Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:09:46.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychometric Properties of a Spanish Version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) in General Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Inés Magán ,
Jesús Sanz  and
María Paz García-Vera
Inés Magán
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
Jesús Sanz*
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
María Paz García-Vera
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article can be addressed to Jesús Sanz, Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Psicología Clínica, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Campus de Somosaguas, 28223 Madrid. E-mail: jsanz@psi.ucm.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is the first study that provides normative, reliability, factor validity and discriminant validity data of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI; Beck, Epstein, Brown, & Steer, 1988) in the Spanish general population. Sanz and Navarro's (2003) Spanish version of the BAI was administered to 249 adults. Factor analyses suggested that the BAI taps a general anxiety dimension comprising two related factors (somatic and affective-cognitive symptoms), but these factors hardly explained any additional variance and, therefore, little information is lost in considering only full-scale scores. Internal consistency estimate for the BAI was high (α = .93). The BAI was correlated .63 with the BDI-II and .32 with the Trait-Anger scale of the STAXI 2, but a factor analysis of their items revealed three factors, suggesting that the correlations between the instruments may be better accounted for by relationships between anxiety, depression, and anger, than by problems of discriminant validity. The mean BAI total score and the distribution of BAI scores were similar to those found in other countries. BAI norm scores for the community sample were provided from the total sample and from the male and female subsamples, as females scored higher than males. The utility of these scores for assessing clinical significance of treatment outcomes for anxiety is discussed.

Se presentan por primera vez datos normativos, de fiabilidad, validez factorial y validez discriminante del Inventario de Ansiedad de Beck (BAI; Beck, Epstein, Brown y Steer, 1988) en la población general española. La versión española del BAI de Sanz y Navarro (2003) fue administrada a 249 adultos. Los análisis factoriales indicaron que el BAI mide una dimensión general de ansiedad compuesta de dos factores relacionados (somático y afectivo cognitivo), pero estos factores apenas explicaban varianza adicional por lo que no se pierde mucha información al considerar únicamente la puntuación global. La fiabilidad de consistencia interna del BAI fue elevada (alfa = 0,93). El BAI correlacionó 0,63 con el BDI-II y 0,32 con la escala de Ira Rasgo del STAXI 2, pero el análisis factorial de los tres instrumentos reveló que sus ítems formaban tres factores, sugiriendo que las correlaciones entre instrumentos se deben más a la relación entre ansiedad, depresión e ira que a un problema de validez discriminante. La puntuación media en el BAI y la distribución de sus puntuaciones fueron similares a las encontradas en otros países. Se ofrecen baremos para la muestra total y dividida por el sexo, ya que las mujeres puntuaron más alto que los varones, y se discute su utilidad para evaluar la significación clínica de los resultados de los tratamientos para la ansiedad.

Keywords

anxietyBAIreliabilityvaliditynormsansiedadBAIfiabilidadvalideznormas
Type
Articles
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , November 2008 , pp. 626 - 640
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aasen, H. (2001). An empirical investigation of depression symptoms: Norms, psychometric characteristics and factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II. University of Bergen. Retrieved February 14, 2003, from: http://www.ub.uib.no/elpub/2001/h/308003/Hovedoppgave.pdf.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Ayers, C. R., Sorrell, J. T., Thorp, S. R., & Wetherell, J. L. (2007). Evidence-based psychological treatments for late-life anxiety. Psychology and Aging, 22, 8–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. (1990). Beck Anxiety Inventory manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. (1993). Beck Anxiety Inventory manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). BDI-II. Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Borden, J. W., Peterson, D. R., & Jackson, E. A. (1991). The Beck Anxiety Inventory in nonclinical samples: Initial psychometric properties. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 13, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botella, C., & Ballester, R. (1997). Trastorno de pánico: Evaluación y tratamiento. Barcelona: Martínez Roca.Google Scholar
Butler, G., Fennell, M., Robson, P., & Gelder, M. (1991). Comparison of behavior therapy and cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambless, D. L., & Gillis, M. M. (1993). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 248–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cliff, J. (1966). Orthogonal rotation to congruence. Psychometrika, 31, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Comeche, M. I., Díaz, M., & Vallejo, M. (1995). Cuestionarios, inventarios y escalas. Ansiedad, depresión y habilidades sociales. Madrid: Fundación Universidad-Empresa.Google Scholar
Creamer, M., Foran, J., & Bell, R. (1995). The Beck Anxiety Inventory in a non-clinical sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 477–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ayala, R. J., Vonderharr-Carlson, D. J., & Kim, D. (2005). Assessing the reliability of the Beck Anxiety Inventory scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 742–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Echeburúa, E. (1993). Ansiedad crónica. Evaluación y tratamiento. Madrid: Eudema.Google Scholar
European Commission (2004). The state of mental health in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Freeston, M. H., Ladouceur, R., Thibodeau, N., Gagnon, F., & Rhéaume, J. (1994). L'inventaire d'anxiété de Beck: Propriétés psychométriques d'une traduction française. L'Encéphale, 20, 47–55.Google Scholar
Gillis, M. M., Haaga, D. A. F., & Ford, G. T. (1995). Normative values for the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Fear Questionnaire, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, and Social Phobia Anxiety Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 7, 450–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hewitt, P. L., & Norton, G. R. (1993). The Beck Anxiety Inventory: A psychometric analysis. Psychological Assessment, 5, 408–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo Montesinos, M. D., Galindo Garre, F., Inglés Saura, C. J., Campoy Menéndez, G., & Ortiz Soria, B. (1999). Estudio del funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems en una Escala de Habilidades Sociales para Adolescentes. Anales de Psicología, 15, 333–345.Google Scholar
Hollon, S. D., & Flick, S. N. (1988). On the meaning and methods of clinical significance. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 197–206.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2004). Censos de población y viviendas 2001. Resultados definitivos. Retrieved July 25, 2005, from: http://www.ine.es.Google Scholar
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jylhä, P., & Isometsä, E. (2006). The relationship of neuroticism and extraversion to symptoms of anxiety and depression in the general population. Depression and Anxiety, 23, 281–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazdin, A. E. (1992). Research design in clinical psychology (2nded.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Kendall, P. C., & Grove, W. M. (1988). Normative comparisons in therapy outcome. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 147–158.Google Scholar
Kendall, P. C., Marrs-Garcia, A., Nath, S. R., & Sheldrick, R. C. (1999). Normative comparisons for the evaluation of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 285–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, R. C., McGonagle, K. A., Zhao, S., Nelson, C. B., Hughes, M., Eshleman, S., Wittchen, H. U., & Kendler, K. S. (1994). Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 8–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magán, I., Sanz, J., & García-Vera, M. P. (2008a). Development and validation of a measure of thoughts specific to anger and hostility: the Angry/Hostile Thoughts Inventory. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Magán, I., Sanz, J., & García-Vera, M. P. (2008b). The Angry/Hostile Attitudes Inventory: a new tool to measure dysfunctional attitudes specifically associated with anger and hostility. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Marai, L. (2004). Anxiety and hopelessness in two South Pacific countries: Exploratory studies. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 32, 723–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, P. M., & Nathan, P. (2007). Effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy for diagnostically heterogeneous groups: a benchmarking study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 344–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nitschke, J. B., Heller, W., Imig, J. C., McDonald, R. P., & Miller, G.A. (2001). Distinguishing dimensions of anxiety and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhagen, T. (2001). Beck Anxiety Inventory: translation and validation of a Norwegian version. Master's thesis. University of Bergen.ieved October 11, 2005. from http://www.ub.uib.no/elpub/2001/h/308004/Hovedoppgave.pdf.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill [Spanish translation: Teoría psicométrica. Mexico: McGraw-Hill, 1995].Google Scholar
O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 396–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osman, A., Barrios, F. X., Aukes, D., Osman, J. R., & Markway, K. (1993). The Beck Anxiety Inventory: Psychometric properties in a community population. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 15, 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osman, A., Kopper, B. A., Barrios, F. X., Osman, J. R., & Wade, T. (1997). The Beck Anxiety Inventory: Reexamination of factor structure and psychometric properties. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 7–14.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piotrowski, C. (1999). The status of the Beck Anxiety Inventory in contemporary research. Psychological Reports, 85, 261–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robles, R., Varela, R., Jurado, S. & Páez, F. (2001). Versión mexicana del Inventario de Ansiedad de Beck: propiedades psicométricas. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 18, 211–218.Google Scholar
Sanz, J., García-Vera, M. P., Espinosa, R., Fortún, M., & Vázquez, C. (2005). Adaptación española del Inventario para la Depresión de BeckCII (BDI-II): 3. Propiedades psicométricas en pacientes con trastornos psicológicos. Clínica y Salud, 16, 121–142.Google Scholar
Sanz, J., Magán, I., & García-Vera, M. P. (2006). Personalidad y el síndrome AHI (agresión-hostilidad-ira): relación de los Cinco Grandes con ira y hostilidad. Psicopatología Clínica, Legal y Forense, 6, 153–176.Google Scholar
Sanz, J., & Navarro, M. E. (2003). Propiedades psicométricas de una versión española del Inventario de Ansiedad de Beck (BAI) en estudiantes universitarios. Ansiedad y Estrés, 9, 59–84.Google Scholar
Sanz, J., Navarro, M. E., & Vázquez, C. (2003). Adaptación española del Inventario para la Depresión de Beck-II (BDI-II): 1. Propiedades psicométricas en estudiantes universitarios. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 29, 239–288.Google Scholar
Sanz, J., Perdigón, L. A., & Vázquez, C. (2003). Adaptación española del Inventario para la Depresión de BeckCII (BDI-II): 2. Propiedades psicométricas en población general. Clínica y Salud, 14, 249–280.Google Scholar
Siev, J., & Chambless, D. L. (2007). Specificity of treatment effects: Cognitive therapy and relaxation for generalized anxiety and panic disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 513–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spielberger, C. D. (1999). Manual for the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory, STAXI-2. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D., Miguel-Tobal, J. J., Casado, M. I., & Cano-Vindel, A. (2001). Inventario de Expresión de Ira Estado-Rasgo: STAXI-2. Madrid: TEA.Google Scholar
Steer, R. A., & Clark, D. A. (1997). Psychometric characteristics of the Beck Depression Inventory-II with college students. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30, 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steer, R. A., Rissmiller, D. J., Ranieri, W. F., & Beck, A. T. (1993). Structure of the computer-assisted Beck Anxiety Inventory with psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 532–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, J. C., Janicki, D. L., Muldoon, M. F., Sutton-Tyrrell, K., & Kamarck, T. W. (2007). Negative emotions and 3-year progression of subclinical atherosclerosis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taft, C. T., Street, A. E., Marshall, A. D., Dowdall, D. J., & Riggs, D. S. (2007). Posttraumatic stress disorder, anger, and partner abuse among Vietnam combat veterans. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 270–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium (2004). Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA, 291, 2581–2590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westbrook, D., & Kirk, J. (2005). The clinical effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy: Outcome for a large sample of adults treated in routine practice. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1243–1261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolff, H., & Preising, K. (2005). Exploring item and higher order factor structure with the Schmid–Leiman solution: Syntax codes for SPSS and SAS. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yim, J. Y., & Mahalingam, R. (2006). Culture, masculinity, and psychological well-being in Punjab, India. Sex Roles, 55, 715–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 432–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar