Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:54:27.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disentangling the Effect of Valence and Arousal on Judgments Concerning Moral Transgressions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2015

Luis de la Viña ,
David Garcia-Burgos ,
Yasmina Okan ,
Antonio Cándido  and
Felisa González
Luis de la Viña
Affiliation:
Universidad de Granada (Spain)
David Garcia-Burgos
Affiliation:
University of Fribourg (Switzerland)
Yasmina Okan
Affiliation:
University of Leeds (UK)
Antonio Cándido
Affiliation:
Universidad de Granada (Spain)
Felisa González*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Granada (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Felisa González. Departmento de Psicología Experimental. Universidad de Granada. Campus Cartuja s/n. 18071. Granada (Spain). E-mail: (fgreyes@ugr.es)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An increasing body of research has investigated the effect of emotions on judgments concerning moral transgressions. Yet, few studies have controlled for arousal levels associated with the emotions. High arousal may affect moral processing by triggering attention to salient features of transgressions, independently of valence. Therefore previously documented differences in effects of negative and positive emotions may have been confounded by differences in arousal. We conducted two studies to shed light on this issue. In Study 1 we developed a questionnaire including vignettes selected on the basis of psychometrical properties (i.e., mean ratings of the actions and variability). This questionnaire was administered to participants in Study 2, after presenting them with selected pictures inducing different valence but equivalent levels of arousal. Negative pictures led to more severe moral judgments than neutral (p = .054, d = 0.60) and positive pictures (p = .002, d = 1.02), for vignettes that were not associated with extreme judgments. In contrast, positive pictures did not reliably affect judgments concerning such vignettes. These findings suggest that the observed effects of emotions cannot be accounted for by an increase in attention linked to the arousal which accompanies these emotions.

Keywords

arousalemotionmoral judgmentmoral transgressionvalence
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 18 , 2015 , E61
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amit, E., & Greene, J. D. (2012). You see, the ends don’t justify the means: Visual imagery and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 23, 861–868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434965 Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Putnam.Google Scholar
Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A., & Prinz, J. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22, 295–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611398497 Google Scholar
Greene, J. D. (2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 322–323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7 Google Scholar
Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2011). Emotions as moral amplifiers: An appraisal tendency to the influences of distinct emotions upon moral judgment. Emotion Review, 3, 237–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1754073911402384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., Keltner, D., & Cohen, A. B. (2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 963–976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017423 Google Scholar
Huebner, B., Dwyer, S., & Hauser, M. (2009). The role of emotion in moral psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.006 Google Scholar
Knutson, K. M., Krueger, F., Koenings, M., Hawley, A., Escobedo, J. R., Vasudeva, V., … Grafman, J. (2010). Behavioral norms for condensed moral vignettes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 378–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq005 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauseret, , & Damasio, A. (2007). Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgments. Nature, 446, 908–911. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Digitized photographs, instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report A-6. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.Google Scholar
Moltó, J., Montañés, S., Poy, R., Segarra, P., Pastor, M. C., Tormo, M. P., … Vila, J. (1999). Un nuevo método para el estudio experimental de las emociones: El “International Affective Picture System (IAPS)”. Adaptación española [A new method for the experimental study of emotions: The international affective picture system (IAPS). Spanish adaptation]. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 52, 55–87.Google Scholar
Monin, B., Pizarro, D. A., & Beer, J. S. (2007). Deciding versus reacting: Conceptions of moral judgment and the reason-affect debate. Review of General Psychology, 11, 99–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.99 Google Scholar
Mourão-Miranda, E. V., Volchan, E., Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Oliveira, L., Bramati, I., … Pessoa, L. (2003). Contributions of stimulus valence and arousal to visual activation during emotional perception. NeuroImage, 20, 1955–1963. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.011 Google Scholar
Musch, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2003). Affective priming, findings and theories. In Musch, J. & Klauer, K. C. (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation (pp. 9–50). New Jersey NJ: L.E.A.Google Scholar
O'Hara, R. E., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Sinnott-Armstrong, N. A. (2010). Wording effects in moral judgments. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 547–554.Google Scholar
Olivera la Rosa, A., & Roselló Mir, J. (2013). On the relationship between disgust and morality: A critical review. Psicothema, 25, 222–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2012.159 Google Scholar
Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., & Green, J. D. (2011). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36, 163–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (2008). Disgust. In Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions, (3 rd Ed., pp. 757–776). New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Salerno, J. M., & Peter-Hagene, C. P. (2013). The interactive effect of anger and disgust on moral outrage and judgments. Psychological Science, 24, 2069–2078. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486988 Google Scholar
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096–1109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167208317771 Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513 Google Scholar
Seidel, A., & Prinz, J. (2012). Mad and glad: Musically induced emotions have divergent impact on morals. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 629–637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9320-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidel, A., & Prinz, J. (2013). Sound morality: Irritating and icky noises amplify judgments in divergent moral domains. Cognition, 127, 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.004 Google Scholar
Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 322–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohminger, N., Lewis, R. L., & Meyer, D. E. (2011). Divergent effects of different positive emotions on moral judgment. Cognition, 119, 295–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.012 Google Scholar
Suter, R. S., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Time and moral judgment. Cognition, 119, 454–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.018 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, J. J. (1976). Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. The Monist, 59, 204–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/monist197659224 Google Scholar
Ugazio, G., Lamm, C., & Singer, T. (2012). The role of emotions for moral judgments depends on the type of emotion and moral scenario. Emotion, 12, 579–590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024611 Google Scholar
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17, 476–477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01731.x Google Scholar
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2008). The duality of virtue: Deconstructing the moral hypocrite. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1334–1338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.010 Google Scholar
Vila, J., Sánchez, M., Ramírez, I., Fernández, M. C., Cobos, P., Rodríguez, S., … Moltó, J. (2001). El sistema internacional de imágenes afectivas (IAPS): Adaptación española. Segunda parte [The international affective picture system (IAPS): Spanish adaptation. Second part]. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 54, 635–657.Google Scholar
Waldmann, M. R., Nagel, J., & Wiegmann, A. (2012). Moral judgment. In Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 364–389). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780–784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01614.x Google Scholar
Zarkadi, T., & Schnall, S. (2013). “Black and white” thinking: Visual contrast polarizes moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 355–359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.012 Google Scholar