Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T10:20:15.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industrialization, the Family Economy, and the Economic Status of the American Elderly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Brian Gratton  and
Frances M. Rotondo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his 1911 film What Shall We Do with Our Old? D.W. Griffith dramatized the belief that urban, industrial America had no place for the elderly. Fired for being too slow at his work, an impoverished old man cannot buy food or medicine for his wife, who languishes in their drab, one-room apartment. Justice Benjamin Cardozo told a similar tale in upholding the constitutionality of the Social Security Act (Helvering v. Davis, 301 U.S. 619 [1937]): “The number of [aged] unable to take care of themselves is growing at a threatening pace. More and more our population is becoming urban and industrial instead of rural and agricultural.” Cardozo relied on studies by the U.S. Social Security Board (1937: 3), which found that “the major part of the industrial population . . . earns scarcely enough to provide for its existence. Savings are small and generally cover little more than the cost of burial insurance.” As a result, “industrial workers in [urban] areas . . . reach old age with few resources” (ibid.: 33).

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , Fall 1991 , pp. 337 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binstock, R. H. (1983) “The aged as scapegoat.” Gerontologist 23: 136-43.Google Scholar
Bodnar, J. (1982) Workers’ World: Kinship, Community, and Protest in an Industrial Society, 1900-1940. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bodnar, J. (1985) The Transplanted: A History of Immigrants in Urban America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bodnar, J., Simon, R., and Weber, M. (1982) Lives of Their Own: Blacks, Italians, and Poles in Pittsburgh, 1900-1960. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Bushman, R. L. (1981) “Family security in the transition from farm to city, 1750-1850.” Journal of Family History 6: 238-56.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. S. (1987) “Women’s work, housework, and history: The historical roots of inequality in work-force participation,” in Gerstel, N. and Gross, H. (eds.) Families and Work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 164-77.Google Scholar
Craig, L. A. (1989) “Farm output, productivity, and fertility decline in the antebellum northern United States.” Ph.D. diss., Indiana University.Google Scholar
Dublin, L., Lotka, A., and Spiegelman, M. (1949) Length of Life: A Study of the Life Table. Rev. ed., New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, A. (1928) The Challenge of the Aged. New York: Vanguard.Google Scholar
Folbre, N. (1987) “Family strategy, feminist strategy.” Historical Methods 20: 115-18.Google Scholar
Gabaccia, D. (1988) “The transplanted: Women and family in immigrant America.” Social Science History 12: 247-49.Google Scholar
Goldin, C. (1981) “Family strategies and the family economy in the late nineteenth century: The role of secondary workers,” in Hershberg, T. (ed.) Philadelphia: Work, Space, Family, and Group Experience in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press: 277–310.Google Scholar
Gould, E. R. L. (1893) “The social condition of labor,” in Adams, H. B. (ed.) Labor, Slavery, and Self-Government, vol. 9. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press: 8–42.Google Scholar
Haber, C., and Gratton, B. (in press) A Social History of the American Elderly. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Haines, M. R. (1979) “Industrial work and the family life cycle, 1889-1890.” Research in Economic History 4: 289–356.Google Scholar
Haines, M. R. (1985) “The life cycle, savings, and demographic adaptation: Some historical evidence for the United States and Europe,” in Rossi, A. S. (ed.) Gender and the Life Course. New York: Aldine: 43–64.Google Scholar
Haines, M. R., and Goodman, A.C. (1989) “Buying the American dream: Housing demand in the United States in the late nineteenth century.” NBER Working Paper Series on Historical Factors in Long Run Growth, no. 5. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Haines, M. R. (in press) “‘A home of one’s own’: Aging and homeownership in the United States in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries,” in Kertzer, D. I. and Laslett, P. (eds.) The Historical Demography of Aging. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hall, J. D., Leloudis, J., Korstad, R., Murphy, M., Jones, L. A., and Daly, C. B. (1987) Like a Family. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hareven, T. K. (1982) Family Time and Industrial Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helvering v. Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937).Google Scholar
Historical Methods (1987) “Family strategy: A dialogue.” 20: 113-25.Google Scholar
Homer, S. (1977) A History of Interest Rates. 2d ed., New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Hurd, M. (1989) “The economic status of the elderly.” Science 244: 659-64.Google Scholar
ICPSR (1986a) Cost of Living of Industrial Workers in the United States and Europe, 1889-1890 [machine-readable data set]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
ICPSR (1986b) Cost of Living in the United States, 1917-1919 [machine- readable data set]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Kertzer, D. (1985) “Future directions in historical household studies.” Journal of Family History 10: 98–107.Google Scholar
Kleinberg, S. J. (1976) “Technology and women’s work: The lives of working class women in Pittsburgh, 1870-1900.” Labor History 17: 58–72.Google Scholar
Lamphere, L. (1987) From Working Daughters to Working Mothers: Immigrant Women in a New England Industrial Community. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, R. F. (1976) National Income in the United States: 1799-1938. New York: Arno.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Commission on Pensions (1925) Report on Old-Age Pensions. Boston: Massachusetts Commission on Pensions.Google Scholar
Modell, J., and Hareven, T. K. (1973) “Urbanization and the malleable household: An examination of boarding and lodging in American families.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 35: 467-79.Google Scholar
Morawska, E. (1985) For Bread with Butter: The Life-Worlds of East Central Europeans in Johnston, Pennsylvania, 1900-1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
National Civic Federation (1928) Extent of Old Age Dependency. New York: National Civic Federation.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. L., Smeeding, T., and Jencks, C. (1988) “The uses and limits of income comparison,” in Palmer, J. L., Smeeding, T., and Torrey, B. B. (eds.) The Vulnerable. Washington: Urban Institute Press: 9–27.Google Scholar
Parkerson, D. H., and Parkerson, J. A. (1988) “‘Fewer children of greater spiritual quality’: Religion and the decline of fertility in nineteenth-century America.” Social Science History 12: 49–70.Google Scholar
Pessen, E. (1982) “The beleaguered myth of antebellum egalitarianism.” Social Science History 6: 111-27.Google Scholar
Ransom, R., and Sutch, R. (1988) “The decline of retirement in the years before Social Security: U.S. retirement patterns, 1870-1940,” in Campbell, R. R. and Lazear, E. (eds.) Issues in Contemporary Retirement. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press: 3–37.Google Scholar
Rotella, E., and Alter, G. (1989) “Working class debt in the late nineteenth century.” Indiana University Economic History Workshop, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Rothbart, R. (1989) “‘Homes are what any strike is about’: Immigrant labor and the family wage.” Journal of Social History 23: 267-84.Google Scholar
Rotondo, F. M. (1991) “Work and well-being: The American elderly in the industrial era.” M.A. thesis, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Soltow, L. (1975) Men and Wealth in the United States, 1850-1870. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sorensen, A., and McLanahan, S. (1989) “Women’s economic dependency and men’s support obligations: Economic relations within households.” Working Paper no. 89-26. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Center for Demography and Ecology.Google Scholar
Stern, M. J. (1987) Society and Family Strategy: Erie County, New York, 1850-1920. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (1924) “Cost of living in the United States.” Bulletin no. 357. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (n.d.) “Cost of living, 1918: Instructions to interviewers” Ibound with ICPSR 1986b].Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1922) Fourteenth Census of the United States. Vol. 3, Population: 1920. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1923) Abstract of the Fourteenth Census of the United States: 1920. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1975) Historical Statistics of the United States, pt. 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Office (1896) Abstract of the Eleventh Census: 1890. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Social Security Board (1937) Economic Insecurity in Old Age. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Ware, C. F. (c. 1931) “Greenwich village study: Handling family funds.” Papers, Boxes 51-55. Franklin Delano Roosevelt Library, Hyde Park, NY.Google Scholar
Zelizer, V. (1985) Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar