No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Industrial Day-Dreams: S. E. Keeble and the Place of Work and Labour in Late Victorian and Edwardian Methodism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 March 2016
Extract
Discussion of the use of time in industrial Britain hardened in the nineteenth century into debates about the morality of work and its rewards, about the ethics of labour and the exploitation of the labourer, issues neglected in a Methodism dominated by the prevailing social thought of evangelicalism which persisted throughout most of the century. While much valuable work has been done recently on a re-assessment of the place of Wesleyan Methodist businessmen’s influence in politics, commerce, and industry in the heyday of Victorian and Edwardian Britain, not so much has been done on the attitudes to poverty and wealth, work, and wages from within the Church establishment, or investigation of how ministers were shaping or reflecting social and political attitudes. This paper seeks to identify the particular contribution of one pivotal figure, Samuel Keeble (1853-1947) whose work deserves a more detailed biography than the Wesley Historical Society lecture published in 1977. His mentor, Hugh Price Hughes, a Wesleyan revivalist but less clearly a Christian socialist, created the environment in which the Wesleyan Methodist Union of Social Service (WMUSS) emerged, through which Keeble was able to channel much of his energies in the promotion of social issues, including those concerning work and labour. It is their contribution that this essay seeks to highlight.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Studies in Church History , Volume 37: The Use and Abuse of Time in Christian History , 2002 , pp. 331 - 342
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2002
References
1 Notably in Jeremy, David, Religion, Business and Wealth in Modern Britain (lLondon, 1998)Google Scholar.
2 Edwards, Michael S., S. E. Keeble: the Rejected Prophet (Broxton, 1977)Google Scholar.
3 Oldstone-Moore, Christopher, Hugh Price Hughes: Founder of a New Methodism, Conscience of a New Nonconformity (Cardiff, 1999)Google Scholar.
4 Social Science and Service: Report of the Oxford Conference of the WMUSS (London, 1909).
5 Quoted in Rattenbury, J. Ernest, ‘John Wesley and social service’, in Keeble, Samuel, ed., The Citizen of Tomorrow (London, 1906), p. 54.Google Scholar
6 Jeremy, David, Capitalists and Christians (Oxford, 1990), p. 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Scotland, Nigel, ‘Methodism and the English Labour Movement 1800–1906’, Anvil, 14 (1996-7), pp. 36–48.Google Scholar
8 Jeremy, Capitalists and Christians, p. 59.
9 Hughes, H. P., Social Christianity (London, 1890), p. viii.Google Scholar
10 Rack, Henry D., ‘Wesleyan Methodism 1849–1902’, in Davies, R. E., George, A. R. and Rupp, G., eds, A History of the Methodist Church in Great Britain, 4 vols (London, 1965-88), 3: 132–6.Google Scholar
11 Rattenbury, J. E., ‘Methodist Evangelism’, in Scott Lidgett, J., ed., Methodism in the Modern World (London, 1929), pp. 169–92.Google Scholar
12 Hughes, H. P., Essential Christianity (London, 1894), p. 174 Google Scholar; see also Hughes, D. P., The Life of Hugh Price Hughes (London, 1905), ch. 14Google Scholar, ‘Citizenship in London’, pp. 329–82.
13 For the background to this, see Inglis, K. S., Churches and the Working Classes in Victorian England (London, 1963)Google Scholar.
14 Keeble, Samuel, Industrial Day-Dreams (London, 1896) [hereafter IDD], pp. vii–viii Google Scholar.
15 Thompson, David M., ‘The emergence of the Nonconformist Social Gospel’, in Robbins, K., ed., Protestant Evangelicalism: Britain, Ireland, Germany and America c. 1750–1960, SCH.S, 7 (Oxford, 1990), pp. 255–80.Google Scholar
16 Edwards, Keeble, p. 13.
17 IDD, p. 13.
18 Edwards, Keeble, p. 15.
19 Turner, J. M. quotes Morgan Phillips’ remark that the Labour Party owed more to ‘Methodism than to Marx’ in his article ‘Methodism 1900–1932’, in Davies, George, and Rupp, A History, 3: 349–61.Google ScholarPubMed
20 IDD, pp. 62–3.
21 Social Science and Service, p. v.
22 Waterhouse, E. S., ‘The public servant’, in Davies, R. E., ed., John Scott Lidgett: a Symposium (London, 1957), p. 162.Google Scholar
23 Edwards, Keeble, p. 28.
24 Bebbington, David, Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: a History from the 1730s to the 1980s (London, 1989), p. 215.Google Scholar
25 Social Science and Service, pp. 188–201.
26 IDD, p. 7.
27 Quoted in Cheatham, C. W., ‘Social Christianity. A study of English nonconformist social attitudes, 1880–1914’ (Vanderbilt University, Ph.D. thesis, 1982), p. 195.Google Scholar
28 IDD, chapter on ‘The Labour Theory of Value’, pp. 106–17.
29 Ibid., p. 137.
30 Ibid., p. 160.
31 Ibid., pp. 165–84.
32 Ibid., p. 192.
33 Ibid., p. 200.
34 See Jeremy, Religion, Business and Wealth, ch. 4.
35 Social Tracts, no. III, pp. 12–20.
36 Keeble, Samuel, The Idea of the Material Life (London, 1908), p. 13.Google Scholar
37 Ibid., pp. 35–6.
38 Ibid., ch. DC, pp. 201–19.
39 See Rattenbury, , ‘Wesley and social service’, pp. 51–68.Google Scholar
40 See Turner, ‘Methodism’, p. 358.
41 Bebbington, Evangelicalism, pp. 214–15.
42 Gladden, Washington, Recollections (New York, 1909), p. 19 Google Scholar.
43 Report published by Council of Churches for Britain and Ireland. See unpublished paper by Macquiban, Tim, ‘Welfare to work: Protestant and Catholic responses in thought and action’Google Scholar.