Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T15:04:37.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Strangeness in the Production and Reception of Social Scientific Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2023

Christian Dayé Open the ORCID record for Christian Dayé [Opens in a new window]
Christian Dayé*
Affiliation:
Science, Technology, and Society (STS) Unit, Institute of Interactive Systems and Data Science, Graz, Austria
*
Email: christian.daye@tugraz.at
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium
Information
Social Science History , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , Spring 2024 , pp. 154 - 157
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Social Science History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adalet, Begüm (2021) “Transnational constructions of social scientific personae during the Cold War: The case of comparative politics,” in Solovey, Mark and Dayé, Christian (eds.) Cold War Social Science: Transnational Entanglements. Cham, CH: Palgrave Macmillan: 315–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston (1984) The New Scientific Spirit, trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston (2002) The Formation of the Scientific Mind. A Contribution to a Psychoanalysis of Objective Knowledge, trans. Mary McAllester Jones. Manchester: Clinamen.Google Scholar
Bortolini, Matteo (2021) “The grudging modernizer: A trip to the Middle East and Cold War social science.” Minerva (59): 261–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Chamboredon, Jean-Claude, and Passeron, Jean-Claude (1991) The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries, Krais, Beate (ed.) trans. Richard Nice. New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, James, and Marcus, eds., George E. (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dayé, Christian (2019) “Die Blindheit der Auguren: Delphi, political gaming und das Phänomen der wechselseitigen Nichtbeachtung,” in Dörk, Uwe and Link, Fabian (eds.) Geschichte der Sozialwissenschaften im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert: Idiome - Praktiken - Strukturen. Sozialwissenschaftliche Schriften. Vol. 51. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot: 265–86.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1988) Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul (2007 [1977]) Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg (1971) On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings. Edited by Donald, N. Levine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George (2023) The Colonial Origins of Social Thought: French Sociology and the Overseas Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. (1992) “The ethnographer’s magic: Fieldwork in British Anthropology from Tylor to Malinowski,” in Stocking, George W. (ed.) The Ethnographer’s Magic and Other Essays in the History of Anthropology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press: 12–59.Google Scholar
Wolff, Kurt H., ed. (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glenco, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar