Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T09:23:15.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mobilization and Partisan Division: Open Voting in Fredericia, Denmark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Jørgen Elklit
Jørgen Elklit*
Affiliation:
University of Aarhus, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent articles Bourke and DeBats (1978, 1980) have made a number of interesting points, which are of immediate concern to the study of electoral mobilization and participation over time. They have pointed to the existence of a number of poll lists recording individual votes after 1820 in what they term viva voce states (1980:232ff). These lists certainly must attract the attention of anybody concerned with the empirical study of political development in the United States and elsewhere in the nineteenth century. Some of these lists have been known for quite a while, and some of them have also been used in various studies mentioned by Bourke and DeBats. Nevertheless, much tedious work remains to be done before all of these poll lists can be utilized and before they can be made available to the scientific community.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , Summer 1983 , pp. 235 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1983 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is a slightly revised version of a paper presentedat the 1981 Social Science History Association meeting in Nashville, Tennessee. I wish to thank Ole Tonsgaardfor valuable comments on the original paper.

References

Aldrich, J. and Cnudde, C. F. (1975) “Probing the bounds of conventional wisdom: a comparison of regression, profit, and discriminant analysis.” Amer. J. of Pol. Science 19: 571–608.Google Scholar
Bourke, P. and DeBats, D. (1980) “Individuals and aggregates: a note on historical data and assumptions.” Social Sci. History, 5: 229–250.Google Scholar
Bourke, P. and DeBats, D. (1978) “Identifiable voting in nineteenth-century America: toward a comparison of Britain and the United States before the secret ballot.” Perspectives in Amer. History 11: 259–288.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W. and Stokes, D. (1964) The American voter: an abridgement. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Drake, M. (1974) Introduction to Historical Psephology. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Drake, M. (1971) “The mid-victorial voter.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 1, 3: 473–490.Google Scholar
Dybdahl, V. (1969) Partier og erhverv. Studier i partiorganisation og byerhvervenȩs politiske aktivitet ca. 1880-ca. 1913 (2 vols.). Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget i Aarhus.Google Scholar
Elklit, J. (1982) “Partivalg og mobilisering: Fredericia 1890-1903.” Fortid og Nutid: 409–439.Google Scholar
Elklit, J. (1980) “Election laws and electoral behaviour in Denmark until 1920,” pp. 366–397 in Busch, O. (ed.) Wahlerbewegungen in der europaischen Geschichte. Berlin: Colloquium.Google Scholar
Elklit, J. (1973a) “Valg-og stemmelister vedr. folketingsvalg 1849-98 i Landarkivet for Nørrejylland. En foreløbig oversigt.” Arkiv 4: 232–273.Google Scholar
Elklit, J. (1973b) “Om unforskningen af vaelgeradfaerd i Danmark i det 19. aarhundrede.” Historie 10, 2: 266–288.Google Scholar
Elklit, J. and Mitchell, J. C. (1980) “The legacy of open voting. Patron/client relations and the development of mass politics in England and Denmark.” Prepared for an ECPR-workshop on “Clientelist Political System,” Florence, Italy, March.Google Scholar
Elklit, J. and Skytte, J. (1980) “Find Person by Name (FPN). Et nominal record linkage program til anvendelse pa blandt andet danske politiske og sociale massedata fra det 19.” Aarhundredes sidste del, paper for the seminar “Hiistoriske databaser i Norden.” Ustein Kloster, Norge, (maj). Aarhus: Institut for Statkundskab.Google Scholar
Høgh, E. (1972) Vaelgeradfaerd i Danmark 1849-1901. En politisk sociologisk analyse. Kobenhavn: Paludan.Google Scholar
McKenzie, R. and Silver, A. (1968) Angels in marble. Working Class Conservatives in Urban England. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Milbrath, L. W. and Goel, M. L. (1977) Political Participation. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. C. (1976a) “Electoral strategy under open voting: evidence from England 1832-1880.” Public Choice 28: 17–35.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. C. (1976b) “Electoral change and the party system in England 1832-1868.” Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University. (Xerox University Microfilms: 76–30, 237.)Google Scholar
Moore, D. C. (1976) The Politics of Deference: A study of the Mid-Nineteenth Century English Political System. Hassocks, England: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Stienbrenner, K., and Bent, D. H.. (1975) SPSS. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ohngren, B. (1974) Folk i rörelse. Samhällsutvekling, flyttningsmönster och folkrörelser i Eskilstuna 1870-1900. Studia Historica Uppsaliensia 55. Uppsala: Historical Institute of the University and Almgvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Parkin, F. (1972) Class inequality and political order. Social stratification in capitalist and communist societies. London: Granada.Google Scholar
Parkin, F. (1967) “Working-class conservatives: a theory of political deviance.” British J. of Sociology 18: 278–290.Google Scholar
Powell, G. B. Jr. (1980) “Voting turnout in thirty democracies: partisan, legal and socio-economic influences,” pp. 5–34 in Rose, R. (ed.) Electoral Participation. A Comparative Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. (1970) “Electoral, systems,” pp. 147–168 in Rokkan, S. (ed.) Citizens. Elections. Parties. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Sheingold, C. A. (1973) “Social networks and voting: the resurrection of a research agenda.” Amer. Soc. Rev. 38: 712–720.Google Scholar
Statistiske Meddelelser (1851) Ny Raekke, Andet Bind, København.Google Scholar