, with nonprofit organisations always having been the subservient partner, or lauded as the apotheosis of co-operation and interdependence. By focusing on the historical background of the welfare system in Japan, and particularly on the legal framework in which the nonprofit sector has developed, this paper attempts to explain how each has influenced the other and highlights key factors which may have been underestimated or misinterpreted in the past.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 307 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adachi, K. (1999), ‘The development of non-profit organizations within the community welfare system in Japan’, Sociology on Social Welfare Reform in Japan, Harvest Sha.Google Scholar
Amenomori, T. (1997), ‘Japan’, in Salamon, L. M. and Anheier, H. K. (eds.), Defining the Nonprofit Sector, Manchester/New York, Manchester University Press, pp. 188–214.Google Scholar
Civil Society Monitor (1996–2007), Issues 1 (Fall 1996) to 12 (Fall 2007), Japan Center for International Exchange, JCIE Publications.Google Scholar
Estevez-Abe, M. (2003), ‘State–society partnerships in the Japanese welfare state’, in Schwartz, F. J. and Pharr, S. J. (eds.), The State of Civil Society in Japan, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, R. (1998), ‘The “Japanese Style Welfare State” and the delivery of personal social services’, in Goodman, R., White, G. and Huck-ju, K. (eds.), The East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hastings, S. A. (1995), Neighborhood and Nation in Tokyo, 1905–1937, Pittsburgh and London: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirata, K. (2002), Civil Society in Japan: The Growing Role of NGOs in Tokyo's Aid and Development Policy, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japan Ministry of Economic Planning Agency (1979), NewSocial and Economic Seven-Year Plan, Tokyo: Economic Planning Agency.Google Scholar
Japan Ministry of Health and Welfare (1993), A Vision for Welfare in the 21st Century, Tokyo: Health and Welfare Agency.Google Scholar
Kuroda, K. and Imata, K. (2003), ‘Evolution of “legitimacy”: discussion of international development NGOs and its absence in Japan’, paper presented to ARNOVA Annual Conference, Denver, United States, 20−2 November.Google Scholar
Kusumi, T. (2002), ‘The current situation and issues of Japan's government–NPO relations’, in Watanabe, K. and Partee, B. H. (eds.), The Present State of Nonprofit Sector in Japan, Tokyo: Japan NPO Center and the United States Embassy of Japan, pp. 23–29.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, T. (2003), ‘Dynamics of the Japanese welfare state in comparative perspective: between “three worlds” and the developmental state’, The Japanese Journal of Social Security Policy, 2, 2.Google Scholar
Osborne, S. (2003), The Voluntary and Non-profit Sector in Japan: An Emerging Response to a Changing Society, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavolini, E. (2003), Le nuove politiche sociali, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Pekkanen, R. and Simon, K. (2003), ‘The legal framework for voluntary and not-for-profit activity in Japan’, in Osborne, S. (ed.), The Voluntary and Nonprofit Sector in Japan, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ritu, V. (2008), Japanese Modernity and Welfare: State, Civil Society, and Self in Contemporary Japan, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (1995), Partners in Public Service: Government–Nonprofit Relations in Modern Welfare State, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinge, M., Mitchell, S. and Gray, B. H. (2004), ‘Restoring public legitimacy to the nonprofit sector: a survey experiment using descriptions of nonprofit ownership’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 4, 673–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, F. J. (1998), Advice and Consent: The Politics of Consultation in Japan, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suda, Y. and Asakawa, N. (2006), ‘Strategies developed and dilemmas experienced by skilled-nursing homes under the long-term care insurance system: an exploratory study’, Japanese Journal of Social Services, 4.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. (2001), ‘Partnership: insiders and outsiders’, in Harris, M. and Rochester, C. (eds.), Voluntary Organisations and Social Policy in Britain: Perspectives on Change and Choice, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisbrod, B. A. (1977), ‘Toward a theory of the voluntary nonprofit sector in a three-sector economy’, in Weisbrod, B. A. (ed.), The Voluntary Nonprofit Sector, Toronto: Lexington Books, pp. 51–76.Google Scholar
Young, D. R. (1999), ‘Complementary or adversarial? A theoretical and historical examination of nonprofits and government relations in the United States’, in Boris, E. T. and Steuerle, C. E. (eds.), Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict, Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, pp. 31–67.Google Scholar
Young, D. R. (2000), ‘Alternative models of government–nonprofit sector relations: theoretical and international perspectives’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1, 29, 149–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar