Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T06:20:59.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industrial Profits and Market Forces: The Antebellum South

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Albert W. Niemi Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There have been several important contributions to the recent literature concerned with profits in antebellum southern manufacturing (Bateman et al., 1975; Bateman and Weiss, 1975a, 1975b, 1976, 1981; and Vedder and Gallaway, 1980). Much of what we know about industrial profits during this era stems from the pioneering work of Fred Bateman and Thomas Weiss. In their work, these authors estimate rates of return to manufacturing investment for the South and the nation as a whole. They find that the rates of return in manufacturing were unusually high compared to returns in alternative investments in the decade preceding the Civil War. In fact, their estimates suggest that the financial returns in manufacturing were roughly twice as great as the financial returns to investment in agriculture. With these large sectoral differences in rates of return, Bateman and Weiss question why the South was so slow to industrialize and why the antebellum southern economy continued to be dominated by plantation agriculture.

Type
Comment and Debate
Information
Social Science History , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , Spring 1989 , pp. 89 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bateman, F., Foust, J., and Weiss, T. (1975) “Profitability in southern manufacturing: Estimates for 1860.” Explorations in Economic History 12 (July): 211–231.Google Scholar
Bateman, F. and Weiss, T. (1975a) “Comparative regional development in antebellum manufacturing: Estimates for 1860.” Journal of Economic History 35 (March): 182–208.Google Scholar
Bateman, F. and Weiss, T. (1975b) “Market structure before the age of big business: Concentration and profit in early southern manufacturing.” Business History Review 49 (Autumn): 312–336.Google Scholar
Bateman, F. and Weiss, T. (1976) “Manufacturing in the antebellum South,” in Uselding, Paul J. (ed.) Research in Economic History. Vol. 1, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press: 1–44.Google Scholar
Bateman, F. and Weiss, T. (1981) A Deplorable Scarcity: The Failure of Industrialization in the Slave Economy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Business History Review (1981) “Editor’s corner” (response by Bateman, and Weiss, and the rebuttal by Vedder, and Gallaway, ]. 55 (Spring): 87–91.Google Scholar
Conrad, A. H. and Meyer, J. R. (1958) “The economics of slavery in the antebellum South.” Journal of Political Economy 66 (April): 95–130.Google Scholar
Fogel, R. W. and Engerman, S. L. (1974) Time on the Cross. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fogel, R. W. and Engerman, S. L. (1977) “Explaining the relative efficiency of slave agriculture in the antebellum South.” American Economic Review 67 (June): 275–296.Google Scholar
Foust, J. D. and Swan, D. E. (1970) “Productivity and profitability of antebellum slave labor: A micro approach,” in Parker, William N. (ed.) The Structure of the Cotton Economy of the Antebellum South. Washington: Agricultural History Society: 39–62.Google Scholar
Ransom, R. L. and Sutch, R. (1977) One Kind of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saraydar, E. (1964) “A note on the profitability of antebellum slavery.” Southern Economic Journal 30 (April): 325–332.Google Scholar
Sutch, R. (1965) “The profitability of ante bellům slavery—Revisited.” Southern Economic Journal 31 (April): 365–377.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1864) Eighth Census of the U.S., Agriculture. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1864a) Eighth Census of the U.S., Population. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1865) Eighth Census of the U.S., Manufactures. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1895) Eleventh Census of the U.S. Manufactures, Part 1. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1975) Historical Statistics of the United States. Colonial Times to 1970. Series A, C, and E. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Senate (1858-1859) “Digest of statistics of manufactures in the United States in 1850.” Senate Documents, 35th Cong., 2d Sess., Vol. 10. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vedder, R. K. and Gallaway, L. E. (1980) “The profitability of antebellum manufacturing: Some new estimates.” Business History Review 54 (Spring): 92–103.Google Scholar
Yasuba, V. (1961) “The profitability and viability of plantation slavery in the United States.” Economic Studies Quarterly 12 (September): 60–67.Google Scholar