Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T01:38:29.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parental Socialization Styles, Parents' Educational Level, and Sexist Attitudes in Adolescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Maite Garaigordobil  and
Jone Aliri
Maite Garaigordobil*
Affiliation:
Universidad del País Vasco (Spain)
Jone Aliri
Affiliation:
Universidad del País Vasco (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Maite Garaigordobil. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad del País Vasco, Avenida de Tolosa 70, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián (Spain). E-mail: maite.garaigordobil@ehu.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aims of this study were to analyze the differences in the mothers' and fathers' socialization styles depending on their children's sex; whether there are differences in hostile, benevolent, and ambivalent sexism, and neosexism as a function of both parents' socialization styles; and whether the parents' educational level affects their level of sexism and their children's sexism. The sample included 1,455 adolescents and their parents (764 mothers and 648 fathers). The results showed no differences in the socialization style of the father with his children's sexism, but the mother used a more authoritarian style with her daughters. The parents' socialization style had little influence on their children's sexism, although it had a higher impact on the sons' sexism. The father's style had less influence than the mother's on their sons' sexism, and it had no influence on their daughters' sexism. The indulgent style of both parents had the highest relation with a low level of sexism. Moreover, a negative correlation was found between the parents' educational level and their level of sexism, as well as between the mother's educational level and her daughters' sexism. To conclude, the indulgent style and the mother's high educational level promote fewer sexist attitudes.

Los objetivos del estudio fueron analizar las diferencias en los estilos de socialización parental en función del sexo de sus hijos; analizar las diferencias en el sexismo hostil, benevolente, ambivalente y neosexismo en función del estilo de socialización parental; y estudiar las relaciones entre nivel educativo parental y sexismo. La muestra incluyó 1.455 adolescentes y sus padres (764 madres, 648 padres). Los resultados no mostraron diferencias en el estilo de socialización del padre con sus hijos e hijas, sin embargo, la madre utilizaba más un estilo autoritario con las hijas. El estilo de socialización parental no influyó mucho en el sexismo de sus hijos e hijas, aunque afectó más al de los hijos. El estilo del padre tuvo menor influencia que el de la madre en el sexismo de sus hijos, y no tuvo ninguna influencia en el sexismo de sus hijas. El estilo indulgente fue el que más se relacionó con un bajo nivel de sexismo. Además, se halló una correlación negativa entre nivel educativo parental y su nivel de sexismo, así como entre el nivel educativo maternal y el sexismo en sus hijas. En conclusión, el estilo indulgente y un alto nivel educativo maternal fomentan actitudes menos sexistas.

Keywords

sexismparental socializationadolescencesexismosocialización parentaladolescencia
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , July 2012 , pp. 592 - 603
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ato, M., & Vallejo, G. (2007). Diseños experimentales en psicología [Experimental designs in psychology]. Madrid, Spain: Pirámide.Google Scholar
Bulnes, M., Ponce, C., Huerta, R., Álvarez, C., Santiváñez, W., Atalaya, M. … Morocho, J. (2008). Resiliencia y estilos de socialización parental en escolares de 4° y 5° año de secundaria de Lima Metropolitana [Resilience and depression in high school students metropolitan Lima with or without participating in violent acts]. Revista de Investigación en Psicología, 11, 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buysse, T. M. (2000). The mother-daughter relationship and the development of daughters' feminist consciousness. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 60 (12–B), 6419.Google Scholar
Cameron, C. (1977). Sex-role attitudes. In Oskamp, S. (Ed.), Attitudes and opinions (pp. 339–359). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
de Lemus, S., Castillo, M., Moya, M., Padilla, J. L., & Ryan, E. (2008). Elaboración y validación del Inventario de Sexismo Ambivalente para Adolescentes [Development and validation of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory for Adolescents]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 8, 537–562.Google Scholar
Ex, C. T., & Janssens, J. M. (1998). Maternal influences on daughters' gender role attitudes. Sex Roles, 38, 171–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018776931419Google Scholar
Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). G*POWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28(1), 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Expósito, F., Moya, M., & Glick, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: medición y correlatos [Ambivalent sexism: Measurement and correlates]. Revista de Psicología Social, 1, 159–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021347498760350641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 4, 1149–1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrer, V. A., Bosch, E., Ramis, M. C., & Navarro, C. (2006). Las creencias y actitudes sobre la violencia contra las mujeres en la pareja: determinantes sociodemográficos, familiares y formativos [Beliefs and attitudes about violence against the female partner: socio-demographics, familiar and formative determinants]. Anales de Psicología, 22, 251–259.Google Scholar
Garaigordobil, M., & Durá, A. (2006). Neosexismo en adolescentes de 14 a 17 años: relaciones con autoconcepto-autoestima, personalidad, psicopatología, problemas de conducta y habilidades sociales [Neosexism in adolescents aged 14 to 17: relationships with self-concept/self-esteem, personality, psychopathology, behavioral problems and social skills]. Clínica y Salud, 17, 127–149.Google Scholar
Garaigordobil, M., & Fagoaga, J. M. (2006). Juego cooperativo para prevenir la violencia en los centros educativos [Cooperative games to prevent violence at school]. Madrid, Spain: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.Google Scholar
Garaigordobil, M., Maganto, C., Pérez, J. I., & Sansinenea, E. (2009). Gender differences in socio-emotional developmental factors during adolescence and effects of a violence prevention program. Journal of Adolescent Health, 44, 468–477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jadohealth.2008.09.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, J. F., & Gracia, E. (2009). Is always authoritative the optimum parenting style? Evidence from Spanish families. Adolescence, 44, 101–131.Google ScholarPubMed
García, J. F., & Gracia, E. (2010). ¿Qué estilo de socialización parental es el idóneo en España? Un estudio con niños y adolescentes de 10 a 14 años [What is the optimum parental socialisation style in Spain? A study with children and adolescents aged 10-14 years]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 33, 365–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021037010792215118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, J. F., Pascual, J., Frías, M. D., Van Krunckelsven, D., & Murgui, S. (2008). Diseño y análisis de la potencia: n y los intervalos de confianza de las medias [Design and power analysis: n and confidence intervals of means]. Psicothema, 20, 933–938.Google Scholar
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The Ambivalence toward Men Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519–536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications of gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huver, R. M. E., Otten, R., de Vries, H., & Engels, C. M. E. (2009). Personality and parenting style in parents of adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 395–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.07.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lameiras, M., & Rodríguez, Y. (2003). Evaluación del sexismo ambivalente en estudiantes gallegos/as [Evaluation of ambivalent sexism in Galician students]. Acción Psicológica, 2, 131–136.Google Scholar
Leaper, C. (2002). Parenting girls and boys. In Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lee, I., Pratto, F., & Li, M. (2007). Social relationships and sexism in The United States and Taiwan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 595–612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022107305241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lila, M., Gracia, E., & García, J. F. (2010) Actitudes de la policía ante la intervención en casos de violencia contra la mujer en las relaciones de pareja: Influencia del sexismo y la empatía [Police attitudes toward intervention in cases of partner violence against women: The influence of sexism and empathy]. Revista de Psicología Social, 25, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchetti, B. (1997). Concetto di se'relazioni familiari e valori [Concept of the family relationships and values]. (Thesis in Social Psychology) Universita degli Studi di Bologna. Italy.Google Scholar
Martínez, I., & García, J. F. (2007). Impact of parenting styles on adolescents' self-esteem and internalization of values in Spain. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 338–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez, I., & García, J. F. (2008). Internalization of values and self-esteem among Brazilian teenagers from authoritative, indulgent, authoritarian, and neglectful homes. Adolescence, 43, 13–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Martínez, I., García, J. F., & Yubero, S. (2007). Parenting styles and adolescents' self-esteem in Brazil. Psychological Reports, 100, 731–745. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/PR0.100.3.731-745CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez Festorazzi, V., Castañeiras, C., & Posada, M. C. (2010, February). Socialización y adolescencia: efecto diferencial de los estilos parentales en adolescentes escolarizados [Socialization and adolescence: Differential effect of parental styles in adolescent students]. Comunication presented at the 11th Virtual Congress of Psychiatry, Interpsiquis, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.psiquiatria.com/articulos/psiq_general_y_otras_areas/investigacion/45618/Google Scholar
McKinney, C., & Renk, K. (2008). Differential parenting between mothers and fathers: Implications for late adolescents. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 806–827. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07311222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moya, M. (2003). El análisis psicosocial del género [The psychosocial analysis of gender]. In Morales, J.F. & Huici, C. (Eds.), Estudios de Psicología Social [Social Psychology Studies] (pp. 175–221). Madrid, Spain: UNED.Google Scholar
Moya, M. (2004). Actitudes sexistas y nuevas formas de sexismo [Sexist attitudes and new forms of sexism]. In Barberá, E. & Martínez-Benlloch, I. (Eds.), Psicología y Género [Psychology and Gender] (pp. 271–294). Madrid, Spain: Pearson.Google Scholar
Moya, M., & Expósito, F. (2001). Nuevas formas, viejos intereses: Neosexismo en varones españoles [New forms, old interests: Neosexism among Spanish men]. Psicothema, 13, 643–649.Google Scholar
Moya, M., Expósito, F., & Padilla, J. L. (2006). Revisión de las propiedades psicométricas de las versiones larga y reducida de la Escala sobre Ideología de Género [Review of the psychometric properties of long and short versions of the Gender Ideology Scale]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6, 709–727.Google Scholar
Moya, M., Navas, L., & Gómez, B. C. (1991, September). Escala sobre la ideología del rol sexual [Scale of sex role ideology]. Records of the Congress of Social Psychology (pp. 554–566). Santiago de Compostela, Spain.Google Scholar
Moya, M., Páez, D., Glick, P., Fernández, I., & Poeschl, G. (2002). Sexismo, masculinidad-feminidad y factores culturales [Sexism, masculinity-femininity and cultural factors]. Revista Electrónica de Motivación y Emoción, 3, 127–142.Google Scholar
Musitu, G. (2000). Socialización familiar y valores en el adolescente: Un análisis intercultural [Family socialization and values in adolescents: an intercultural analysis]. Anuario de Psicología, 31, 15–32.Google Scholar
Musitu, G., & García, F. (2001). ESPA29. Escala de Estilos de Socialización Parental en la Adolescencia [Scale of Parental Socialization Styles in Adolescence]. Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Pérez, J. F. G. (2008). Métodos de investigación, diseño y técnicas en las ciencias del comportamiento [Research methods, design and techniques in behavioral sciences]. Valencia, Spain: Palmero Ediciones.Google Scholar
Pérez, J. F. G., Navarro, D. F., & Llobell, J. P. (1999). Potencia estadística del diseño de Solomon [Statistical power of the Solomon design]. Psicothema, 1, 431–436.Google Scholar
Pychyl, T. A., Coplan, R. J., & Reid, P. A. M. (2002). Parenting and procrastination: Gender differences in the relations between procrastination, parenting style and self-worth in early adolescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 271–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869%2801%2900151-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffaelli, M., & Ontai, L. (2004). Gender socialization in Latino/a families: Results from two retrospective studies. Sex Roles, 50, 287–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000018886.58945.06CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabattini, L., & Leaper, C. (2004). The relation between mothers' and fathers' parenting styles and their division of labor in the home: Young adults' retrospective reports. Sex Roles, 50, 217–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000015553.82390.f7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearer, C. (2008). Gender socialization in the family. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 68(10–B), 7004.Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, H., & Leaper, C. (2002). Are parents' gender schemas related to their children's gender-related cognitions? A metaanalysis. Developmental Psychology, 38, 615–630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.615CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus ça change, plus c'est pareil [Neosexism: The more things change, more they stay the same]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842–849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167295218007CrossRefGoogle Scholar