Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T14:41:57.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct Democracy and the Selection of Representative Institutions: Voter Support for Apportionment Initiatives, 1924–62

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Jonathan Woon
Jonathan Woon*
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

If voters had the opportunity to choose the characteristics of their representative institutions directly, how would they do so? Voters in several states selected the base of their state legislative apportionment through the initiative process prior to the reapportionment revolution of the 1960s, which provides a unique opportunity to answer this question. This study examines 13 such initiatives in four states between 1924 and 1962. Four factors are hypothesized to influence vote choice on these initiatives: urban-rural conflict, partisanship, race, and economic self-interest. Through regression analysis of the county-level vote in these elections I find that economic self-interest consistently influences voter support for apportionment initiatives while these other factors influence it only occasionally. This finding suggests that distributive politics drive voters' evaluation of representative institutions and that the influence of other political factors depends on the historical and local context of an initiative.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , Summer 2007 , pp. 167 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Don A. 1965. Legislative Sourcebook: California Legislature and Reapportionment, 1849–1965. Sacramento, CA: Assembly of the State of California.Google Scholar
Almaguer, Tomas. 1994. Racial Fault Lines: The Historical Origins of White Supremacy in California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Gerber, Alan, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2002. “Equal Votes, Equal Money: Court-Ordered Redistricting and the Distribution of Public Expenditures in the American States.” American Political Science Review 96:767–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2004. “Reapportionment and Party Realignment in the American States.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 153:433–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M. Jr., and Stewart, Charles III. 2000. “Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 44:17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atlas, Cary M., Gilligan, Thomas W., Hendershott, Robert J., and Zupan, Mark A.. 1995. “Slicing the Federal Government Net Spending Pie: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why.” American Economic Review 85:624–9.Google Scholar
Baker, Gordon E. 1955. Rural Versus Urban Political Power: The Nature and Consequences of Unbalanced Representation. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Barclay, Thomas S. 1951. “The Reapportionment Struggle in California in 1948.” Western Political Quarterly 4:313–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicker, William E. 1971. “The Effects of Malapportionment in the States—A Mistrial.” In Reapportionment in the 1970s, ed. Polsby, Nelson. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Branton, Regina P. 2003. “Examining Individual-Level Voting Behavior on State Ballot Propositions.” Political Research Quarterly 56:367–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushnell, Eleanore. 1970. The Impact of Reapportionment on the Thirteen Western States. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Canon, David. 1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, Jack, and Sears, David. 1982. Tax Revolt: Something for Nothing in California. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1966. “The Concept of a Normal Vote.” In Elections and the Political Order, eds. Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
David, Paul T., and Eisenberg, Ralph. 1961. Devaluation of the Urban and Suburban Vote. Vols. 1 and 2. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, Roger. 1962. The Politics of Prejudice: The Anti-Japanese Movement in California and the Struggle for Japanese Exclusion. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Donovan, Todd, and Snipp, Joseph R.. 1994. “Support for Legislative Term Limitations in California: Group Representation, Partisanship, and Campaign Information.” Journal of Politics 65:492–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert G. Jr. 1968. Democratic Representation: Reapportionment in Law and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dye, Thomas. 1965. “Malapportionment and Public Policy in the States.” Journal of Politics 27:586–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagles, Charles W. 1990. Democracy Delayed: Congressional Reapportionment and the Urban-Rural Conflict. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1971. “The Partisan Impact of State Legislative Reapportionment.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 15:57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1973. “Reapportionment and Policy: A Further Look at Some Intervening Variables.” Annals of the New York Academy of Science 219:280–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Elizabeth, and Phillips, Justin. 2003. “Development Ballot Measures, Interest Group Endorsements, and the Political Geography of Growth Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 47:625–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Leroy C., Heslop, Alan, and Andersonn, Stuart, eds. 1981. Reapportionment Politics: The History of Redistricting in the Fifty States. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofferbert, Richard I. 1966. “The Relation between Public Policy and Some Structural and Environmental Variables in the American States.” American Political Science Review 60:73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, Herbert. 1964. “The Consequences of Malapportionment: A Note of Caution.” Social Forces 43:256–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm E. 1962. The Politics of Reapportionment. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. Jr. 1956. American State Politics: An Introduction. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 1998. “Representation and Public Policy: The Consequences of Senate Apportionment for the Geographic Distribution of Federal Funds.” Journal of Politics 60:34–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances E., and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. 1999. Sizing up the Senate: The Unequal Consequences of Equal Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 86:390–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magleby, David. 1984. Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
McCrary, Peyton, and Lawson, Steven. 2000. “Race and Reapportionment: The Case of Georgia Senate Redistricting.” Journal of Policy History 12:293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew, and Schwartz, Thomas. 1988. “Congress, the Courts, and Public Policy: Consequences of the One Man, One Vote Rule.” American Journal of Political Science 32:295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, Robert B. 1965. Reapportionment: The Law and Politics of Equal Representation. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
Pitchell, Robert J. 1961. “Reapportionment as a Control of Voting in California.” Western Political Quarterly 14:214–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulsipher, Allan G., and Weatherby, James L. Jr. 1968. “Malapportionment, Party Competition, and the Functional Distribution of Government Expenditures.” American Political Science Review 62:1207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeck, Bruce W. 1972. “Legislative Partisanship, Constituency, and Malapportionment.” American Political Science Review 66:1246–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxton, Alexander. 1971. The Indispensable Enemy: Labor and the Anti-Chinese Movement in California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar