Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T19:44:50.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Egoism and Group Identity: Empathy toward the Other and Awareness of Others in a Social Dilemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Luis Oceja  and
Isabel Jiménez
Luis Oceja*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Isabel Jiménez
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: Luis Oceja Fernández, Ciudad Universitaria Cantoblanco (UAM), Facultad de Psicología, Despacho 83, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, km. 15, 28049 Madrid (Spain). E-mail: luis.oceja@uam.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In three experiments, participants were faced with a social dilemma in which they could benefit themselves, the group, or other group members as individuals. The results showed that participants who felt high empathy toward a certain individual allocated more resources to the target of empathy, but without reducing the collective good. Then, we adapted the measure of empathy developed by Batson and colleagues (Batson, Ahmad, et al., 1999; Batson, Batson, et al., 1995) to the Spanish context. The results of Experiment 3 supported the existence of a new process: awareness of other individuals present in the social dilemma. It is proposed that this process is independent of those typically studied in research of this field: self-interest, group identification, and the empathy for a specific individual.

En tres experimentos se presentó a los participantes un dilema social en el que podían beneficiarse a sí mismos, al grupo, o a individuos concretos del grupo. En primer lugar, los resultados mostraron que las participantes que sintieron una alta empatía por un individuo concreto le adjudicaron más recursos, pero sin perjudicar al bien colectivo. En segundo lugar, se adaptó al castellano la medida de empatía elaborada por Batson y sus colegas (Batson, Ahmad, et al., 1999; Batson, Batson, et al., 1995). En tercer lugar, los resultados del Experimento 3 apoyaron la existencia de un nuevo proceso: la conciencia de la existencia de otros individuos presentes en el dilema social. Se propone que este proceso es independiente de los tradicionalmente estudiados por la investigación en este campo: el auto-interés, la identificación con el grupo, y la empatía sentida hacia un individuo en concreto.

Keywords

empathyawareness of otherssocial dilemmaempatíaconciencia de otrosdilema social
Type
Articles
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , November 2007 , pp. 369 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batson, C.D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65–122). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Batson, C.D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a socialpsychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Batson, C.D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In Gilbert, D.T. & Fiske, S.T. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 282–316). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Batson, C.D., Ahmad, N., Yin, J., Bedell, S.J., Johnson, J.W., Templin, C.M., & Whiteside, A. (1999). Two threats to the common good: Self-interested egoism and empathy-induced altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C.D., Batson, J.G., Todd, R.M., Brummett, B.H., Shaw, L.L., & Aldeguer, C.M.R. (1995). Empathy and the collective good: Caring for one of the others in a social dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, R.B., Brown, S.L., Lewis, B.P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S.L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 749–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M.H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Madison, WI: Brown Benchmark.Google Scholar
Dawes, R., van de Kragt, A.J.C., & Orbell, J.M. (1990). Cooperation for the benefit of us—not me, or my conscience. In Mansbridge, J.J. (Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 97–110). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J.F., & Penner, L.A. (2001). Helping and altruism. In Fletcher, G. & Clark, M. (Eds.), International handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 162–195). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, D.L., & Sherman, S.J. (1996). Perceiving persons and the groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, M.L. (1989). Empathic emotions and justice in society. Social Justice Research, 3, 283–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, M.L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2005). The “identified victim” effect: An identified group, or just a single individual? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orne, M. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manner, J.K., Luce, C.L., Neuberg, S.L., Cialdini, R.B., Brown, S., & Sagarin, B.J. (2002). The effects of perspective-taking on motivations for helping: Still no evidence for altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1601–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piliavin, J.A., & Charng, H.W. (1990). Altruism: A review of recent theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 27–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, L.A., Dovidio, J.F., Piliavin, J.A., & Schroeder, D.A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multi-level perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. & Austin, W.G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Turner, J.C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar