Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T07:06:53.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamics of the General Factor of Personality in Response to a Single Dose of Caffeine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Antonio Caselles ,
Joan C. Micó  and
Salvador Amigó
Antonio Caselles*
Affiliation:
Universitat de València (Spain)
Joan C. Micó
Affiliation:
Universitat Politècnica de València (Spain)
Salvador Amigó
Affiliation:
Universitat de València (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: Antonio Caselles. Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada. Universitat de València. Dr. Moliner, 50, 46100 Burjassot. Valencia (Spain). E-mail: Antonio.Caselles@uv.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

General Factor of Personality (GFP) research is an emergent field in personality research. This paper uses a theoretical mathematical model to predict the short-term effects of a dose of a stimulant drug on GFP and reports the results of an experiment showing how caffeine achieves this. This study considers the General Factor of Personality Questionnaire (GFPQ) a good psychometric approach to assess GFP. The GFP dynamic mechanism of change is based on the Unique Trait Personality Theory (UTPT). This theory proposes the existence of GFP which occupies the apex of the hierarchy of personality, and extends from an impulsiveness-and-aggressiveness pole (approach tendency) to an anxiety-andintroversion pole (avoidance tendency). An experiment with 25 volunteers was performed. All the participants completed the GFPQ and the Sensation-Seeking Scale list of adjectives from the trait version of MAACL-R (Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist Revised) on an empty stomach. The participants in the experimental group (20) received 330 mg of caffeine. All the participants filled in a state version form with the sensation-seeking adjectives every 4.5 minutes. This study considers that the Sensation-Seeking Scale list of adjectives from the MAACL-R, available in both trait and state versions, is a good psychometric approach to assess GFP. The results show that GFP is modified by a single dose of caffeine in the direction predicted by the UTPT.

La investigación sobre el Factor General de Personalidad (FGP) es un campo emergente en la investigación sobre personalidad. Este artículo presenta un modelo matemático y teórico para predecir los efectos a corto plazo de una dosis de droga estimulante sobre el FGP y presenta los resultados de un experimento con café. El Cuestionario del Factor General de Personalidad (CFGP) es aquí considerado como una buena aproximación psicométrica para medir el FGP. Los mecanismos dinámicos de cambio del FGP están basados en la Teoría del Rasgo Único de Personalidad (TRUP). Esta teoría propone la existencia de un FGP que se sitúa en la cúspide de la estructura jerárquica de personalidad, y se extiende desde un polo de agresividad-impulsividad (tendencia de aproximación) hasta un polo de introversiónansiedad (tendencia de evitación). Se llevó a cabo un experimento con 25 voluntarios. Todos los participantes cumplimentaron en ayunas el Cuestionario del Factor General de Personalidad (CFGP) y la lista de adjetivos de búsqueda de sensaciones del MAACL-R en su versión de rasgo. Los participantes del grupo experimental (20) recibieron 330 mg de cafeína. Todos los participantes cumplimentaron un cuestionario con los adjetivos de búsqueda de sensaciones, en su versión de estado, cada 4.5 minutos. En este estudio se considera que la escala de adjetivos de búsqueda de sensaciones del MAACL-R, tanto en versión rasgo como estado, es una buena aproximación psicométrica del FGP. Los resultados muestran que una dosis de cafeína modifica el FGP en la dirección predicha por la Teoría del Rasgo Único de Personalidad.

Keywords

general factor of personalityunique traitsensation seekingpersonality dynamic modelcaffeinefactor general de personalidadrasgo únicobúsqueda de sensacionesmodelo dinámico de personalidadcafeína
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , November 2011 , pp. 675 - 692
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amigó, S. (2005). La teoría del rasgo único de personalidad. Hacia una teoría unificada del cerebro y la conducta [The Unique Personality Trait Theory. Towards a unified theory of brain and behavior]. Valencia, Spain: Universitat Politècnica de ValènciaGoogle Scholar
Amigó, S., Caselles, A., & Micó, J. C. (2008a). A dynamic extraversion model: the brain's response to a single dose of a stimulant drug. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 211–231. doi:10.1348/000711007X185514Google Scholar
Amigó, S., Micó, J. C., & Caselles, A. (December, 2008b). Adjective scale of the unique personality trait: measure of personality as an overall and complete system. Proceedings of the 7th Congress of the European Systems Union, lisboa, Portugal.Google Scholar
Amigó, S., Micó, J. C., & Caselles, A. (2009). Five adjectives to explain the whole personality: a brief scale of personality. Revista Internacional de Sistemas, 16, 41–43.Google Scholar
Amigó, S., Caselles, A., & Micó, J. C. (2010). The General Factor of Personality Questionnaire (GFPQ): Only one factor tounderstand the personality? The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnaud, M. J. (1987). The pharmacology of caffeine. Progress in Drug Research, 31, 273–313.Google ScholarPubMed
Arnaud, M. J., & Welsch, C. (1982). Theophyline and caffeine metabolism in man. In Reitbrock, N.,Woodcock, B. G., & Staib, A. H. (Eds.), Teophyline and Other Methylxanthines (pp. 135–148). Zurich, Switzerland: Friedrich Vieweg and Sons.Google Scholar
Bogaert, A. F., & Rusthon, J. P. (1989). Sexuality, delinquency and r/K reproductive strategies: Data from Canadian university sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1071–1077. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(89).90259-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonati, M., Latini, R., Tognoni, G., Young, J. F., & Garattini, S. (1984). Interspecies comparison of in vivo caffeine pharmacokinetics in man, monkey, rabbit, rat and mouse. Drug Metabolism Reviews, 15, 1355–1383. doi:10.3109/03602538409029964Google Scholar
Caselles, A. (1998). REGINT: a tool for discovery by complex function fitting. In Trappl, R. (Ed.), Cybernetics and Systems'98, Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies, Vienna, 787–792.Google Scholar
Caselles, A., Micó, J. C., & Amigó, S. (2010). Cocaine addiction and personality: A mathematical model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 449–480. doi:10.1348/000711009X470768CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chrousos, G. P., & Gold, P. W. (1992). The concepts of stress and stress system disorders. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 1244–1252. doi:10.1001/jama.1992. 03480090092034CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childs, E., & De Wit, H. (2006). Subjective, behavioral, and physiological effects of acute caffeine in light, nondependent caffeine users. Psychopharmacology, 185, 514–523. doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0341-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Brabander, B., Hellemans, J., Bone, C., & Gerits, P. (1996). locus of control, sensation seeking, and stress. Psychological Reports, 79, 1307–1312.Google Scholar
Draper, N. R., & Smith, H., (1981). Applied Regression Analysis (2nd Ed.) (pp. 141–192). New York, NY: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
Erdle, S., Irwing, P., Rushton, J. P., & Park, J. (2010). The general factor of personality and its relation to self-esteem in 628,640 Internet respondents. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 343–346. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everly, G. S. (1989). A clinical guide to the treatment of the human stress response. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, Il: Thomas.Google Scholar
Farmer, A., Redman, K., Harris, T., Mahmood, A., Sadler, S. & McGuffin, P. (2001). Sensation-seeking, life events and depression: The Cardiff depression Study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 549–552. doi:10.1192/bjp.178.6.549CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Schneider, S. M. R., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R., … Jacobs, W. J. (2006). Consilience and life History Theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 2, 243–275. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.02.002Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., & Rushton, J. P. (2009). Evidence for shared genetic dominance between the general factor of personality, mental and physical health, and life history traits. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12, 555–563. doi:10.1375/twin.12.6.555CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrett, B. E., & Griffiths, R. R. (1998). Physical dependence increases the relative reinforcing effects of caffeine versus placebo. Psychopharmacology, 139, 195–202. doi:10.1007/s002130050704CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, S. (2000). The imbalanced brain: from normal behavior to schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 48, 81–98. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(00).00903-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haskell, C. F., Kennedy, D. O., Wesnes, K. A., & Scholey, A. B. (2005). Cognitive and mood improvements of caffeine in habitual consumers and habitual non-consumers of caffeine. Psychopharmacology, 179, 813–825. doi:10.1007/s00213-004-2104-3Google Scholar
James, J. E. (1994). Does caffeine enhance or merely restore degraded psychomotor performance? Neuropsychobiology, 3, 124–125.Google Scholar
Lieberman, H. R., Wurtman, R. J., Emde, G. G., Roberts, C., & Coviella, I. L. (1987). The effects of low doses of caffeine on human performance and mood. Psychopharmacology, 92, 308–312. doi:10.1007/BF00210835Google Scholar
Lubin, G., Van Whitlock, R., Reddy, D., & Petren, S. (2001). A comparison of the short and long forms of the Multiple Affect Adjective Check list-Revised (MAACl-R). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 411–416. doi:10.1002/jclp.1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, M., Tiplady, B., & Scholey, A.B. (2002). Interactions between alcohol and caffeine in relation to psychomotor speed and accuracy. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 17, 151–156. doi:10.1002/hup.371Google Scholar
McNair, D. L. M., & Droppleman, L. (1971). Profile of mood states. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. H., De Wit, H., & Zacny, J. P. (1995). Caffeine withdrawal symptoms and self administration following caffeine deprivation. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 51, 941–945. doi:10.1016/0091-3057(94).00426-JGoogle Scholar
Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehlig, A. (1999). Are we dependent upon coffee and caffeine? A review on human and animal data. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 23, 563–576. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(98).00050-5Google Scholar
Nurminen, M. L., Niittynen, L., Korpela, R., & Vapaatalo, H. (1999). Coffee, caffeine and blood pressure: a critical review. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 53, 831–839. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600899CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pelechano, V. (1973). Personalidad y adaptación: tres escuelas y un modelo. Barcelona, Spain: Vicens Vives.Google Scholar
Pelechano, V. (2000). Psicología sistemática de la personalidad. Barcelona, Spain: Ariel.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. D. (2004). The Neuropsychology of Impulsive Antisocial Sensation Seeking Personality Traits: From dopamine to hippocampal function? In Stelmack, R. M. (Ed.), On the Psychobiology of Personality. New York, NY: Elsevier Ldt.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. D., & Smille, L. D. (2008). The behavioral activation system: challenges and opportunities. In Corr, P. J. (Ed.), The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality. New York, NY: Cambrige University Press.Google Scholar
Piazza, P. V., Deroche, V., Deminière, J. M., Maccari, S., Le Moal, M., & Simon, H. (1993). Corticosterone in the range of stress-induced levels possesses reinforcing properties: Implications for sensation-seeking behaviors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90, 11738–11742. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.24.11738Google Scholar
Revelle, W., Humphreys, M. S., Simon, L., & Gilliland, K. (1980). The interactive effect of personality, time of the day and caffeine: a test of the arousal model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 1–31. doi:10.1037//0096-3445.109.1.1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reyner, L. A., & Horne, J. A. (2000). Early morning driver sleepiness: effectiveness of 200 mg of caffeine. Psychopharmacology, 37, 251–256.Google ScholarPubMed
Roberts, H. R., & Barone, J. J. (1983). Biological effects of caffeine: history and use. Food Technology, 37, 32–39.Google Scholar
Rogers, P. J., & Dernoncourt, C. (1998). Regular caffeine consumption: a balance of adverse and beneficial effects for mood and psychomotor performance. Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior, 59, 1039–1045. doi:10.1016/S0091-3057(97).00515-7Google Scholar
Rogers, P. J., Martín, J., Smith, C., Heatherley, S. V., & Smit, H. J. (2003). Absence of reinforcing mood and psychomotor performance effects of caffeine in habitual non-consumers of caffeine. Psychopharmacology, 167, 54–62.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., Bons, T. A., & Hur, Y-M. (2008). The genetics and evolution of the general factor of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1173–1185. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushton, J. P., Bons, T. A., Ando, J., Hur, Y-M., Irwing, P., Vernon, P.A., … Barbaranelli, C. (2009). A general factor of personality from multitrait-multimethod data and cross-national twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12, 356–365. doi:10.1375/twin.12.4.356Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. (2008). A General Factor of Personality (GFP) from two meta-analyses of the Big Five: Digman (1997). and Mount, Barrik, Scullen, and Rounds (2005). Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 679–683. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.015Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. (2009a). A general factor of personality in the Comrey Personality Scales, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2, and the Multicultural Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 437–442. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. (2009b). A general factor of personality in 16 sets of the Big Five, the Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey, the California Psychological Inventory, and the Temperament and Character Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 558–564. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.009Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. (2009c). A general factor of personality (GFP) from the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 571–576. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.011Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. (2009d). A General Factor of Personality in the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III, the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology, and the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1091–1095. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schermer, J. A., & Vernon, P. A. (2010). The correlation between general intelligence (g), a general factor of personality (GFP), and social desirability. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 187–189. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Segrera, E., Wolf, A., & Rodgers, L. (2003). States reflecting the Big Five dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 591–603. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02).00031-4Google Scholar
Silverman, K., & Griffiths, R. R. (1992). low-dose caffeine discrimination and self-reported mood effects in normal volunteers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 91–107. doi:10.1901/jeab.1992.57-91Google Scholar
Smit, H. J., & Rogers, P. J. (2000). Effects of low doses of caffeine on cognitive performance, mood and thirst in low and higher caffeine consumers. Psychopharmacology, 152, 167–173. doi:10.1007/s002130000506CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, B. D. (1983). Extraversion and electrodermal activity: arousability and the inverted-U. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 411–420. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(83).90007-7Google Scholar
Smith, A., Brice, C., Nash, J., Rich, N., & Nutt, D. J. (2003). Caffeine and central noradrenalin: effects on mood, cognitive performance, eye movements and cardiovascular function. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 17, 283–292. doi:10.1177/02698811030173010Google Scholar
Solomon, R. L., & Corbit, J. D. (1974). An opponent-process theory of motivation. I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychological Review, 81, 119–145. doi:10.1037/h0036128Google Scholar
Swift, C. G., & Tiplady, B. (1988). The effects of age on the response to caffeine. Psychopharmacology, 94, 29–31. doi:10.1007/BF00735876Google Scholar
Tinley, E. M., Durlach, P. J., & Yeomans, M. R, (2004). How habitual caffeine consumption and dose influence flavour preference conditioning with caffeine. Physiology & Behavior, 82, 317–324. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.03.018Google Scholar
Veselka, L., Schermer, J. A., Petrides, K. V., Cherkas, L. F., Spence, T. D., & Vernon, P. A. (2009a). A general factor of personality: Evidence from the HEXACO Model and a measure of trait emotional intelligence. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12, 420–424. doi:10.1375/twin.12.5.420Google Scholar
Veselka, L., Schermer, J. A., Petrides, K. V., & Vernon, P. A. (2009b). Evidence for a heritable general factor of personality in two studies. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12, 254–260. doi:10.1375/twin.12.3.254Google Scholar
Warburton, D. M., Bersellini, E., & Sweeney, E. (2001). An evaluation of a caffeinated tauring drink on mood, memory and information processing in healthy volunteers without caffeine abstinence. Psychopharmacology, 158, 322–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. A. (1990). Personality, time of day, and arousal. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 153–168. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(90).90008-FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeomans, M. R., Javaherian, S., Tovey, H. M., & Stafford, L. D. (2005). Attention bias for caffeine-related stimuli in high butnot moderate or non-caffeine consumers. Psychopharmacology, 181, 477–485. doi:10.1007/s00213-005-0004-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeomans, M. R., Spetch, H., & Rogers, P. J. (1998). Conditioned flavour preference negatively reinforced by caffeine in human volunteers. Psychopharmacology, 137, 401–409. doi:10.1007/s002130050636CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuckerman, M., & Lubin, B. (1985). The Multiple Affect Adjective Check List Revised. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Services.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., & Neeb, M. (1979). Sensation seeking and psychopathology. Psychiatry Research, 1, 255–264. doi:10.1016/0165-1781(79).90007-6Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (1992). What is a basic factor and which factors are basic? Turtles all the way down. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 675–681. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92).90238-KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Lubin, B., & Rinck, C. M. (1983). Construction of new scales for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check list. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 5, 119–129. doi:10.1007/BF01321444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The Big Three, The Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757–768. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.757CrossRefGoogle Scholar