Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-76ns8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:15:19.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship between Achievement Goals and Students’ Self-Reported Personal and Social Responsibility Behaviors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2015

Bulent Agbuga ,
Ping Xiang  and
Ron E. McBride
Bulent Agbuga*
Affiliation:
Pamukkale University (Turkey)
Ping Xiang
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University (USA)
Ron E. McBride
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University (USA)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Bulent Agbuga. Department of Physical Education and Sport. Pamukkale University. Denizli (Turkey). 20100. E-mail: bakboga@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study utilized the 2x2 achievement goal model (mastery-approach, mastery-avoidance, performance-approach, performance-avoidance goals) to explore the relationships between achievement goals and self-reported personal and social responsibility behaviors in high school physical education settings. Two hundred and twenty one Turkish students completed questionnaires assessing their achievement goals, personal and social responsibility behaviors. Results of the one-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant differences among the four achievement goals, F(3, 660) = 137.05, p < .001, η2 = .39. The result also revealed that students were more likely to endorse the mastery-approach goal than three other goals. The simple correlations revealed mastery-approach and performance-approach goals were positively related to students’ self-reported personal (r = .54, p < .001; r = .37, p < .001, respectively) and social responsibility (r = .38, p < .001; r = .22, p < .001, respectively) behaviors. However, hierarchical regression analyses indicated only the mastery-approach goal emerged as the significant positive predictor, b = .52, t(216) = 7.19, p < .001 for personal responsibility behaviors, and b = .41, t(216) = 5.23, p < .001 for social responsibility behaviors. These findings seem to provide convergent evidence that mastery-approach goals are positively related to positive educational outcomes.

Keywords

achievement goalshigh school studentspersonal and social responsibility behaviorsphysical education
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 18 , 2015 , E22
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adie, J. W., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2008). Achievement goals, competition appraisals, and the psychological and emotional welfare of sport participants. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 302–322.Google Scholar
Agbuga, B. (2009). Reliabity and validity of the trichotomous and 2×2 achievement goal models in turkish university physical activity settings. Journal of Human Kinetics, 22, 77–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10078-009-0026-1 Google Scholar
Agbuga, B., & Xiang, P. (2008). Achievement goals and their relations to self-reported persistence/effort among Turkish students in secondary physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 179–191.Google Scholar
Agbuga, B., Xiang, P., & McBride, R. (2010). Achievement goals and their relations to children’s disruptive behaviors in an after-school physical activity program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 278–294.Google Scholar
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 84, 261–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.84.3.261 Google Scholar
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley y Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, M. W., & Gudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K. A. & Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing structure equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cecchini-Estrada, J. A., González-Mesa, C. G., Méndez-Giménez, A., & Fernández-Río, J. (2011). Achievement goals, social goals, and motivational regulations in physical education settings. Psicothema, 23, 51–57.Google Scholar
Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, A. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 43–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.43 Google Scholar
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.309 Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structures of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 Google Scholar
DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and application. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.41.10.1040 Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In Maehr, M. & Pintrich, P. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 243–279). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3 Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.3.501 Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549–563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.91.3.549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escartí, A., Gutiérrez, M., & Pascual, C. (2011). Propiedades psicométricas de la version española del Cuestionario de Responsabilidad Personal y Social en contextos de educación física [Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Personal and Social Responsibility Questionnaire]. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 20, 119–130.Google Scholar
Escartí, A., Gutiérrez, M., Pascual, C., & Llopis, R. (2010). Implementation of the personal and social responsibility model to improve self-efficacy during physical education classes for primary school children. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10, 387–402.Google Scholar
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garn, A. C., & Cothran, D. J. (2009). Correlates of a high 2x2 achievement goal profile in a fitness testing context: A qualitative analysis. Sport and Exercise Psychology Review, 5, 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, B. (2010). An examination of the responsibility model in a New Zealand secondary school physical education program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 21–37.Google Scholar
Guan, J., McBride, R., & Xiang, P. (2006). Reliability and validity evidence for the social goal scale-physical education in high school settings. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 226–238.Google Scholar
Guan, J., McBride, R., & Xiang, P. (2007). A comparison of the trichotomous and 2x2 achievement goal models in high school physical education settings. Measurement in Physical Education, and Exercise Science, 11, 109–129.Google Scholar
Guan, J., Xiang, P., McBride, R., & Bruene, A. (2006). Achievement goals, social goals, and students’ reported persistence and effort in high school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 58–74.Google Scholar
Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Hellison, D. (2003). Teaching responsibility through physical activity (2 nd Ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Hellison, D. (2011). Teaching personal and social responsibility through physical activity (3 rd Ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Hellison, D., & Martinek, T. (2006). Social and individual responsibility programs. In Kirk, D., Macdonald, D., & O’Sullivan, M. (Eds.), The handbook of physical education (pp. 610–626). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hellison, D., & Wright, P. (2003). Retention in an urban extended day program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 369–381.Google Scholar
Hicks, L., Murphy, A. M., & Patrick, H. (1995). Social goals and achievement goals in early adolescence. San Francisco, CA: Poster presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 158–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.), Structural Equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Con-ventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd Ed). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Li, W., Wright, P. M., Rukavina, P., & Pickering, M. (2008). Measuring students’ perceptions of personal and social responsibility and its relationship to intrinsic motivation in urban physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 167–178.Google Scholar
Maehr, M. L. (1983). On doing well in science: Why Johnny no longer excels: why Sarah never did. In Paris, S. G., Olson, G. M., & Stevenson, H. W. (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom (pp. 179–210). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McIver, J. P., & Carmines, E. G. (1981). Unidimensional scaling. Quantitative Applications in Social Science, 24, 96–107.Google Scholar
Milli Egitim Bakanligi. (1995). Ilkögretim okullari, lise ve dengi okullar beden egitimi dersi ögretim programlari. [Physical education curriculums for primary and secondary schools]. Istanbul, Turkey: Milli Egitim Basimevi.Google Scholar
Ministry of National Education. (2001, January). Turkish education system and developments in education. (Presented at the 46th session of the International Conference on Education). Geneva, Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE/natrap/Turkey.pdf Google Scholar
Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (1994). Teaching physical education (4 th Ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3 rd Ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
van Yperen, , , N. W., Eliot, A. J., & Anseel, F. (2009). The influence of mastery-avoidance goals on performance improvement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 932–943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.590 Google Scholar
Witkow, M. R., & Fuligni, A. J. (2007). Achievement goals and daily school experiences among adolescents with Asian, Latino and European American backgrounds. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 584–596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.584 Google Scholar
Wright, P. M., & Burton, S. (2008). Implementation and outcomes of a responsibility-based physical activity program integrated into an intact high school physical education class. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 138–154.Google Scholar
Wright, , Li, W., Ding, S., & Pickering, M. (2010). Integrating a personal and social responsibility program into a Wellness course for urban high school students: Assessing implementation and educational outcomes, Sport, Education and Society, 15, 277–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2010.493309 Google Scholar
Wright, P. M., White, K., & Gaebler-Spira, D. (2004). Exploring the relevance of the personal and social responsibility model in adapted physical activity: A collective case study. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23, 71–87.Google Scholar