Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T18:13:14.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voting in Initiative Elections: Does the Context of Racial and Ethnic Diversity Matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Regina P. Branton
Regina P. Branton*
Affiliation:
Rice University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Does the racial and ethnic diversity of the area in which a voter lives affect his or her political behavior? Scholars have suggested a range of such effects, but these conclusions have questionable generalizability because the behavior they typically examine is racially charged. In this article, I test more general affects of racial and ethnic context by examining political behavior on a range of issues, both racially relevant and racially neutral. Specifically, I examine the impact of the racial and ethnic context on individual-level voting by whites in initiative elections. Merging 1996 and 1998 Voter News Service state exit poll survey data and United States Census Bureau contextual data, I find that there is a distinct relationship between racial and ethnic diversity and white voting behavior on racially relevant ballot initiatives, but that racial diversity does not have a consistent impact on voting on race-neutral initiatives.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , Fall 2004 , pp. 294 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldassare, Mark. 2000. California in the New Millennium: The Changing Social and Political Landscape. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press and the Public Policy Institute of California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banducci, Susan. 1998. “Direct Legislation: When Is It Used and When Does It Pass?” In Citizens as Legislators, eds. Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Tolbert, Caroline. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Norman, Polinard, J.L., and Wrinkle, Robert. 1997. “Mexican-American and Anglo Attitudes toward Immigration Reform: A View from the Border.” Social Science Quarterly 78:325–37.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon. 1983. “The Influence of Constituency Diversity on Electoral Competition in Voting for Congress, 1974-1978.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 8:201–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 1998. Demanding Choices. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Tolbert, Caroline, eds. 1998. Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Branton, Regina P. 2003. “Examining Individual-Level Voting Behavior on State Ballot Propositions.” Political Research Quarterly 56:367–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branton, Regina P., and Jones, Bradford S.. N.d. “Examining Racial Attitudes: The Conditional Relationship between Diversity and Socio-economic Environment.” American Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bryck, Anthony, and Raudenbush, Stephen. 1992. Hierarchical Linear Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, and Green, Donald Phillip. 1990. “The Self-Interest Motive in American Public Opinion.” Research in Micropolitics 3:1–28.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, Reingold, Beth, Walters, Evelyn, and Green, Donald. 1990. “The ‘Official English’ Movement and the Symbolic Politics of Language in the United States.” Western Political Quarterly 43:535–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Thomas. 1989. Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Donovan, Todd, and Snipp, Joseph R.. 1994. “Support for Legislative Term Limitations in California: Group Representation, Partisanship, and Campaign Information.” Journal of Politics 56:492–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eule, Julia. 1990. “Judicial Review of Direct Democracy.” The Yale Law Journal 99:1503–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, John. 1996. Media Matters: Race and Gender in US Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, Hugh. 1997. Ethnic Conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Thomas. 1996. “Fund-raising Edge Fails Parental-Rights Group: 90% of Campaign Donations Not from Colorado,” Denver Post, 6 December, B6.Google Scholar
Gamble, Barbara. 1997. “Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote.” American Journal of Political Science 91:245–69.Google Scholar
Giles, Michael, and Evans, Arthur. 1986. “The Power Approach to Intergroup Hostility.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 30:469–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, James. 1994. “Back to the Black Belt: Racial Environment and White Racial Attitudes in the South.” Journal of Politics 56:21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Harvey. 1995. Multilevel Statistical Models. London, UK: Arnold.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, and Handley, Lisa. 1989. “Black Representation: Making Sense of Electoral Geography at Different Levels of Government.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 14:265–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, Handley, Lisa, and Niemi, Richard. 1992. Minority Representation and the Quest for Voting Equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan, Gerber, Elisabeth, and Louch, Hugh. 2002. “Minorities and Direct Legislation: Evidence from California Ballot Proposition Elections.” Journal of Politics 64:154–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herron, Michael. 1999. “Postestimation Uncertainty in Limited Dependent Variable Models.” Political Analysis 8:83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hero, Rodney. 1998. Faces of Inequality: Social Diversity in American Politics. New York: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
Hero, Rodney, and Tolbert, Caroline. 1996. “A Racial/Ethnic Diversity Interpretation of Politics and Policy in the States of the U.S.” American Journal of Political Science 40:851–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, M.V. III, and Morris, Irwin. 1997. “Amigo O Enemigo?: Context, Attitudes, and Anglo Public Opinion toward Immigration.” Social Science Quarterly 78:309–24.Google Scholar
Hood, M.V. III, Morris, Irwin, and Shirkey, Kurt. 1997. “‘Quedate o Vente!‘: Uncovering the Determinants of Hispanic Public Opinion toward Immigration.” Political Research Quarterly 50:627–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hox, Joop. 1995. Applied Multilevel Analysis. Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties.Google Scholar
Hox, Joop, and Kreft, Ita. 1994. “Multilevel Analysis Models.” Sociological Methods and Research 2:283–99.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert. 1986. Politics in Context: Assimilation and Conflict in Urban Neighborhoods. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Kohfeld, Carol Weitzel. 1989. Race and the Decline of Class in American Politics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Jackman, Mary, and Crane, Marie. 1986. “‘Some of My Best Friends Are Black’: Interracial Friendship and Whites' Racial Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50:459–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey. 1998. “The Influences of Elite Endorsements in Initiative Campaigns.” In Citizens as Legislators, eds. Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Tolbert, Caroline. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald, and Mendelberg, Tali. 1995. “Cracks in American Apartheid.” Journal of Politics 57:402–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Eun Sul, Forthofer, Ronald, and Lorimor, Ronald. 1989. Analysis of Complex Sample Survey Data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Locksley, A., Hepburn, C., and Ortiz, V.. 1982. “Social Stereotypes and Judgments of Individuals: An Instance of the Base Rate Fallacy.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 18:23–42.Google Scholar
Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maullin, Richard. 1999. “Passing California's Proposition 5.” Campaigns and Elections 20:44–6.Google Scholar
Morris, Irwin. 2000. “African American Voting on Proposition 187: Rethinking the Prevalence of Interminority Conflict.” Political Research Quarterly 53:77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, J. Eric, and Mendelberg, Tali. 2000. “Reconsidering the Environmental Determinants of Racial Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 44:574–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfefferman, D., Skinner, C.J., Holmes, D.J., Goldstein, H., and Rasbash, J.. 1998. “Weighting for Unequal Selection Probabilities in Multilevel Models.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 60:23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia, Pickles, Andrew, and Taylor, C.. 2000. “Sg129: Generalized Linear Latent and Mixed Models.” Stata Technical Bulletin 53:47–57.Google Scholar
Rae, Douglas. 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schrag, Peter. 1998. Paradise Lost: California's Experience, America's Future. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David. 1983. “The Person-Positivity Bias.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44:233–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, and Welch, Susan. 1993. “The Contact Hypothesis Revisited: Interracial Contact and Positive Racial Attitudes.” Social Forces 71:781–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Daniel, and Herrington, Robert. 2000. “The Process of Direct Democracy: 1996 Colorado's Parental Rights Amendment.” Social Science Journal 37:179–94.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel, and Tolbert, Caroline. 2001. “The Initiative to Party: Partisanship and Ballot Initiatives in California.” Party Politics 7:781–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco, and Jones, Bradford. 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science 46:218–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Robert, Post, Stephanie, and Rinden, Allison. 2000. “Reconciling Context and Contact Effects on Racial Attitudes.” Political Research Quarterly 53:285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, John. 1973. “Political Correlates of Social, Economic, and Religious Diversity in the American States.” Journal of Politics 35:70–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J., and Hero, Rodney E.. 1996. “Race/Ethnicity and Direct Democracy: An Analysis of California's Illegal Immigration Initiative.” Journal of Politics 58:806–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline, and Hero, Rodney. 1998. “Race/Ethnicity and Direct Democracy: The Contextual Basis of Support for Anti-Immigrant and Official English Measures.” In Citizens as Legislators, eds. Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Tolbert, Caroline. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1993. 103rd Congressional District Geographic Entity File, 1990. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
Voter News Service. 1999. Voter News Service General Election Exit Polls, 1996 and 1998. New York, NY: Voter News Service [producer] and Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, 1999 [distributor].Google Scholar
Wenzel, James, Donovan, Todd, and Bowler, Shaun. 1998. “Direct Democracy and Minorities: Changing Attitudes about Minorities Targeted by Initiatives.” In Citizens as Legislators, eds. Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Tolbert, Caroline. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
White, Kerry A. 1996. “Colorado Voters Reject Parents-Rights Measure.” Education Week 16:1–3.Google Scholar
Zorn, Christopher. 2001. “Generalized Equation Models for Correlated Data: A Review with Applications.” American Journal of Political Science 45:470–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar