Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T15:56:59.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Regulation of Combination: The Implications of Combining Natural Resource Conservation and Environmental Protection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

JoyAnna S. Hopper*
Affiliation:
Sewanee: The University of the South, Sewanee, TN, USA
*
JoyAnna S. Hopper, Department of Politics, Sewanee: The University of the South, 204B Guerry Hall, Sewanee, TN 37375, USA. Email: jshopper@sewanee.edu

Abstract

In 15 American states, environmental protection agencies perform both pollution-control and natural resource conservation functions. In this study, I examine how this combination of functions affects the regulatory style embraced by these agencies. I find, through interviews with environmental agency workers and empirical analyses using enforcement data from 2010 to 2014, that the cooperation and flexibility with industry inherent to natural resource conservation efforts is a fundamental part of the regulatory process within these combined agencies. Great efforts are made to garner voluntary or negotiated compliance without the possible economic consequences of punitive actions. Enforcements are less frequent and less severe. The effect of this agency design choice is powerful, maintaining its effect even when controlling for political, ideological, and economical pressures. In a time where environmental protection agencies are increasingly interested in incorporating management-based regulation and voluntary compliance to supplement command and control regulation, it is more important than ever to understand the regulation that emerges from this combination.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atlas, Mark. 2007. “Enforcement Principles and Environmental Agencies: Principal-Agent Relationships in a Delegated Environmental Program.” Law & Society Review 41 (4): 939–80..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacot, A. Hunter, and Dawes, Roy A.. 1997. “State Expenditures and Policy Outcomes in Environmental Program Management.” Policy Studies Journal 25:355–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Katherine, and Greene, Richard. 2008. “Grading the States '08: The Mandate to Measure.” The State Management Report Card for 2008. http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/pcs_assets/2008/GradingtheStates2008pdf.pdf (accessed September 28, 2016).Google Scholar
Bennear, Lori Snyder. 2006. “Evaluating Management-Based Regulation: A Valuable Tool in the Regulatory Toolbox?” Pp. 5186. In Leveraging the Private Sector: Management-Based Strategies for Improving Environmental Performance, eds. Coglianese, Cary and Nash, Jennifer. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future Press.Google Scholar
Carrigan, Christopher. 2014. “Captured by Disaster? Reinterpreting Regulatory Behavior in the Shadow of the Gulf Oil Spill.” Pp. 239291. In Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It, eds. Carpenter, Daniel and Moss, David A.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coglianese, Cary, and Lazer, David. 2003. “Management-Based Regulation: Prescribing Private Management to Achieve Public Goals.” Law & Society Review 37 (4): 691730..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coglianese, Cary, and Nash, Jennifer. 2001. “Environmental Management Systems and the New Policy Agenda.” Pp. 125. In Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals? eds. Coglianese, C. and Nash, Jennifer. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future Press.Google Scholar
Daley, Dorothy, and Garand, James C.. 2005. “Horizontal Diffusion, Vertical Diffusion, and Internal Pressure in State Environmental Policymaking, 1989–1998.” American Politics Research 37:615–44.Google Scholar
Davis, Charles, and Davis, Sandra K.. 1999. “State Enforcement of the Federal Hazardous Waste Program.” Polity 31:450–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewatripont, Mathias, Jewitt, Ian, and Tirole, Jean. 2000. “Multitask Agency Problems: Focus and Task Clustering.” European Economic Review 44 (4–6): 869–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2010. “Informal and Formal Actions: Summary of Guidance and Portrayal on EPA Websites.” https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-11/documents/actiondefs.pdf (accessed September 28, 2016).Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. “Introduction: Environmental Enforcement and Compliance.” Compliance and Enforcement. http://www.epa.gov/region9/enforcement/intro.html (accessed September 28, 2016).Google Scholar
Gilless, Keith, Lee, Robert, Lippke, Bruce, and Sommers, Paul. 1990. “Three-State Impact of Spotted Owl Conservation and Other Timber Harvest Reductions: A Comparative Evaluation of the Economic and Social Impacts.” College of Forest Resources, Institute of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Hall, Bob and Kerr, Mary Lee. 1991. 1991-1992 Green Index: A State-by-State Guide to the Nation's Environmental Health. Island Press.Google Scholar
Hays, Scott P., Esler, Michael, and Hays, Carol F.. 1996. “Environmental Commitment among the States: Integrating Alternative Approaches to State Environmental Policy.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 26:4158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedge, David and Johnson, Renee J.. 2002. “The Plot that Failed: The Republican Revolution and Congressional Control of the Bureaucracy.” Journal of Public Administration and Theory 12 (3): 333–51..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, M. 2004. Oil and Gas Exploration and Development on Public Lands. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Hunter, Susan, and Waterman, Richard. 1992. “Determining an Agency's Regulatory Style: How does the EPA Water Office Enforce the Law?Western Political Quarterly 45 (2): 403–17..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karkkanien, Bradley. 2003. “Adapative Ecosystem Management and Regulatory Penalty Defaults: Toward a Bounded Pragmatism.” Pp. 5194. In The Jurisdynamics of Environmental Protection: Change and the Pragmatic Voice in Environmental Law, ed. Chen, Jim. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.Google Scholar
Konisky, David M. 2008. “Regulator Attitudes and the Environmental Race to the Bottom Argument.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (2): 321–44..Google Scholar
Konisky, David M., and Woods, Neal D.. 2012. “Measuring State Environmental Policy.” Review of Policy Research 29 (4): 544–69..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konisky, David M., and Woods, Neal D.. 2013. “Environmental Policy.” Pp. 469500. In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, 10th ed., eds. Gray, Virginia, Hanson, Russel L., and Kousser, Thad. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Koontz, Thomas M. 2002. Federalism in the Forest: National versus State Natural Resource Policy. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Luther, L. 2006. The National Environmental Policy Act: Streamlining NEPA. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Maynard-Moody, Steven, and Herbert, Adam W.. 1989. “Beyond Implementation: Developing an Institutional Theory of Administrative Policy Making.” Public Administration Review 49 (2): 137–43..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and O'Toole, Laurence J. Jr. 2006. “Political Control versus Bureaucratic Values: Reframing the Debate.” Public Administration Review 66 (2): 177–92..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, Jill, and Miller, Susan M.. 2012. “Bureaucratic Effectiveness and Influence in the Legislature.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (2): 347–71..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickell, Stephen. 1981. “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects.” Econometrica 49 (6): 1417–26..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, Martin. 2008. “The Underappreciated Role of Regulatory Enforcement in Natural Resource Conservation.” Policy Sciences 41 (2): 139–64..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringquist, Evan J. 1993. Environmental Protection at the State Level. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Satchell, Michael. 1996. “At War in an Ancient Forest.” U.S. News & World Report, 23 September, pp. 7476.Google Scholar
Shover, Neal, Clelland, Donald A., and Lynxwiler, John. 1986. Enforcement or Negotiation: Constructing a Regulatory Bureaucracy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Souder, Jon A., and Fairfax, Sally K.. 1996. State Trust Lands: History, Management, and Sustainable Use. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard B. 2001. “A New Generation of Environmental Regulations?Capital University Law Review 29 (1): 21.Google Scholar
U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2000. Environmental Protection: More Consistency Needed among EPA Regions in Approach to Enforcement. GAO/RCED-00-108. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2006. Environmental Compliance and Enforcement: EPA's Effort to Improve and Make More Consistent its Compliance and Enforcement Activities. GAO-06-840T. Testimony by John B. Stephenson before the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, June 28, 2006. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.Google Scholar
U.S.D.A. Forest Service. 2002. “The Process Predicament: How Statuatory, Regulatory, and Administrative Factors Affect National Forest Management.” Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2009. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 4th ed. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Wood, Dan B. 1992. “Modeling Federal Implementation as a System: The Clean Air Case.” American Journal of Political Science 36:4067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Neal D. 2008. “The Policy Consequences of Political Corruption: Evidence from State Environmental Programs.” Social Science Quarterly 89:258–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar