Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:38:45.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classificatory Struggles in the Nonprofit Sector

The Formation of the National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities, 1969–1987

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Emily Barman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Employing Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of classificatory struggles and sociological literature on professions’ construction of jurisdiction, this article examines the origins of the National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities (NTEE), the dominant classification system for the US nonprofit sector. Using data drawn from archival research and secondary research, I show that the establishment of the NTEE was part of a larger symbolic struggle over the proper classification of charitable foundations. Philanthropic elites and new nonprofit scholars responded to government threats to foundations by integrating them into the newly created “nonprofit sector,” whose societal value—both philanthropic and economic—would be demonstrated through research on this sector. The NTEE was formed by nonprofit researchers to generate valid data that demonstrated the nonprofit sector’s multiple contributions to society’s well-being. Using a theoretical approach, this article extends Bourdieu’s emphasis on classificatory struggles beyond the study of the construction of the characteristics of social classes to explore contestations over the proper taxonomy of organizations and sectors in society.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , Spring 2013 , pp. 103 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew (1988) A System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ajzenstadt, Mimi (2002) “Crime, social control, and the process of social classification: Juvenile delinquency/justice discourse in Israel, 1948–1970.” Social Problems 49 (4): 585–604.Google Scholar
American Association of Fundraising Counsel (1956) Giving USA. New York: American Association of Fundraising Counsel.Google Scholar
Andrews, F. Emerson (1950) Philanthropic Giving. Los Angeles: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Bailey, Stanley R. (2008) “Unmixing for race making in Brazil.” American Journal of Sociology 114 (3): 577–614.Google Scholar
Barry, John W.Manno, Bruno V., eds. (1987) Giving Better, Giving Smarter: Working Papers of the National Commission of Philanthropy. Washington, DC: Hudson Institute.Google Scholar
Beemer, Jeffrey K. (2009) “Diagnostic prescriptions shifting boundaries in nineteenth-century disease and cause-of-death classification.” Social Science History 33 (3): 307–40.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel (1976) The Coming of Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, RinkuTinkelman, Daniel (2009) “How tough are better business bureau/wise giving alliance financial standards?” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39 (3): 467–89.Google Scholar
Block, Fred R. (1987) “The academic discipline of nonprofit organization management: Past, present, and future.” PhD diss., University of Colorado, Denver.Google Scholar
Bode, Jerry G. (1972) “The voluntary association concept in twentieth century American sociology,” in Smith, David HortonReddy, Richard D.Baldwin, Burt R. (eds.) Voluntary Action Research: 1972. Lexington, MA: Lexington: 51–69.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1985) “The social space and the genesis of groups.” Theory and Society 14 (6): 723–44.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1989) “Social space and symbolic power.” Sociological Theory 7 (1): 14–25.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1991) Language and Symbolic Power, ed. Thompson, John B.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1998) Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action, trans. Johnson, Randal et al. . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, PierreBoltanski, Luc (1981) “The educational system and the economy: Titles and jobs,” in Lemert, Charles C. (ed.) French Sociology: Rupture and Renewal since 1968. New York: Columbia University Press: 141–51.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, PierreWacquant, Loïc J. D. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, PierreWacquant, Loïc J. D.Farage, Samar (1994) “Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field.” Sociological Theory 12 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Bowker, GeoffreyStar, Susan L. (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bremner, Robert H. (1988) American Philanthropy, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brilliant, Eleanor (2000) Private Charity and Public Inquiry: A History of the Filer and Peterson Commissions. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Colin (2001) “Nonprofit history’s new numbers (and the need for more).” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30 (2): 174–203.Google Scholar
Casalino, Lawrence P. (2004) “Unfamiliar tasks, contested jurisdictions: The Changing organization field of medical practice in the United States.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 45 (supp.): 59–75.Google Scholar
Clarke, Adele E.Casper, Monica J. (1996) “From simple technology to complex arena: Classification of pap smears, 1917–90.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 10 (4): 601–23.Google Scholar
Coalition for the Public Good Thru Voluntary Initiative (1974) Statement prepared for the Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs. Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs Records (1964–80), Ruth Lilly Special Collections and Archives, IUPUI University Library, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs (1964–80) Ruth Lilly Special Collections and Archives, IUPUI University Library, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs (1975) Giving in America: Toward a Stronger Voluntary Sphere. Washington, DC: Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs.Google Scholar
Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs (1977) Research Papers. Washington, DC: US Department of the Treasury.Google Scholar
Corry, Olaf (2010) “Defining and theorizing the third sector,” in Taylor, Rupert (ed.) Third Sector Research. New York: Springer: 11–20.Google Scholar
Curti, Merle (1957) “The history of American philanthropy as a field of research.” American Historical Review 62 (2): 352–63.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Frank G. (1970) The Changing Position of Philanthropy in the American Economy. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. (1986) “Classification in art.” American Sociological Review 52 (4): 440–55.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. (1997) “Culture and cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology 23: 263–87.Google Scholar
Donee Group (1978) Private Philanthropy: Vital and Innovative? or Passive and Irrelevant? The Donee Group Report and Recommendations. Washington, DC: National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary (1986) How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, MaryHull, David, eds. (1992) How Classification Works. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile (2008 [1912]) Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, ÉmileMauss, Marcel (1963 [1903]) Primitive Classification. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa (1996) “Useful Durkheim.” Sociological Theory 14 (2): 109–30.Google Scholar
Espeland, WendySauder, Michael (2007) “Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (1): 1–40.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai (1973) “The third sector and domestic missions.” Public Administration Review 33 (4): 314–27.Google Scholar
Fields, Anne M.Connell, Tschera Harkness (2004) “Classification and the definition of a discipline: The Dewey decimal classification and home economics.” Libraries and Culture 39 (3): 245–59.Google Scholar
Finlay, William (1990) “Hoarding and fragmenting: The politics of job classification in two work settings.” Sociological Quarterly 31 (3): 389–402.Google Scholar
Fischer, Robert L.Wilsker, AmandaYoung, Dennis R. (2011) “Exploring the revenue mix of nonprofit organizations: Does it relate to publicness?” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40 (4): 662–81.Google Scholar
Fosdick, Raymond Blaine (1952) The Story of the Rockefeller Foundation. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1970) The Order of Things. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Freidson, Eliot (1970) Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Freidson, Eliot (1986) Professional Powers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Froelich, KarenKnoepfle, Terry W. (1996) “Internal Revenue Service 990 data: Fact or fiction?” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 25 (1): 40–52.Google Scholar
Frumkin, Peter (1999) “Private foundations as public institutions: Regulation, professionalization, and the redefinition of organized philanthropy,” in Lagemann, Ellen Condliffe (ed.) Philanthropic Foundations: New Possibilities, New Scholarship. Bloomington: Indiana University Press: 69–98.Google Scholar
Frumkin, Peter (2002) On Being Nonprofit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Sylvia (2003) “Creating and contesting boundaries: Exploring the dynamics of conflict and classification.” Sociological Forum 18 (1): 3–30.Google Scholar
Ginzberg, EliHiestand, Dale L.Reubens, Beatrice G. (1965) The Pluralistic Economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Goebel, Thomas (1994) “Professionalization and state building: The state and the professions in Illinois, 1870–1920.” Social Science History 18 (2): 309–37.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Chad (2005) “Contesting the status of relief workers during the New Deal: The Workers Alliance of America and the Works Progress Administration, 1935–1941.” Social Science History 29 (3): 337–71.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. WayneBabchuk, Nicholas (1959) “A typology of voluntary associations.” American Sociological Review 24 (1): 22–29.Google Scholar
Grønbjerg, Kirsten A. (1994) “Using NTEE to classify non-profit organizations: An assessment of human service and regional applications.” Voluntas 5 (3): 301–28.Google Scholar
Grønbjerg, Kirsten A.Liu, Helen K.Pollack, Thomas H. (2010) “Incorporated but not IRS-registered: Exploring the (dark) grey fringes of the nonprofit universe.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39 (5): 925–45.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter D. (1987) “A historical overview of the private nonprofit sector,” in Powell, Walter W. (ed.) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press: 32–65.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter D. (1992) Inventing the Nonprofit Sector. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter D. (1995) “Theories and institutions.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 24 (1): 5–13.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter D. (1999) “The work of many hands: A response to Stanley N. Katz on the origins of the ‘serious study’ of philanthropy.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28 (4): 522–34.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter D.Burke, Colin B. (2002) “Historical statistics of the US chapter on voluntary, nonprofit, and religious entities and activities: Underlying concepts, concerns, and opportunities.” Working Paper no. 14, Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations and Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Hammack, David C. (2002) “Nonprofit organizations in American history: Research opportunities and sources.” American Behavioral Scientist 45 (11): 1638–74.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry (1987) “Economic theories of the nonprofit sector,” in Powell, Walter W. (ed.) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press: 27–42.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, Virginia A. (1985) “Positioning ourselves as a sector: Research and public policy.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 14 (2–3): 17–24.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, Virginia A. (1987) “Research on the independent sector: A progress report,” www.paytonpapers.org/output/pdf/0028.pdf.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, Virginia A. (1990) “Mapping the non-profit sector in the United States: Implications for research.” Voluntas 1 (2): 6–32.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, Virginia A.Boris, Elizabeth T. (1990) “Useful data bases for practitioners and scholars of nonprofit management.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 1 (1): 79–85.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, Virginia A.Toppe, Christopher (1991) “A new research and planning tool for managers: The National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 1 (4): 403–14.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, Virginia A.Weitzman, Murray (1984) Dimensions of the Independent Sector: A Statistical Profile. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, Virginia A.Weitzman, Murray (1993) “Measuring the nonprofit sector in the US economy: Conceptual framework and methodology.” Voluntas 4 (2): 141–62.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, Virginia A.Weitzman, Murray (1994) “Measuring the US nonprofit sector: A progress report.” Voluntas 4 (4): 519–29.Google Scholar
Independent Sector (1980) Minutes, Board of Directors. Independent Sector Records, Ruth Lilly Special Collections and Archives, IUPUI University Library, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Independent Sector (1983) Minutes, Board of Directors, September 21. Independent Sector Records, Ruth Lilly Special Collections and Archives, IUPUI University Library, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Independent Sector Records (1971–96) Ruth Lilly Special Collections and Archives, IUPUI University Library, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Internal Revenue Service (2011) “Tax-exempt status for your organization,” www.irs.gov/Charities-&-Non-Profits/Other-Tax-Exempt-Organizations (accessed November 6, 2012).Google Scholar
Internal Revenue Service (2012) “Tax information for charities and other non-profits,” www.irs.gov/charities/index.html (accessed January 5, 2012).Google Scholar
Jones, John Price, ed. (1942) The Yearbook of Philanthropy, 1941–1942. New York: Inter-River.Google Scholar
Kahn, Richard D. (1970) “Regulation of privately supported foundations: Some anomalies.” Indiana Legal Forum 4 (1): 271–304.Google Scholar
Karl, Barry (1987) “Nonprofit institutions.” Science (236): 984–85.Google Scholar
Karl, Barry (1999) “Going for broke: The historian’s commitment to philanthropy,” in Lagemann, Ellen Condliffe (ed.) Philanthropic Foundations: New Scholarship, New Possibilities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press: 287–95.Google Scholar
Karl, BarryKatz, Stanley N. (1981) “The American private philanthropic foundation and the public sphere, 1890–1930.” Minerva 19 (2): 236–70.Google Scholar
Katz, Stanley N. (1999) “Where did the serious study of philanthropy come from, anyway?” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28 (1): 74–82.Google Scholar
Kendall, JeremyKnapp, Martin (1995) “A loose and baggy monster: Boundaries, definitions, and typologies,” in Smith, Justin DavisRochester, ColinHedley, Rodney (eds.) An Introduction to the Voluntary Sector. London: Routledge: 65–94.Google Scholar
Klutznick, Philip M. (1974) Letter to Pifer, Alan, President, Carnegie Corporation of New York, including summary of luncheon hosted by Filer, John H. on May 15. Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs Records (1964–80), Ruth Lilly Special Collections and Archives, IUPUI University Library, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Kohler, Robert E. (2008) “Plants and pigeonholes: Classification as a practice in American ecology.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 38 (1): 77–108.Google Scholar
Kramer, Ralph (1981) Voluntary Agencies in the Welfare State. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lamont, MicheleMolnár, Virag (2002) “The study of boundaries in the social sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167–95.Google Scholar
Lamont, MicheleThévenot, Laurent, eds. (2000) Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lampkin, Linda M.Boris, Elizabeth T. (2002) “Nonprofit organization data: What we have and what we need.” American Behavioral Scientist 45 (11): 1675–1715.Google Scholar
Leete, Laura (2006) “Work in the nonprofit sector,” in Powell, Walter W.Steinberg, Richard (eds.) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press: 159–79.Google Scholar
Levitt, Theodore (1973) The Third Sector. New York: American Management Association.Google Scholar
Loveman, Mara (2007) “The U.S. census and the contested rules of racial classification in early twentieth-century Puerto Rico.” Caribbean Studies 35 (2): 79–114.Google Scholar
McCully, George (2008) Philanthropy Reconsidered. Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse.Google Scholar
McGill, Michael E.Wooten, Leland M. (1975) “Management in the third sector.” Public Administration Review 35 (5): 444–55.Google Scholar
Mirabella, Roseanne M. (2007) “University-based educational programs in nonprofit management and philanthropic studies: A ten-year review and projections of future trends.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 36 (4): 11S–27S.Google Scholar
Muukkonen, Martti (2009) “Framing the field: Civil society and related concepts.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 38 (4): 684–700.Google Scholar
Najam, Adil (1996) “Understanding the third sector: Revisiting the prince, the merchant, and the citizen.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 7 (2): 203–19.Google Scholar
National Center for Charitable Statistics (1982) Minutes, Board of Directors, January 7. Independent Sector Files, Ruth Lilly Special Collections and Archives, IUPUI University Library, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
National Center for Charitable Statistics (1985) Executive director’s progress report. Independent Sector Files, Ruth Lilly Special Collections and Archives, IUPUI University Library, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
National Center for Charitable Statistics (2012a) “Classification tools,” nccs.urban.org/classification/tools.cfm (accessed January 16, 2012).Google Scholar
National Center for Charitable Statistics (2012b) National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities, nccs.urban.org/classification/NTEE.cfm (accessed January 12, 2012).Google Scholar
National Center for Charitable Statistics (2012c) “What are IRS activity codes?,” nccsdataweb.urban.org/knowledgebase/detail.php?linkID=785&category=120&xrefID=2956 (accessed January 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Nielsen, Waldemar A. (1977) The Big Foundations. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
Ortman, Andreas (1999) “Review.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28 (2): 213–34.Google Scholar
Palisi, Bartolomeo J. (1968) “A critical analysis of the voluntary association concept.” Sociology and Social Research 52 (4): 329–405.Google Scholar
Powell, Justin J. W. (2010) “Change in disability classification: Redrawing categorical boundaries in special education in the United States and Germany, 1920–2005.” Comparative Sociology 9 (2): 241–67.Google Scholar
Prewitt, Kenneth (2006) “Foundations,” in Powell, Walter W.Steinberg, Richard (eds.) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press: 355–77.Google Scholar
Research Committee, Filer Commission (1974) Meetings, February 18. Box M5524, Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs Records (1964–80), Ruth Lilly Special Collections and Archives, IUPUI University Library, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Reuter, Shelley Z. (2007) Narrating Social Order: Agoraphobia and the Politics of Classification. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Spencer (1980) “Charity groups’ secrecy criticized.” Washington Post, June 5.Google Scholar
Riecker, John E. (1964) “Foundations and the Patman Report Committee.” Michigan Law Review 63 (1): 95–140.Google Scholar
Roth, Wolff-Michael (2005) “Making classifications (at) work: Ordering practices in science.” Social Studies of Science 35 (4): 581–621.Google Scholar
Rudney, GabrielWeitzman, Murray (1983) Significance of Employment and Earnings in the Philanthropic Sector, 1972–1982. New Haven, CT: Institute for Social Policy Studies, Program on Nonprofit Organizations, Yale University.Google Scholar
Russell Sage Foundation (1956) Report of the Princeton Conference on the History of Philanthropy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Salamon, Lester M. (1993) “The nonprofit almanac: What are the issues?” Voluntas 4 (2): 163–72.Google Scholar
Salamon, Lester M.Anheier, Helmut K. (1992) “In search of the non-profit sector I: The question of definitions.” Voluntas 3 (2): 125–52.Google Scholar
Salamon, Lester M.Anheier, Helmut K. (1996) “The international classification of nonprofit organizations: ICNPO-Revision I, 1996.” Working Paper no. 19. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Salamon, Lester M.Dewees, Sarah (2002) “In search of the nonprofit sector: Improving the state of the art.” American Behavioral Scientist 45 (11): 1716–40.Google Scholar
Seeley, John W.Junker, Buford H.Jones, R. Wallace (1989 [1957]) Community Chest. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Seltzer, WilliamAnderson, Margo (2001) “The dark side of numbers: The role of population data systems in human rights abuses.” Social Research 68 (2): 481–513.Google Scholar
Silvergleid, Jordan E. (2003) “Effects of watchdog organizations on the social capital market.” New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising (41): 7–26.Google Scholar
Simon, John (1995) “The regulation of American foundations: Looking backward at the 1969 Tax Reform Act.” Voluntas 6 (3): 243–54.Google Scholar
Slater, Courtenay M.David, Martin H. (1993) “The not-for-profit sector of the economy: Measurement and presentation in federal statistics.” Voluntas 4 (4): 419–44.Google Scholar
Smith, Bradford (1992) “The use of standard industrial classification codes (SIC) to classify the activities of nonprofit, tax-exempt organizations.” Working Paper no. 19. San Francisco: Institute for Nonprofit Organization Management.Google Scholar
Smith, David Horton (1973) “Dimensions and categories of voluntary organizations/NGOs.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 2 (2): 116–20.Google Scholar
Smith, David Horton (1997) “The rest of the nonprofit sector: Grassroots associations as the dark matter ignored in prevailing ‘flat earth’ maps of the sector.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 26 (2): 114–31.Google Scholar
Smith, David Horton (2003) “A history of ARNOVA.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 32 (3): 458–72.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven RathgebLipsky, Michael (1993) Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sumariwalla, Russy D. (1983) “Preliminary observations on scope, size, and classification of the sector since the Filer Commission.” Working Papers for Spring Research Forum: Since the Filer Commission. New York: Independent Sector.Google Scholar
Sumariwalla, Russy D. (1986) “Toward a national taxonomy of exempt entities.” Washington, DC: Aspen Institute and United Way of America.Google Scholar
Svenden, Gunnar L. H. (2006) “Studying social capital in situ: A qualitative approach.” Theory and Society 35 (1): 39–70.Google Scholar
Swartz, David (1997) Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Szreter, Simon R. S. (1984) “The genesis of the registrar-general’s social classification of occupations.” British Journal of Sociology 35 (4): 522–46.Google Scholar
Tideman, T. Nicholas (1977) “Employment and earnings in the nonprofit charitable sector,” in Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs (ed.) Research Papers, vol. 1. Washington, DC: US Department of the Treasury: 325–31.Google Scholar
Turner, SarahNygren, Thomas I.Bowen, William G. (1993) “The NTEE classification system: Tests of reliability/validity in the field of higher education.” Voluntas 4 (1): 73–94.Google Scholar
Urban Institute (2011) The Nonprofit Sector in Brief: Public Charities, Giving, and Volunteering, 2011. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
US Bureau of the Census (1949) Historical Statistics of the United States. Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
US Department of the Treasury (1965) Report on Private Foundations: Printed for the Use of the House Committee on Ways and Means, February 2, 1965. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc J. D. (1992) “Toward a social praxaelogy: The structure and logic of Bourdieu’s sociology,” in Bourdieu, PierreWacquant, Loïc J. D. (eds.) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 1–60.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, Homer C. (1975) “Private foundations and the Tax Reform Act of 1969.” Law and Contemporary Problems 39 (4): 255–62.Google Scholar
Warriner, CharlesPrather, Jane Emery (1965) “Four types of voluntary associations.” Sociological Inquiry 35 (2): 138–48.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, Burton (1990) “Dimensions of the independent sector.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 1 (2): 191–94.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, BurtonLong, Stephen H. (1977) “The size of the voluntary nonprofit sector: Concepts and measures,” in Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs (ed.) Research Papers, vol. 1. Washington, DC: US Department of the Treasury: 264–75.Google Scholar
Ylvisaker, Paul N. (1987) “Foundations and nonprofit organizations,” in Powell, Walter W. (ed.) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press: 360–77.Google Scholar
Zhao, Wei (2005) “Understanding classifications: Empirical evidence from the American and French wine industries.” Poetics 33 (3–4): 179–200.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Fred (1969) “Changing the rules: Many in Congress ready to tax all foundations, curb their operations.” Wall Street Journal, February 28.Google Scholar
Zunz, Olivier (2011) Philanthropy in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar