No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Substantive and Political Learning among the US States: Abortion Policy Diffusion, 1993–2016
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 September 2022
Abstract
Do policymakers learn from the policy experiences of other governments, and if so, what do they learn? A long-established normative claim suggests that intergovernmental learning can and should occur among the US states, which serve as “laboratories of democracy” for the nation. We put this claim to a tough test, comparing the influences on the diffusion of instrumental Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP) laws with that of more symbolic abortion regulation, from 1993 to 2016. We find evidence of substantive intergovernmental learning in policy diffusion even for abortion regulation—but only for instrumental abortion regulation. On symbolic abortion policy, states appear to learn mainly political lessons. Furthermore, proponents and opponents appear to learn different lessons in these diffusions, with loss aversion motivating opponents especially highly. Our results suggest that policymakers have a sophisticated understanding of the differences among policies’ goals and act strategically in pursuit of those goals.
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association
References
Adams, Greg D. 1997. “Evidence of an Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 718–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Mahalley D., Pettus, Carrie, and Haider-Markel, Donald P.. 2004. “Making the National Local: Specifying the Conditions for National Government Influence on State Policymaking.” State Politics and Politics Quarterly 4 (3): 318–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Nichole, and Harper, Sam. 2019. “Constructing a Longitudinal Database of Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers Laws.” Health Services Research 54 (5): 1084–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balla, Steven J. 2001. “Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations.” American Politics Research 29 (3): 221–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes, and Berry, William D.. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., and Baybeck, Brady. 2005. “Using Geographic Information Systems to Study Interstate Competition.” American Political Science Review 99 (4): 505–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J. 2009. “Policy Emulation or Policy Convergence? Potential Ambiguities in the Dyadic Event History Approach to State Policy Emulation.” Journal of Politics 71 (3): 1125–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J., and Witmer, Richard. 2004. “Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boonstra, Heather D., and Nash, Elizabeth. 2014. “A Surge of State Abortion Restrictions Puts Providers—And the Women They Serve—In the Crosshairs.” Guttmacher Policy Review 17 (1): 9–15.Google Scholar
Bouche, Vanessa, and Volden, Craig. 2011. “Privatization and the Diffusion of Innovations.” Journal of Politics 73 (2): 428–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boushey, Graeme. 2010. Policy Diffusion Dynamics in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boushey, Graeme. 2016. “Targetted for Diffusion? How the Use and Acceptance of Stereotypes Shape the Diffusion of Criminal Justice Policy Innovation in the American States.” American Political Science Review 110 (1): 198–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Dietmar, and Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2006. “Taking ‘Galton’s Problem’ Seriously: Toward a Theory of Policy Diffusion.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 18 (3): 298–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bricker, Christine, and LaCombe, Scott. 2021. “The Ties that Bind Us: The Influence of Perceived State Similarity on Policy Diffusion.” Political Research Quarterly 74 (2): 377–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burlone, Nathalie, and Richmond, Rebecca Grace. 2018. “Between Morality and Rationality: Framing End-of-Life Care Policy through Narratives.” Policy Sciences 51: 313–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calkin, Sydney, and Kaminska, Monika Ewa. 2020. “Persistence and Change in Morality Policy: The Role of the Catholic Church in the Politics of Abortion in Ireland and Poland.” Feminist Review 124 (1): 86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, David B., and Signorino, Curtis S.. 2010. “Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data.” Political Analysis 18 (3): 271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocca, Carolyn. 2004. Jailbait: The Politics of Statutory Rape Laws in the United States. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Crist, Juliana Vines 2010. “The Myth of Fetal Personhood: Reconciling Roe and Fetal Homicide Laws.” Case Western Reserve Law Review 60 (3): 851–87.Google Scholar
Desmarais, Bruce A., Hardin, Jeffrey J., and Boehmke, Frederick J.. 2015. “Persistent Policy Pathways: Inferring Diffusion Networks in American States.” American Political Science Review 109 (2): 392–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., Neiheisel, Jacob R., and Sokhey, Anand E.. 2018. “Reconsidering the Role of Politics in Leaving Religion: The Importance of Affiliation.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (1): 161–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Kobylka, Joseph F.. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Euchner, Eva-Maria, Heichel, Stephan, Nebel, Kerstin, and Raschzok, Andreas. 2013. “From Morality Policy to Normal Policy: Framing of Drug Consumption and Gambling in Germany and the Netherlands and Their Regulatory Consequences.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (3): 372–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, Daniel L. 2018. “Moves and Countermoves: Countermovement Diffusion of State Constitutional Amendments.” Policy Studies Journal 46 (2): 354–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2010. “Who Learns What in Policy Diffusion Processes?” American Journal of Political Science 54 (3): 650–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio, Shipan, Charles R., and Wueest, Bruno. 2021. “Policy Diffusion: The Issue-Definition Stage.” American Journal of Political Science 65 (1): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio, and Fuglister, Katharina. 2008. “Empirical Modeling of Policy Diffusion in Federal States: The Dyadic Approach.” Swiss Journal of Political Science 14 (3): 413–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, Rachel Benson, and Nash, Elizabeth. 2013. “TRAP Laws Gain Political Traction while Abortion Clinics—And the Women They Serve—Pay the Price.” Guttmacher Policy Review 16 (2): 7–12.Google Scholar
Graham, Erin R., Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2013. “The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political Science.” British Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 673–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greasley, Kate. 2017. “Taking Abortion Rights Seriously: Whole Woman’s Health v Hellerstedt.” The Modern Law Review 80 (2): 325–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenier, Katharine, and Glenberg, Rebecca. 2014. “Virginia’s Targeted Regulations of Abortion Providers: The Attempt to Regulate Abortion out of Existence.” Washington and Lee Law Review 71 (2): 1233–60.Google Scholar
Grossback, Lawrence J., Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and David, A.M. Peterson. 2004. “Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion.” American Politics Research 32 (5): 521–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Daniel, White, Kari, Hopkins, Kristine, and Potter, Joseph E.. 2014. “The Public Health Threat of Anti-abortion Legislation.” Contraception 89 (1): 73–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halva-Neubauer, Glen. 1990. “Abortion Policy in the Post-Webster Age.” Publius 20 (3): 27–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Heikkila, Tanya, and Gerlak, Andrea K.. 2013. “Building a Conceptual Approach to Collective Learning: Lessons for Public Policy Scholars.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (3): 484–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herd, Pamela, and Moynihan, Donald P.. 2018. Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Hinkle, Rachael K. 2015. “Into the Words: Using Statutory Text to Explore the Impact of Federal Courts on State Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 1002–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bonnie S., Daniel, Sara, and Cloud, Lindsay K.. 2018. “State Law Approaches to Facility Regulation of Abortion and Other Office Interventions.” American Journal of Public Health 108 (4): 486–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, Rachel K., and Jerman, Jenna. 2017. “Abortion Incidence and Service Availability in the United States, 2014.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 49 (1): 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Theodore. 2011. “The Supply-Side Economics of Abortion.” The New England Journal of Medicine 365 (16): 1466–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist 39 (2): 341–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L., and Thaler, Richard H.. 1990. “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and Coase Theorem.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (6): 1325–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karch, Andrew. 2006. “National Intervention and the Diffusion of Policy Innovation.” American Politics Research 34 (4): 403–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karch, Andrew. 2007. Democratic Laboratories: Policy Diffusion among the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karch, Andrew, and Rosenthal, Aaron. 2016. “Vertical Diffusion and the Shifting Politics of Electronic Commerce.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 16 (1): 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreitzer, Rebecca J. 2015. “Politics and Morality in State Abortion Policy.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 15 (1): 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreitzer, Rebecca J., Kane, Kellen A., and Mooney, Christopher Z.. 2019. “The Evolution of Morality Policy Debate: Moralization and Demoralization.” The Forum 17 (1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaCombe, Scott, and Boehmke, Frederick J. 2020. “Learning and Diffusion Models.” In Sage Handbook of Research Methods for Political Science and International Relations, eds. Curini, L. and Franzese, R.. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Lax, Jeffery R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009. “Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review 103 (3): 367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1992. “An Introduction to Prospect Theory.” Political Psychology 13 (2): 171–86.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1996. “Loss Aversion, Framing, and Bargaining: The Implications of Prospect Theory of International Conflict.” International Political Science Review 17 (2): 179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, James L. 1987. “Regional Leadership Patterns in the Diffusion of Public Policies.” American Politics Quarterly 15 (3): 387–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macinko, James, and Silver, Diana. 2015. “Diffusion of Impaired Driving Laws among U.S. States.” American Journal of Public Health 105 (9): 1893–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makse, Todd, and Volden, Craig. 2011. “The Role of Policy Attributes in the Diffusion of Innovations.” Journal of Politics 73 (1): 108–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallinson, Daniel J. 2021. “Who Are Your Neighbors? The Role of Ideology and Decline of Geographic Proximity in the Diffusion of Policy Innovations.” Policy Studies Journal 49 (10): 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2004. Congress: The Electoral Connection. 2nd edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Medoff, Marshall H. 2010. “State Abortion Policies, Targeted Regulation of Abortion Provider Laws, and Abortion Demand.” Review of Policy Research 27 (5): 577–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medoff, Marshall H., and Dennis, Christopher. 2011. “TRAP Abortion Laws and Partisan Political Party Control of State Governments.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 70 (4): 951–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., Haider-Markel, Donald P., Stanislawski, Anthony J., and McFarlane, Deborah R.. 1996. “The Impact of State-Level Restrictions on Abortion.” Demography 33 (3): 307–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercier, Rebecca J., Buchbinder, Mara, Bryant, Amy, and Britton, Laura. 2015. “The Experiences and Adaptations of Abortion Providers Practicing under a New TRAP Law: A Qualitative Study.” Contraception 91 (6): 507–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merz, Jon F., Jackson, Catherine A., and Klerman, Jacob A.. 1995. “A Review of Abortion Policy: Legality, Medicaid Funding, and Parental Involvement, 1967-1994.” Women’s Rights Law Reporter 17 (1): 1–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Mooney, Christopher Z. 2001a. “Modelling Regional Effects on Policy Diffusion.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z., ed. 2001b. The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z. 2020. The Study of U.S. State Policy Diffusion: What Hath Walker Wrought? New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z., and Lee, Mei-Hsien. 1995. “Legislating Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 599–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z., and Lee, Mei-Hsien. 2000. “The Influence of Values on Consensus and Contentious Morality Policy: U.S. Death Penalty Reform, 1956-82.” Journal of Politics 62 (1): 223–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z., and Schuldt, Richard G.. 2008. “Does Morality Policy Exist? Testing a Basic Assumption.” Policy Studies Journal 36 (2): 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mucciaroni, Gary. 2011. “Are Debates about ‘Morality Policy’ Really about Morality? Framing Opposition to Gay and Lesbian Rights.” Policy Studies Journal 39 (2): 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New, Michael J. 2011. “Analyzing the Effect of Anti-Abortion U.S. State Legislation in the Post-Casey Era.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 11 (1): 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, Sean. 2009. “The Politics of Diffusion: Public Policy in the American States.” Journal of Politics 71 (1): 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Carley, Sanya. 2016. “Effectiveness, Implementation, and Policy Diffusion: Or ‘Can We Make That Work for Us?’” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 16 (1): 78–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrander, Barbara, and Wilcox, Clyde. 1999. “Public Opinion and Policymaking in the States: The Case of Post-Roe Abortion Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 27 (4): 707–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nossiff, Rosemary. 2011. Before Roe: Abortion Policy in the States. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, Maureen R. 2009. “Agenda-Setting and State Policy Diffusion: The Effects of Media Attention, State Court Decisions, and Policy Learning on Fetal Killing Policy.” Social Science Quarterly 90 (1): 167–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacheco, Julianna. 2014. “Measuring and Evaluating Changes in State Opinion across Eight Issues.” American Politics Research 42 (6): 986–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, Dana. 2007. “The Supreme Court and Morality Policy Adoption in the American States: The Impact of Constitutional Context.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (3): 468–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollert, Isaac. 2021. “The Determinants of State Voter Identification Policy: Diffusion Mechanisms in a Post-Shelby Environment.” Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, online (April).Google Scholar
Pollert, Isaac, and Mooney, Christopher Z.. 2022 “Replication Data for: Substantive and Political Learning Among the US States: Abortion Policy Diffusion, 1993–2016.” UNC Dataverse. V1. https://doi.org/10.15139/S3/ARFRCK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Douglas D. 1973. “National and Local Forces in State Politics: The Implications of Multi-Level Policy Analysis.” American Political Science Review 67 (4): 1162–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard. 1991. “What Is Lesson-Drawing?” Journal of Public Policy 11 (1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schecter, David. 2001. “What Drives the Voting on Abortion Policy? Investigating Partisanship and Religion in the State Legislative Arena.” Women & Politics 23 (4): 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seljan, Ellen C., and Weller, Nicholas. 2011. “Diffusion in Direct Democracy: The Effect of Political Information on Proposals for Tax and Expenditure Limits in the U.S. States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 11 (3): 348–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2006. “Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Anti-Smoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 825–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 840–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2012. “Policy Diffusion: Seven Lessons for Scholars and Practitioners.” Public Administration Review 72 (6): 788–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2014. “When the Smoke Clears: Expertise, Learning and Policy Diffusion.” Journal of Public Policy 34 (3): 357–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank, and Garett, Geoffrey. 2006. “Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism.” International Organization 60 (4): 781–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill, and Moncrief, Gary. 2019. State Legislatures Today: State Politics under the Domes, 3rd edition. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Stabile, Bonnie. 2007. “Demographic Profile of States with Human Cloning Laws.” Politics and the Life Sciences 26 (1): 43–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, Janice Gross, and Sheffer, Lior. 2019. “Prospect Theory and Political Decisionmaking.” In The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Political Science, eds. Mintz, A. and Terris, L.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suppe, Rachel. 2014. “A Right in Theory but Not in Practice: Voter Discrimination and TRAP Laws as Barriers to Exercising a Constitutional Right.” American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy, and the Law 23 (1): 107–37Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1991. “Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 1039–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig. 2006. “States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children’s Health Insurance Program.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig, Ting, Michael M., and Carpenter, Daniel P.. 2008. “A Formal Model of Learning and Policy Diffusion.” American Political Science Review 102 (3): 319–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63 (3): 880–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1971. “Innovation in State Politics.” In Politics in the American States, 2nd edition, eds. Jacobs, H. and Vines, K. N.. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1973. “Comment (on Gray).” American Political Science Review 67 (4): 1186–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Michael, and Ross, Marc Howard. 1981. “Galton’s Problem and the Role of Theory.” Political Methodology 7 (1): 71–80.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2009. Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Youlang, and Zhu, Xufeng. 2019. “The Moderating Role of Top-Down Supports in Horizontal Innovation Diffusion.” Public Administration Review 80 (2): 209–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollert and Mooney supplementary material
Pollert and Mooney supplementary material
File
37.6 KB