Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:26:50.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-Relation of Adolescents in a Family with a Step-Father

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Ksenia N. Belogai
Ksenia N. Belogai*
Affiliation:
Kemerovo State University (Russia)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Ksenia N. Belogai. Department of General Psychology and Developmental Psychology, office 6220. Kemerovo State University. Krasnaya Str.6, 650043 Kemerovo. (Russia). Phone: +7-3842581290. E-mail: belogi@mail.ru
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article represents an empirical study of adolescent's self-relation in a family where the mother has re-married. In many studies self-awareness and its functional aspect – self-relation – are selected as new stages in adolescence. The family is considered to be the most important factor in a child's and adolescent's personality development. Literature reviews on the specifics of a child's development in a family with a second marriage present some of the problems facing the parents and children in it. In the present article, problems of relations between children and parents are discussed. A principal finding of this report is that adolescents from families with a stepfather have a less flexible self-relation than adolescents from families with the biological father; to have a positive self-relation they need defence mechanisms. At the same time, analysis of adolescents' drawings shows that adolescents from families with a stepfather exclude themselves from the family system. In addition, the article discusses gender differences in self-relation in two types of families.

El artículo representa un estudio empírico de la auto-relación del adolescente en una familia en la que la madre se ha vuelto a casar. En muchos estudios la auto-conciencia y su aspecto funcional – auto-relación – son seleccionados como estadíos nuevos en la adolescencia. La familia es considerada como el factor más importante en el desarrollo de la personalidad del niño y el adolescente. La revision de literatura sobre las especificidades del desarrollo infantil en una familia con segundo matrimonio presenta alguno de los problemas que los padres e hijos afrontan en ella. En el presente artículo, se discuten los problemas en las relaciones entre hijos y padres. Un hallazgo principal de este reporte es que los adolescentes de familias con padrastro tienen una auto-relación menos flexible que los adolescentes de familias con padre biológico; para tener una auto-relación positiva elolos necesitan mecanismos de defensa. Al mismo tiempo, el análisis de dibujos de los adolescentes muestra que los adolescentes de familias con padrastro se excluyen a sí mismos del sistema familiar. Además, el artículo discute las diferencias de género en la auto-relación en los dos tipos de familias.

Keywords

adolescent's self-awarenessadolescent's self-relationstepfatherfamilyauto-conciencia del adolescenteauto-relación del adolescentepadrastrofamilia
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , November 2010 , pp. 718 - 729
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreeva, T. V. (2005). Semeynaya psikhologiya [Family psychology]. Saint-Petersburg: Rech.Google Scholar
Arnautova, E. P. (1997a). Povtorniy brak materi i ee otnosheniya s rebenkom [The second mother's marriage and her relationship with the child]. Semeynaya Psikhologiya i Semeynaya Terapiya, 1, 84–94.Google Scholar
Arnautova, E. P. (1997b). Stabilnost semyi osnovannoy na povtornom brake materi [Family stability based on the second mother's marriage]. Semeynaya Psikhologiya i Semeynaya Terapiya, 2, 55–66.Google Scholar
Burns, R. C., & Kaufman, H. (1970). Kinetic family drawings (K-F-D): an introduction to understanding children through kinetic drawings. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Craig, G. J. (1996). Human development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Debess, M. (2004). Podrostok [An adolescent]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter.Google Scholar
Dementeva, I. F. (2001). Negativnye factory vospitaniya detey v nepolnoy semye [Negative factors of children's education in an incomplete family]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 11, 108–114.Google Scholar
Frolov, Yu. I. (Ed.) (1997). Psikhologiya podrostka. Khrestomatiya [Psychology of adolescent. Anthology] (1997). Moscow: Rossiyskoe pedagogicheskoe agentstvo.Google Scholar
Gurko, T. A. (1996). Osobennosti razvitiya lichnosti podrostkov v razlichnykh tipakh semey [Specific features of adolescent's personality development in different types of families]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 3, 31–37.Google Scholar
Karabanova, O. A. (2005). Psikhologiya semeynykh otnoshenii i osnovy semeynogo konsultirovaniya [Psychology of family relations and principles of family consultation]. Moscow: Gardariki.Google Scholar
Minakova, L. K., & Zhukova, M. N. (2005). Izuchenie osobennostey emosionalnogo otnosheniya detey k roditeliam nakhodashimsa v razvode [Research of children's emotional relationship with their divorced parents]. Semeynaya Psikhologiya i Semeynaya Terapiya, 1, 9–13.Google Scholar
Mukhina, V. S. (2006). Vosrastnaya psikhologiya: fenomenologiya razvitiya [Age-specific psychology: phenomenology of development]. Moscow: Akademiya.Google Scholar
Olifirovich, N. I., Zincevich-Kuzemkina, T. A., & Velenta, T. F. (2005). Semeynye krizisy: fenomenologiya, diagnostika, psikhologicheskaya pomosch [Family's crisis's: phenomenology, diagnostics, psychological help]. Moscow – Obninsk: IG-SOCIN.Google Scholar
Panteleev, S. R. (1991). Samootnosheniye kak emosionalno-otsenochnaya sistema [Self-relationship as emotional-evaluation system]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Raigorodskii, D. Y. (2002). Podrostok i semya [The adolescent and the family]. Samara: BAHRAM-M.Google Scholar
Shneyder, L. B. (2006). Semeynaya psikhologiya [Family psychology]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt.Google Scholar
Schaefer, E. S. (1965). Children's reports of parental behavior: an inventory. Child Development, 36(2) 413–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokolova, E. T., & Chesnokova, I. G. (1986). Zavisimost samootsenki podrostka ot otnosheniya k nemu roditeley [Adolescent's self-esteem as a function of parents' attitude toward him]. Voprosy Psykhologii, 2, 110–117.Google Scholar
Tseluyko, V. M. (2004). Psikhologicheskie problemy povtornykh brakov [Psychological problems of second marriages] Semeynaya Psikhologiya i Semeynaya Terapiya, 3, 16–23.Google Scholar
Wasserman, L. I., & Gorkovaya, I. A., & Romytsina, E. R. (1994). Psikhologicheskaya metodika “Podrostki o roditelyah” i ee prakticheskoe primeneniye [Psychological method “Adolescents about parents” and its practical application]. Moscow: Folium.Google Scholar