Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T00:12:51.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic, Demographic, and Anthropometric Correlates of First Marriage in the Mid-Nineteenth-Century United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

J. David Hacker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the importance of marriage for the economic and demographic history of the nineteenth-century United States, there are few published estimates of the timing and incidence of marriage and no published studies of its correlates before 1890, when the Census Office first tabulated marital status by age, sex, and nativity. In this article I rely on the 1860 Integrated Public Use Microdata Series census sample to construct national and regional estimates of white nuptiality by nativity and sex and to test theories of marriage timing. I supplement this analysis with two new public use samples of Civil War soldiers. The Gould sample, collected by the U.S. Sanitary Commission between 1863 and 1865, allows me to test whether height and body mass influenced white men's propensity to marry. Additionally, a sample of Union Army recruits linked to the 1860 census, created as part of the Early Indicators of Later Work Levels, Disease, and Death project, allows me to combine suspected economic, demographic, and anthropometric correlates of marriage into a multivariate model of never-married white men's entrance into first marriage. The results indicate that nuptiality was moderately higher in 1860 than it was in 1890. In contrast to previous studies that emphasize the primary importance of land availability and farm prices, I find that single women's opportunity to participate in the paid labor force was the most important determinant of marriage timing. I also find modest support for the hypothesis that height affected men's propensity to marry, consistent with the theory that body size was a sign to potential marriage partners of future earnings capacity and health.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , Fall 2008 , pp. 307 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atack, Jeremy, and Bateman, Fred (1987) To Their Own Soil: Agriculture in the Antebellum North. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Averett, Susan, and Korenman, Sanders (1996) “The economic reality of the beauty myth.” Journal of Human Resources 31: 304–30.Google Scholar
Baten, Jörg, and Murray, John E. (1998) “Women's stature and marriage markets in nineteenth century Bavaria.” Journal of Family History 23: 124–35.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1981) A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Block, William C. (2000) “‘A princely gift indeed’: Agricultural opportunity and marriage in the United States, 1850–1920.” PhD diss., University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan B., Ransom, Roger L., and Sutch, Richard (2004) “Family matters: The life-cycle transition and the antebellum American fertility decline,” in Guinnane, T. W., Sundstrom, W. A., and Whatley, W. (eds.) History Matters: Essays on Economic Growth, Technology, and Demographic Change. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press: 271–327.Google Scholar
Cherlin, Andrew J. (1980) “Postponing marriage: The influence of young women's work expectations.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 42: 355–65.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansley J., and Zelnik, Melvin (1963) New Estimates of Fertility and Population in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Costa, Dora L. (2004) “The measure of man and older age mortality: Evidence from the Gould sample.” Journal of Economic History 64: 1–23.Google Scholar
Dixon, Ruth (1971) “Explaining cross-cultural variations in age of marriage and proportion never marrying.” Population Studies 25: 215–33.Google Scholar
Dublin, Thomas (1994) Transforming Women's Work: New England Lives in the Industrial Revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A. (1973) “Relative economic status and the American fertility swing,” in Sheldon, E. B. (ed.) Family Economic Behavior: Problems and Prospects. Philadelphia: Lippincott: 170–223.Google Scholar
Faust, Kimberly (2004) “Marriage, divorce, and family groups,” in Siegel, J. S. and Swanson, D. A. (eds.) The Methods and Materials of Demography. London: Elsevier: 191–210.Google Scholar
Fitch, Catherine A. (2005) “Transitions to marriage in the United States, 1850–2000.” PhD diss., University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Fitch, Catherine A., and Ruggles, Steven (2000) “Historical trends in marriage formation: The United States, 1850–1990,” in Waite, Linda J., Bachrach, Christine, Hindin, Michelle, Thomson, Elizabeth, and Thornton, Arland (eds.) The Ties That Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation. New York: de Gruyter: 59–88.Google Scholar
Forster, Colin, and Tucker, G. S. L. (1972) Economic Opportunity and White American Fertility Ratios, 1800–1860. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Goldscheider, Frances K., and Waite, Linda J. (1986) “Sex differences in the entry to marriage.” American Journal of Sociology 92: 91–109.Google Scholar
Greven, Philip J. Jr. (1970) Four Generations: Population, Land, and Family in Colonial Andover, Massachusetts. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Guest, Avery M. (1981) “Social structure and U.S. inter-state fertility differentials in 1900.” Demography 18: 465–86.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. David (1996) “Adult mortality in early New England: Evidence from the graduates of Yale College, 1701–1805.” MA thesis, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. David (1999) “The human cost of war: White population in the United States, 1850–1880.” PhD diss., University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. David (2003) “Rethinking the ‘early’ decline of marital fertility in the United States.” Demography 40: 605–20.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R. (1996) “Long-term marriage patterns in the United States from colonial times to the present.” History of the Family 1: 15–39.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R. (2000) “The white population of the United States, 1790–1920,” in Haines, Michael R. and Steckel, Richard H. (eds.) A Population History of North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 305–70.Google Scholar
Hajnal, John (1953) “Age at marriage and proportions marrying.” Population Studies 7: 111–36.Google Scholar
Hatcher, John (2003) “Understanding the population history of England, 1450–1750.” Past and Present, no. 180: 83–130.Google Scholar
Houdaille, Jacques (1995) “Puritans and Virginians.” Population: An English Selection 7: 204–10.Google Scholar
Hu, Yuanreng, and Goldman, Noreen (1990) “Mortality differentials by marital status: An international comparison.” Demography 27: 233–50.Google Scholar
Knights, Peter R. (1991) Yankee Destinies: The Lives of Ordinary Nineteenth-Century Bostonians. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Landale, Nancy S. (1989) “Agricultural opportunity and marriage: The United States at the turn of the century.” Demography 26: 203–18.Google Scholar
Landale, Nancy S., and Tolnay, Stuart E. (1991) “Group differences in economic opportunity and the timing of marriage: Blacks and whites in the rural South, 1910.” American Sociological Review 56: 33–45.Google Scholar
Levine, David (1977) Family Formation in an Age of Nascent Capitalism. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Lindert, Peter H. (1988) “Long-run trends in American farmland values.” Agricultural History 62: 45–88.Google Scholar
Margo, Robert A. (2000) “The labor force in the nineteenth century,” in Engerman, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert E. (eds.) The Cambridge Economic History of the United States. Vol. 2, The Long Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 207–43.Google Scholar
McCusker, John J., and Menard, Russell R. (1985) The Economy of British America, 1607–1789. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Modell, John, Furstenberg, Frank F. Jr., and Strong, Douglas (1978) “The timing of marriage in the transition to adulthood: Continuity and change, 1860–1975,” in Demos, John and Boocock, Sarane Spence (eds.) Turning Points: Historical and Sociological Essays on the Family. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 120–50.Google Scholar
Monahan, Thomas P. (1951) The Age at Marriage in the United States. Philadelphia: Stephenson.Google Scholar
Monarch, Ryan (2005) Measuring Wartime Stress through Differential Effects of Associative Mortality on Marriage Decisions for Union Army Veterans. Chicago: University of Chicago, Center for Population Economics.Google Scholar
Murray, John E. (2000) “Marital protection and marital selection: Evidence from a historical-prospective sample of American men.” Demography 37: 511–21.Google Scholar
Pagnini, Deanna L., and Morgan, S. Philip (1990) “Intermarriage and social distance among U.S. immigrants at the turn of the century.” American Journal of Sociology 96: 405–32.Google Scholar
Razzell, Peter (1993) “The growth of population in eighteenth-century England: A critical reappraisal.” Journal of Economic History 53: 743–71.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven (1992) “Migration, marriage, and mortality: Correcting sources of bias in English family reconstitutions.” Population Studies 46: 507–22.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven (1995) “Family interrelationships.” Historical Methods 28: 52–58.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven (1996) “The rise of divorce and separation in the United States, 1880–1990.” Demography 34: 455.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, Sobek, Matthew, Alexander, J. Trent, Fitch, Catherine A., Goeken, Ron, Hall, Patricia Kelly, King, Miriam, and Ronnander, Chad (2004) Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 3.0 [machine-readable database], usa.ipums.org/usa. Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Warren C. (1979) “Quantitative aspects of marriage, fertility, and family limitation in nineteenth century America: Another application of the Coale specifications.” Demography 16: 339–58.Google Scholar
Schofield, Roger S. (1985) “English marriage patterns revisited.” Journal of Family History 10: 2–20.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel Scott (1977) “A homeostatic demographic regime: Patterns in West European family reconstruction studies,” in Demos, Lee Ronald (ed.) Population Patterns in the Past. New York: Academic: 19–51.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel Scott (1980) “A Malthusian-frontier interpretation of United States demographic history before c. 1815,” in Borah, Woodrow, Hardoy, Jorge, and Stelter, Gilbert A. (eds.) Urbanization in the Americas: The Background in Comparative Perspective. Ottawa, ON: History Division, National Museum of Man: 15–24.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel Scott (1987) “‘Early' fertility decline in America: A problem in family history,” in Hareven, Tamara and Plakans, Andrejs (eds.) Family History at the Crossroads: A Journal of Family History Reader. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 73–84.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel Scott (1993) “American family and demographic patterns and the Northwest European model.” Continuity and Change 8: 389–415.Google Scholar
Taeuber, Conrad, and Taeuber, Irene B. (1958) The Changing Population of the United States. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Office (1860) Eighth Census, United States. Act of Congress of Twenty-third May, 1850. Instructions to U.S. Marshalls. Instructions to Assistants. Washington, DC: Geo. W. Bowman.Google Scholar
Viechnecki, Peter (2003) “Properties and availability of the Union Army life-cycle sample,” in Costa, Dora L. (ed.) Health and Labor Force Participation over the Life Cycle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 323–34.Google Scholar
Vinovskis, Maris A. (1976) “Socio-economic determinants of interstate fertility differentials in the United States in 1850 and 1860.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 6: 375–96.Google Scholar
Waite, Linda J. (1995) “Does marriage matter?” Demography 32: 483–507.Google Scholar
Waite, Linda J., and Spitz, Glenna D. (1981) “Young women's transition to marriage.” Demography 18: 681–94.Google Scholar
Wells, Robert V. (1972) “Quaker marriage patterns in a colonial perspective.” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd ser., 29: 415–42.Google Scholar
Wells, Robert V. (1992) “The population of England's colonies in America: Old English or new Americans?” Population Studies 46: 85–102.Google Scholar
Whaples, Robert (1995) “The standard of living among Polish- and Slovak-Americans: Evidence from fraternal insurance records, 1880–1970,” in Komlos, John (ed.) The Biological Standard of Living on Three Continents: Further Explorations in Anthropometric History. Boulder, CO: Westview: 151–71.Google Scholar
Wildsmith, Elizabeth, Gutmann, Myron P., and Gratton, Brian (2003) “Assimilation and intermarriage for U.S. immigrant groups, 1880–1990.” History of the Family 8: 563–84.Google Scholar
Willcox, Walter F. (1899) “Area, population, birthplace, migration, and conjugal condition.” Publications of the American Economic Association, n.s., 2, The Federal Census. Critical Essays by Members of the American Economic Association. New York: Macmillan; London: Sonnenschein: 8–37.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. Anthony , and Schofield, Roger S. (1989[1981]) The Population History of England, 1541–1871. New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wyatt-Brown, Bertram (1982) Southern Honor: Ethics and Behavior in the Old South. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yasuba, Yasukichi (1962) Birth Rates of the White Population in the United States, 1800–1860: An Economic Study. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar