Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-xdx58 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T02:59:28.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychosis and Human Rights: Conflicts in Mental Health Policy and Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

Helen Spandler
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, University of Central Lancashire E-mail: HSpandler@uclan.ac.uk
Tim Calton
Affiliation:
Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham

Abstract

This paper examines conflicts in polices in England and Wales pertaining to the demand for alternative, non-medical crisis support for those experiencing ‘psychosis’. We examine the limitations of current treatment, policy and legislative frameworks in supporting these demands. In particular, we focus on the limitations of prevailing conceptualisations of ‘human rights’, ‘social inclusion’ and ‘recovery’. These concepts, we argue, are embedded within a broader treatment framework which renders medication as mandatory and all other treatment modalities as inherently subsidiary, and a broader policy framework which is complicit with bio-medical orthodoxies of ‘mental illness’ and prioritises treatment compliance and compulsion. Therefore, in order to advance a ‘human rights’ approach to mental health policy, we argue that reigning orthodoxies inherent within policy and practice must be explicitly challenged to open up spaces for the availability of alternatives.

Type
Themed Section on Mental Health and Human Rights
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, W. A. (1993), ‘Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s’, Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16, 1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentall, R. P. (2004), Madness Explained: Psychosis and Human Nature, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Bentall, R. P. and Morrison, A. P. (2002), ‘More harm than good: the case against using anti-psychotic drugs to prevent severe mental illness’, Journal of Mental Health, 11, 4, 351–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bindman, J., Maingay, S. and Szmukler, G. (2003), ‘The Human Rights Act and Mental Health Legislation’, British Journal of Psychiatry, 182, 91–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyle, M. ‘From “schizophrenia” to “psychosis”: paradigm shift or more of the same?’, from Division of Clinical Psychology Annual Conference, December 2006, London.Google Scholar
Bracken, P. (2007), ‘Beyond paradigms: promoting a recovery agenda in mental health’, http://www.soteria.freeuk.com/Brackenbeyond.htm.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Funk, S. (1986), ‘Tardive dyskinesia: barriers to the professional recognition of iatrogenic disease’, Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 27, 116–32.Google Scholar
Cadman, L. J. (2006), ‘A geneology of (bio) political contestation during the reform of the Mental Health Act 1983 in England and Wales’, Dept Geography, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Cairns, R., Maddock, C. and Buchanan, A. (2005), ‘Prevalence and predictors of mental incapacity in psychiatric in-patients’, British Journal of Psychiatry, 187, 379–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calton, T., Ferriter, M., Huband, N. and Spandler, H. (2008), ‘A systematic review of the Soteria paradigm for the treatment of people diagnosed with schizophrenia’, Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34, 1, 181–92.Google Scholar
Calton, T. and Spandler, H. (2009), ‘Minimal medication approaches to the treatment of people diagnosed with schizophrenia’, Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, P. (2000). ‘A service user/survivor position on psychiatric drugs: key points for discussion’, http://www.critpsynet.freeuk.com/Drugsposition.htm.Google Scholar
Clarke, I. (2001), Psychosis and Spirituality: Exploring the New Frontier, London: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar
Day, J. C., Wood, G., Dewey, M., and Bentall, R. P. (1995), ‘A self-rating scale for measuring neuroleptic side effects: validation in a group of schizophrenic patients’, British Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 650653.Google Scholar
Dean, H. (2008), ‘Social policy and human rights: rethinking the engagement’, Social Policy and Society, 7, 1, 112.Google Scholar
Derbyshire Voice (2008), ‘On the receiving end: the emotional and psychological impact of psychiatric assault’, Derbyshire Voice, Ripley.Google Scholar
DoH (1999a), Review of the Mental Health Act 1983: A Report of the Expert Committee, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
DoH (2001), The Journey to Recovery: The Government's vision for Mental Health Care, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
DoH (2003), Building on the Best: Choice, Responsiveness and Equity in the NHS, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
DoH (1999b), National Service Framework for Mental Health: Modern Standards and Service Model, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
DoH (1999c), Reform of the Mental Health Act 1983: Proposals for Consultation, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Double, D. (2004), ‘Suspension of doctors: medical suspensions may have ideological nature’, British Medical Journal, 328, 709–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Double, D. B. (2006), Critical Psychiatry: The Limits of Madness, New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, P. (2004) ‘Creeping conditionality in the UK: from welfare rights to conditional entitlements’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29, 2, 265–87.Google Scholar
Fawcett, B. (2007), ‘Consistencies and inconsistencies: mental health, compulsory treatment and community capacity building in England, Wales and Australia’, British Journal of Social Work, 37, 1027–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, S. (2003), Cultural Diversity, Mental Health and Psychiatry: The Struggle Against Racism, Hove and New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
Fernando, S. (2008). ‘We Shall Overcome!’, Openmind, 149, Jan/Feb, 25.Google Scholar
Gale, J., Realpe, J. and Pedriali, E. (2008), Therapeutic Communities for Psychosis: Philosophy, History and Clinical Practice, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gottstein, J. (2007), ‘Money, rights and alternatives: enforcing legal rights as a mechanism for creating non-medical alternatives’, in Stastny, P. and Lehmann, P. (eds), Alternatives Beyond Psychiatry, Berlin: Peter Lehmann Publishing, pp. 308–17.Google Scholar
Halliburton, M. (2004), ‘Finding a fit: psychiatric pluralism in South India and its implications for WHO studies of mental disorder’, Transcultural Psychiatry, 41, 1, 8098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopper, K., Harrison, G., Aleksander, J. and Sartiorius, N. (2004), Recovery from Schizophrenia: An International Perspective, Madison, CO: International Universities Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Knight, T. (2008), Beyond Belief-Alternative Ways of Working with Delusions, Obsessions and Unusual Experiences, Berlin: Peter Lehmann Publishing.Google Scholar
Larsen, J. A. (2004), ‘Finding meaning in first episode psychosis: experience, agency and the cultural repertoire’, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 18, 4, 447–71.Google Scholar
Lewander, T. (1994), ‘Neuroleptics and the neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome’, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 89, 813.Google Scholar
May, R. (2004), ‘Making sense of psychotic experiences and working towards recovery’, in Gleeson, J. F. M. and McGorry, P. D. (eds.), Psychological Interventions in Early Psychosis, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp. 245–60.Google Scholar
MCA (2005), Mental Capacity Act, London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
McCabe, R. e. a. (2002), ‘Engagement of patients with psychosis in consultation: conversation analytic study’, British Medical Journal, 325, 1148–51.Google Scholar
Mental Health Alliance (2005), Towards a Better Mental Health Act, London: Mental Health Alliance.Google Scholar
Meuser, K. T., Corrigan, P. W., Hilton, P. W., Tansman, B., Schaub, A. and Gingerich, S. (2002), ‘Illness management and recovery: a review of the research’, Psychiatric Services, 51, 10, 1272–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncrieff, J. (2007), The Myth of the Chemical Cure: A Critique of Psychiatric Drug Treatment, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NICE (2002), Schizophrenia: Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Primary and Secondary Care, London: National Institute for Clincial Excellence.Google Scholar
Nithsdale, V., Davies, J. and Croucher, P. (2008), ‘Psychosis and the experience of employment’, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18, 2, 175–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyebode, F. (2004), ‘Invited commentary on “the rediscovery of recovery”’, Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 10, 48–9.Google Scholar
Parr, H. (2008), Mental Health and Social Space: Towards Inclusionary Geographies, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Plumb, A. (1999), ‘New mental health legislation: a lifesaver? Changing paradigm and practice’, Social Work Education, 18, 4, 459–78.Google Scholar
Plumb, A. (1994), Distress or Disability: A Discussion Document, Manchester: GMCDP Publications.Google Scholar
Plumb, A. (2002), ‘Review article of From Psychiatric Patient to Citizen: Overcoming Discrimination and Social Exclusion by Liz Sayce’, Social Work Education, 21, 1, 117–23.Google Scholar
Rankin, J. (2005), Mental Health in the Mainstream: Mental Health and Social Inclusion, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Read, J., Haslam, N., Sayce, L. and Davies, E. (2006), ‘Prejudice and schizophreina: a review of the “mental illness is an illness like any other” approach’, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 114, 5, 303–18.Google Scholar
Read, J., Van Os, J., Morrison, A. P. and Ross, C. A. (2005), ‘Childhood trauma, psychosis and schizophrenia: a literature review with theoretical and clinical implications’, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 112, 330–50.Google Scholar
Repper, J. and Perkins, R. (2003), Social Inclusion and Recovery: A Model for Mental Health Practice, London: Bailliere Tindall.Google Scholar
Rogers, A., Day, J., Williams, B., Randall, F., Wood, P., Healy, D. and Bentall, R. P. (1998), ‘The meaning and management of neuroleptic medication: a study of patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia’, Social Science and Medicine, 47, 1313–23.Google Scholar
Rogers, A. and Pilgrim, D. (2001), Mental Health Policy in Britain, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCIE (2007), A Common Purpose: Recovery in Future Mental Health Services, London: Social Care Institute for Exellence.Google Scholar
Secker, J., Grove, B., and Seebohm, P. (2001), ‘Challenging barriers to employment, training and education for mental health service users: the service users' perspective’, Journal of Mental Health, 10, 4, 395404.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, T. and Watson, N. (2002), ‘The social model of disability: an outdated ideology?’, Research in Social Science and Disability, 2, 928.Google Scholar
Sheehan, K. A. and Molodynski, A. (2007), ‘Compulsion and freedom in community mental health care’, Psychiatry, 6, 9, 393–8.Google Scholar
Shepherd, G., Boardman, J. and Slade, M. (2008), Making Recovery a Reality, London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.Google Scholar
Spandler, H. (2007), ‘From social exclusion to inclusion? A critique of the inclusion imperative in mental health’, Medical Sociology online, 2, 2, 316.Google Scholar
Stastny, P. and Lehmann, P. (2007), Alternatives Beyond Psychiatry, Berlin: Peter Lehmann Publishing.Google Scholar
Szmukler, G. (2004), ‘Mental Health Legislation in the era of community psychiatry’, Psychiatry, 3, 3, 1619.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. and Thomas, T. (2004), ‘The impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on mental health care’, Psychiatry, 3, 3, 20–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasak, K. (1982), The International Dimensions of Human Rights, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Warner, R. (2004), Recovery from Schizophrenia: Psychiatry and Political Economy, 3rd edn, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Warner, R. (2008), ‘Problems with early and very early intervention in psychosis’, British Journal of Psychiatry Supplement, 187, 48, 104–7.Google Scholar