Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T20:46:19.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Quality of Census Data for Historical Inquiry: A Research Agenda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Richard H. Steckel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Quantitative historians who mine diverse sources of evidence usually fret over the quality of their raw materials. Most papers that introduce new sources of data attempt to explain who originally collected the evidence, why it was collected, and how the actual use of the data may differ from the original intentions. These discussions often include estimates of omissions or biases in the records and may explain the sensitivity of results to underlying assumptions.

With a few notable exceptions, scholars have given surprisingly little attention to the quality of census data (see Ginsberg 1988; Furstenberg et al. 1979; Sharpless and Shortridge 1975). This neglect is remarkable in view of the public debate over the accuracy of the modern censuses, the conventions of scholarly scrutiny that apply to other types of records, and the widespread use made of census documents by nearly all disciplinary approaches to study of the past. Stimulated in part by the declining costs of entering and managing large databases, historians have intensively used the manuscript schedules of population for the nineteenth century, and numerous projects were recently completed or are planned for those of the early twentieth century (e.g., Ruggles and Menard 1990). Researchers have also made considerable use of additional schedules collected by the U.S. census beginning in the mid-nineteenth century, including those for slaves, manufacturing, and agriculture.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , Winter 1991 , pp. 579 - 599
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, John W., and Kasakoff, Alice (1989) “Estimates of census underenumeration based on genealogies.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Social Science History Association, Washington, DC, 18 November.Google Scholar
Alter, George, Goldin, Claudia, and Rotella, Elyce (1991) “Motives for saving in the nineteenth century: Data from the Philadelphia Saving Fund society at mid-century.” Mimeo, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Alterman, Hyman (1969) Counting People: The Census in History. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
American Economic Association (1899) “The federal census: Critical essays.” Publications of the American Economic Association 2: 1–515.Google Scholar
Anderson, Margo J. (1988) The American Census: A Social History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, Bateman, Fred, and Weiss, Thomas (1979) “An evaluation of nineteenth-century censuses as sources of economic statistics.” Paper presented at the annual Cliometrics Conference, Chicago, 8 June.Google Scholar
Bogue, Donald J., and Murphy, Edmund M. (1964) “The effect of classification errors upon statistical inference: A case analysis with census data.” Demography 1: 42–55.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean (1986) “Those high nineteenth-century American voting turnouts: Fact or fiction?” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 16: 613-44.Google Scholar
Capen, Nahum, and Chickering, Jesse (1849) “Letters addressed to the Hon. John Davis, concerning the census of 1849.” 30th Cong., 2d sess. S. Misc. Doc. 64.Google Scholar
Cassedy, James H. (1969) Demography in Early America: Beginnings of the Statistical Mind, 1600-1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chudacoff, Howard P. (1972) Mobile Americans: Residential and Social Mobility in Omaha, 1880-1920. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansley J. (1955) “The population of the United States in 1950 classified by age, sex, and color—A revision of census figures.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 55: 16–54.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansley J., and Zelnik, Melvin (1963) New Estimates of Fertility and Population in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Patricia Cline (1982) A Calculating People. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Condran, Gretchen A., and Crimmins, Eileen (1979) “A description and evaluation of mortality data in the federal census: 1850-1900.” Historical Methods 12: 1–23.Google Scholar
Cummings, John (1914) “The permanent census bureau: A decade of work.” Publications of the American Statistical Association 13: 605-38.Google Scholar
Davenport, David P. (1985) “Duration of residence in the 1855 census of New York state.” Historical Methods 18: 5–12.Google Scholar
DeBats, Donald A. (1989) “Hide and seek: The historian and nineteenth-century social accounting.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Social Science History Association, Washington, DC, 18 November.Google Scholar
DeBow, J. D. B. (1854) A Statistical View of the United States. Washington, DC: A. O. P. Nicholson.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Albeit (1944) “The first U.S. census of the insane (1840) and its use as pro-slavery propaganda.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 15: 469-82.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A. (1961) “Regional income trends, 1840-1950,” in Harris, Seymour (ed.) American Economic History. New York: McGraw-Hill: 525-47.Google Scholar
Eckler, A. Ross (1972) The Bureau of the Census. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Fay, Robert E., Passel, Jeffrey S., and Robinson, J. Gregory (1988) “The coverage of population in the 1980 census.” Evaluation and Research Reports, 1980 Census of Population and Housing, PHC80-E4. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
Fein, David J. (1990) “Racial and ethnic differences in U.S. census omission rates.” Demography 27: 285–302.Google Scholar
Ferleger, Lou A. (1991) “Tools and time: Southern farmers after Reconstruction.” Mimeo, Boston.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert W. (1991) “New sources and new techniques for the study of secular trends in nutritional status, health, mortality, and the process of aging.” Working Paper on Historical Factors in Long Run Growth no. 26. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, Frank F. Jr., Strong, Douglas, and Crawford, Albert G. (1979) “What happened when the census was redone: An analysis of the recount of 1870 in Philadelphia.” Sociology and Social Research 63: 475–505.Google Scholar
Gallman, Robert E. (1966) “Gross national product in the United States, 1834-1909,” in Conference on Research in Income and Wealth (ed.) Output, Employment, and Productivity in the United States after 1800. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research: 3–90.Google Scholar
Gannett, Henry (1881) “The alleged census frauds in the South.” International Review 10: 459-67.Google Scholar
Gannett, Henry (1895) “Was the count of population in 1890 reasonably correct?” Publications of the American Statistical Association 4: 99–102.Google Scholar
Garfield, James A. (1870) “The American census.” Journal of Social Science 2: 31–55.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Caren A. (1988) “Estimates and correlates of enumeration completeness: Censuses and maps in nineteenth-century Massachusetts.” Social Science History 12: 71–86.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Gerald (1986) “Computing antebellum turnout: Methods and models.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 16: 579–611.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia (1989) Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heer, David M., ed. (1968) Social Statistics and the City. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Urban Studies.Google Scholar
Hershberg, Theodore, Burstein, Alan N., Ericksen, Eugene P., Greenberg, Stephanie W., and Yancey, William L. (1981) “A tale of three cities: Blacks, immigrants, and opportunity in Philadelphia, 1850-1880,” in Hershberg, Theodore (ed.) Philadelphia: Work, Space, Family, and Group Experience in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press: 461-91.Google Scholar
Holt, W. Stuli (1929) The Bureau of the Census: Its History, Activities, and Organization. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hunt, William C. (1897) “The scope and method of the federal census.” Publications of the American Economic Association 1: 466-94.Google Scholar
Jarvis, Edward, Brigham, William, and Thornton, J. Wingate (1844) “Memorial of the American Statistical Association praying the adoption of measures for the correction of errors in the returns of the sixth census.” 28th Cong., 2d sess. S. Misc. Doc. 5.Google Scholar
Jentz, John B. (1982) “A note on evaluating the error in the Guilded Age manufacturing census: The problem of the hand trades.” Historical Methods 15: 79–81.Google Scholar
Johnston, Denis F., and Wetzel, James R. (1969) “Effect of the census undercount on labor force estimates.” Monthly Labor Review 92: 3–13.Google Scholar
Knights, Peter (1969) “A method for estimating census underenumeration.” Historical Methods Newsletter 3: 5–8.Google Scholar
Knights, Peter (1971) “Accuracy of age reporting in the manuscript federal censuses of 1850 and 1860.” Historical Methods Newsletter 4: 79–83.Google Scholar
Knights, Peter (1987) Personal communication, 9 April.Google Scholar
Lebergott, Stanley (1964) Manpower in Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lee, Everett S., Miller, Ann Ratner, Brainerd, Carl P., and Easterlin, Richard A. (1957) Population Redistribution and Economic Growth, United States, 1870-1950, vol. 1. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Miller, Andrew T. (1991) “Measuring mulattoes: The changing U.S. racial regime in census and society.” Mimeo, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Miller, Kelly (1922) “Enumeration errors in Negro population.” Scientific Monthly 14: 168-77.Google Scholar
Murray, John E. (1990) “The economic life of Shakers: Living standards, membership patterns, and the wordly economy.” Mimeo, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Myers, Robert J. (1940) “Errors and bias in the reporting of ages in census data.” Actuarial Society of America Transactions 41: 395–415.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1972) America’s Uncounted People: Report of the Advisory Committee on Problems of Census Enumeration. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Olmsted, Frederick L. (1856) A Journey in the Seaboard Slave States. New York: Dix and Edwards.Google Scholar
Palmer, Edgar Z. (1951) “The correctness of the 1890 census of population for Nebraska cities.” Nebraska History 32: 259-67.Google Scholar
Powers, L.G. (1912) “Degree of accuracy in census statistics of agriculture.” Publications of the American Statistical Association 12: 460-65.Google Scholar
Preston, Samuel, and Haines, Michael (1990) Fatal Years: Child Mortality in Late Nineteenth-Century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Daniel O. (1947) “A check on underenumeration in the 1940 census.” American Sociological Review 12: 44–49.Google Scholar
Richardson, James D. (1896-99) A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents, 1789-1897. 10 vols., Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, and Menard, Russell R. (1990) “A public use sample of the 1880 U.S. census of population.” Historical Methods 23: 104-15.Google Scholar
Scott, Ann Herbert (1968) Census U.S.A.: Fact Finding for the American People, 1790-1970. New York: Seabury.Google Scholar
Sharpless, John B., and Shortridge, Ray M. (1975) “Biased underenumeration in census manuscripts: Methodological implications.” Journal of Urban History 1:409-40.Google Scholar
Shryock, Henry S., Siegel, Jacob S., et al. (1975) The Methods and Materials of Demography. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jacob S., and Zelnik, Melvin (1968) “An evaluation of coverage in the 1960 census of population by techniques of demographic analysis and by composite methods,” in American Statistical Association, Social Statistics Section (ed.) Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section: 1966. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association: 71–85.Google Scholar
Soltow, Lee (1990) “Shares of lower-income groups: Indicators of their magnitudes for the United States, 1790-1875.” Paper presented at the Conference on the Standard of Living in Early Nineteenth-Century America, Cambridge, MA, 21 July.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard H. (1988) “Census matching and migration: A research strategy.” Historical Methods 21: 52–60.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard H. (1989) “Household migration and rural settlement in the United States, 1850-1860.” Explorations in Economic History 26: 190–218.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard H. (1990) “Poverty and prosperity: A longitudinal study of wealth accumu lation, 1850-1860.” Review of Economics and Statistics 72: 275-85.Google Scholar
Thernstrom, Stephan (1973) The Other Bostonians: Poverty and Progress in the American Metropolis, 1880-1970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations (1955) Methods of Appraisal of Quality of Basic Data for Population Estimates. Population Studies, no. 23. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Office (1872) Statistics of the Population of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce (1954) Appraisal of Census Programs: Report of the Intensive Review Committee to the Secretary of Commerce. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce (1980) Conference on Census Undercount. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov ernment Printing Office.Google Scholar
Walker, Francis A. (1878) “Interview of the select committees of the Senate of the United States and of the House of Representatives to make provision for taking the tenth census.” 45th Cong., 2d sess. S. Misc. Doc. 26.Google Scholar
Walker, Francis A. (1890) “Statistics of the colored race in the United States.” Publications of the American Statistical Association 2: 91–106.Google Scholar
Walsh, Margaret (1970a) “The census as an accurate source of information: The value of mid-nineteenth-century manufacturing returns.” Historical Methods Newsletter 4: 3–13.Google Scholar
Walsh, Margaret (1970b) “The value of mid-nineteenth-century manufacturing returns: The printed census and the manuscript census compilations compared.” Historical Methods Newsletter 4: 43–51.Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas (1990) “U.S. labor force estimates, 1800 to 1860.” Paper presented at the Conference on the Standard of Living in Early Nineteenth-Century America, Cambridge, MA, 20 July.Google Scholar
Winkle, Kenneth J. (1989) “The U.S. census as a source in political history.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Social Science History Association, Washington, DC, 18 November.Google Scholar
Wooster, Ralph A. (1969) The People in Power: Courthouse and Statehouse in the Lower South, 1850-1860. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Wooster, Ralph A. (1975) Politicians, Planters, and Plain Folk: Courthouse and Statehouse in the Upper South, 1850-1860. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Carroll D. (1887) “Problems of the census.” Journal of Social Science 23: 1–20.Google Scholar
Wright, Carroll D. (1900) The History and Growth of the United States Census. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Yasuba, Yasukichi (1962) Birth Rates of the White Population in the United States, 1800-1860. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Allyn A. (1901) “The enumeration of children.” Publications of the American Statistical Association 7: 227-54.Google Scholar
Zelnik, Melvin (1965) “An evaluation of new estimates of the Negro population.” Demography 2: 630-39.Google Scholar