Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:44:09.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validation study of the Spanish Version of the Work-Family Conflict Questionnaire (CCTF)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Angel Blanch  and
Anton Aluja
Angel Blanch*
Affiliation:
Universitat de Lleida (Spain)
Anton Aluja
Affiliation:
Universitat de Lleida (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Angel Blanch. Department of Pedagogy and Psychology. Universitat de Lleida, Avda. Estudi General, 4. 25001 Lleida, (Spain). Phone: +34 - 973706529; Fax: +34 - 973706505. E-mail: ablanch@pip.udl.cat
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, a brief Work-Family Conflict (WFC) Questionnaire in the Spanish language is proposed that takes into account the two directions commonly reported in the literature: work interference with family (WIF), and family interference with work (FIW). The results obtained through exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) with two independent samples, carried out for women and men, showed acceptable validity and reliability. A copy of the instrument in Spanish language is provided, together with the Amos 4 syntax to perform the factor invariance analysis for women and men. The suggested Work-Family Conflict Questionnaire (in Spanish, abbreviated as CCTF) may be useful in studies performed in the work setting, considering the special relevance of the concept in this line of research.

En este estudio se propone un cuestionario breve en lengua española para medir conflicto trabajo – familia, que tiene en cuenta las dos direcciones comúnmente informadas en la literatura: interferencia del trabajo en la familia (TF), e interferencia de la familia en el trabajo (FT). Los resultados obtenidos mediante análisis factorial exploratorio y análisis factorial confirmatorio con dos muestras independientes y llevados a cabo para mujeres y hombres, mostraron una validez y fiabilidad aceptables. Se proporciona una copia del instrumento utilizado en lengua española, así como la sintaxis en Amos 4 para llevar a cabo el análisis de invarianza factorial para mujeres y hombres. El cuestionario de conflicto trabajo – familia (CCTF) que se propone, puede ser útil en los estudios realizados en el mundo del trabajo, ya que se trata de un concepto de especial relevancia en esta línea de investigación.

Keywords

work-family conflictexploratory factor analysesconfirmatory factor analysesconflicto trabajo – familiaanálisis factorial exploratorioanálisis factorial confirmatorio
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , November 2009 , pp. 746 - 755
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, T.D., Herst, D.E.L., Bruck, C.S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 278–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aluja, A., García, O., & García, L. (2003). A psychometric analysis of the revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire short scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbuckle, J.L. (1999). AMOS 4 [Computer software]. Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation.Google Scholar
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, M.W. (2000). Cross-validation methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 108–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K.A. & Long, J.S. (Eds.), Testing structural equations models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, D.S., & Perrewé, P.L. (1999). The role of social support in the stressor-strain relationship: An examination of work-family conflict. Journal of Management, 25, 513–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinamon, R.G., & Rich, Y. (2002). Gender differences in the importance of work and family roles: Implications for work-family conflict. Sex Roles, 47, 531–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cuadrado, I., Morales, J.F., & Recio, P. (2008). Women's access to managerial positions: An experimental study of leadership styles and gender. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 55–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Luis Carnicer, M.P., Martínez, A., Pérez, M., & Vela, M.J. (2004). Work-family conflict in a southern European country. The influence of job-related and non-related factors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 466–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eby, L.T., Casper, W.J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2000). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980-2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J.R., & Rothbard, N.P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25, 178–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C., & Strahan, E.J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, M.T., Heinen, B.A., & Langkamer, K.L. (2007). Work and family satisfaction and conflict: A meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frone, M.R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M.L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work- family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N.J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutek, B., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role-explanation for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, N.W.H., Kant, I., Kristensen, T.S., & Nijhuis, F.J.N. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of work-family conflict: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 5, 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karasek, R.A. (1985). Job Content Questionnaire and user's guide. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering.Google Scholar
Martínez-Pérez, M.D., & Osca, A. (2001). Estudio psicométrico de la versión española de la escala de “Conflicto Familia-Trabajo” de Kopelman, Greenhaus y Connoly (1983). Revista de Psicologia Social, 16, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Pérez, M.D., & Osca Segovia, A. (2002). Análisis psicométrico del Inventario de Apoyo Familiar para Trabajadores [Psychometric analysis of the Family Support Inventory for Workers]. Psicothema, 14, 310–316.Google Scholar
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S.E. (1986). Maslach Burnout Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S.E. (1997). MBI. Inventario “Burnout” de Maslach. Síndrome del “quemado” por estrés laboral asistencial. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.Google Scholar
Mesmer-Magnus, J.R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Convergence between measures of work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, S. (1994). Foundations of validity: Meaning and consequences in psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 1–9.Google Scholar
O'Connor, B.P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsson, U.H., Foss, T., Troye, S.V., & Howell, R.D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 557–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Gil, J.A., Chacón Moscoso, S.& Moreno Rodríguez, R. (2000). Validez de constructo: El uso del análisis factorial exploratorio-confirmatorio para obtener evidencias de validez. Psicothema, 12, 442–446.Google Scholar
Spector, P.E.& Jex, S.M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 356–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, V., Power, K.G., & Simpson, R.J. (1998). Occupational stress and family life: A comparison of male and female doctors. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71, 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velicer, W.F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, W.& Eagly, A.H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed