Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T19:29:58.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partisan Mountains and Molehills: The Geography of U.S. State Intraparty Factionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz  and
John Michael McTague
Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
John Michael McTague
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine whether the geographic distribution of a political party's electoral support affects the divisiveness of statewide primaries. In spite of V.O. Key, Jr.'s (1956) original insight that geography might be a relevant predictor of contested statewide primaries, this hypothesis has received little attention from political scientists. We test Key's hypothesis using data on gubernatorial and U.S. Senate elections to identify the effects of electoral geography on the structure of competition in primary elections. We contend that dispersed bases of electoral support greatly increase the costs associated with maintaining party cohesion. Our findings support the theory that a geographically dispersed electorate heightens the potential for intraparty factionalism. These results are robust across several measures of the dependent variable.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , Spring 2008 , pp. 7 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I., and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 1992. Senate Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 2000. “Presidential Address: Southern Parties in State and Nation.” The Journal of Politics 62:643–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 1998. “Divisive Primaries and General Election Outcomes: Another Look at Presidential Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 42:256–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardwell, Kedron. 2002. “Money and Challenger Emergence in Gubernatorial Primaries.” Political Research Quarterly 55:653–68.Google Scholar
Beck, Paul Allen, Dalton, Russell J., Haynes, Audrey A., and Huckfeldt, Robert. 1997. “Presidential Campaigning at the Grassroots.” The Journal of Politics 59:1264–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Robert A. 1977. “Divisive Primaries Do Hurt: U.S. Senate Races, 1956–1972.” American Political Science Review 71:540–5.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., and Baybeck, Brady. 2005 “Using Geographic Information Systems to Study Interstate Competition.” American Political Science Review 99:505–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., and Canon, Bradley C.. 1993. “Explaining the Competitiveness of Gubernatorial Primaries.” The Journal of Politics 55:454–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Earl, and Black, Merle. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Born, Richard. 1981. “The Influence of House Primary Election Divisiveness on General Election Margins, 1962–1976.” The Journal of Politics 43:640–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradner, Erin, and Mark, Gloria. 2002. “Why Distance Matters: Effects on Cooperation, Persuasion, and Deception.” Delivered at the Computer Science and Cooperative Work Conference, New Orleans, LA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14:63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braumoeller, Bear F. 2004. “Hypothesis Testing and Multiplicative Interaction Terms.” International Organization 58:807–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbank, M.J. 1995. “The Psychological Basis of Contextual Effects.” Political Geography 14:621–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, N. 1994. The Formation of American Local Governments: Private Values in Public Institutions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cairncross, Frances. 2001. The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution is Changing Our Lives. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Carney, Mick. 1998. The Competitiveness of Networked Production: The Role of Trust and Asset Specificity. Journal of Management Studies 35:457–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Wendy K. Tam. 2003. “Contagion Effects and Ethnic Contribution Networks.” American Journal of Political Science. 47:368–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Peterson, David A. M.. 2002. “The Impact of Negative Campaigning: Evidence from the 1998 Senatorial Primaries.” Political Research Quarterly 55:845–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frendreis, John P., Gibson, James L., and Vertz, Laura L.. 1990. “The Electoral Relevance of Local Party Organizations.” American Political Science Review 84:225–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, R. 1982. “In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations.” American Journal of Political Science 26:797–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Cotter, Cornelius P., Bibby, John F., and Huckshorn, Robert J.. 1985. “Whither the Local Parties?: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis of the Strength of Party Organizations.” American Journal of Political Science 29:139–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpel, James G., and Schuknecht, Jason E.. 2002a. “Political and Demographic Foundations for Sectionalism in State Politics: The Connecticut Case.” American Politics Research 30:193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpel, James G., and Schuknecht, Jason E.. 2002b. “Reconsidering Political Regionalism in the American States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2:325–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpel, James G., and Schuknecht, Jason E.. 2003. Patchwork Nation. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grau, Craig H. 1981. “Competition in State Legislative Primaries.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 6:35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstone, J. David. 1969. Labor in American Politics. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Gujarati, Damodar N. 2003. Basic Econometrics, Fourth Edition. New York, NY: Tata McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hacker, Andrew. 1965. “Does a ‘Divisive’ Primary Harm a Candidate's Election Chances?” American Political Science Review 59:105–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Melissa A. 1993. Regression with Dummy Variables. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S. 2004. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S., and Gimpel, James G.. 1995. “District Conditions and Primary Divisiveness in Congressional Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 48:117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hero, Rodney E., and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 1996. “A Racial/Ethnic Diversity Interpretation of Politics and Policy in the States of the U.S.” American Journal of Political Science 40:851–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Robert E. 1999. “Campaign and Contextual Influences on Voter Participation in State Legislative Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 27:403–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1991. “Presidential Elections in Space and Time.” American Journal of Political Science 35:91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in a Presidential Campaign. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckshorn, Robert J., Gibson, James L., Cotter, Cornelius P., and Bibby, John F.. 1986. “Party Integration and Party Organizational Strength.” The Journal of Politics 48:976–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2004. The Politics of Congressional Elections. New York, NY: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm E., and Morehouse, Sarah M.. 2001. Political Parties and Elections in American States, 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm E., and Olson, David M.. 1978. American State Political Parties and Elections. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, R.J. 1974. “Local Effects in Voting at a Local Election.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 64:418–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Karen M. 2004. The Urban Voter. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, Patrick J. 1988. “Sorting Out the Effects of Primary Divisiveness in Congressional and Senatorial Elections.” Western Political Quarterly 41:765–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, Patrick J., and Rice, Tom W.. 1984. “The Effect of Primary Divisiveness in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” The Journal of Politics 46:904–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, Patrick J., and Rice, Tom W.. 1987. “The Relationship between Divisive Primaries and General Election Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science 31:31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V.O. Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Key, V.O Jr. 1956. American State Politics: An Introduction. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2005. Interests, Constituencies, and Policy Making. In The Legislative Branch, eds. Quirk, P. J. and Binder, S. A.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lengle, James I. 1980. “Divisive Presidential Primaries and Party Electoral Prospect: 1932–1976.” American Politics Quarterly 8:261–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maisel, Sandy L., and Stone, Walter J.. 1997. “Determinants of Candidate Emergence in U.S. House Elections: An Exploratory Study.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22:79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Kevin. 2004. “The Exaggerated Death of Geography: Learning, Proximity, and Territorial Innovation Systems.” Journal of Economic Geography 4:3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Gary M., and Olson, Judith S.. 2000. “Distance Matters.” Human-Computer Interaction 15:139–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piereson, James E., and Smith, Terry B.. 1975. “Primary Divisiveness and General Election Success: A Re-Examination.” The Journal of Politics 37:555–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Paul E. 1981. City Limits. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, David R. 1969. “A ‘Friends and Neighbors’ Voting Model as a Spatial Interactional Model for Electoral Geography.” In Behavioral Problems in Geography: A Symposium, eds. Cox, Kevin R. and Golledge, Reginald G., Studies in Geography, 17. Evanston, IN: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Rae, Douglas W. 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, Tom W. 1985. “Gubernatorial and Senatorial Primary Elections: Determinants of Competition.” American Politics Quarterly 13:427–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Tom W., and Macht, Alisa A.. 1987a. “Friends and Neighbors Voting in Statewide General Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 31:448–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Tom W., and Macht, Alisa A.. 1987b. “The Hometown Advantage: Mobilization or Conversion?” Political Behavior 9:257–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1962. A Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. “The Two-party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76:753–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schantz, Harvey L. 1980. “Contested and Uncontested Primaries for the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 5:545–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Shaw, Daron R. 1999. “The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearance on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988–1996.” American Political Science Review 93:345–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Daron R. 2006. The Race to 270: The Electoral College and the Campaign Strategies of 2000 and 2004. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwell, Priscilla L. 1986. “The Politics of Disgruntlement: Nonvoting and Defection Among Supporters of Nomination Losers, 1968–1984.” Political Behavior 8:81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperry, Stephen L. 2005. “Are Republicans Sprawlers and Democrats New Urbanists?—Understanding the Spatial Analysis of the 2004 Presidential Vote.” Clemson University, Department of Planning and Landscape Architecture.Google Scholar
Stone, Clarence N. 1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Stone, Walter J. 1986. “The Carryover Effect in Presidential Elections.” American Political Science Review 80:271–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Walter J., Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Rappoport, Ronald B.. 1992. “Turning On or Turning Off? Mobilization and Demobilization Effects of Participation in Presidential Nomination Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 36:665–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Denis G. 1977. “Party Unity: Appearance and Reality.” Political Science Quarterly 92:635–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, John L. 1973. “Political Correlates of Social, Economic, and Religious Diversity in the American States.” The Journal of Politics 35:70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatalovich, Raymond. 1975. “‘Friends and Neighbors’ Voting: Mississippi, 1943–73.” The Journal of Politics 37:807–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thielemann, Gregory S. 1993. “Local Advantage in Campaign Financing: Friends, Neighbors, and Their Money in Texas Supreme Court Elections.” The Journal of Politics 55:472–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1974. Data Analysis for Politics and Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ware, Alan. 1979. “Divisive Primaries: The Important Questions.” British Journal of Political Science 9:381–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westlye, M.C. 1985. “The Effects of Primary Divisiveness on Incumbent Senators, 1968–1984.” Delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Wielhouwer, Peter W. 1999. “The Mobilization of Campaign Activists by the Party Canvass.” American Politics Quarterly 27:177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1962. The Amateur Democrat: Club Politics in Three Cities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar